As far as the AZ-802 practice test are concerned, these AZ-802 practice questions are designed and verified by the experience and qualified Microsoft AZ-802 exam trainers. They work together and strive hard to maintain the top standard of AZ-802 exam practice questions all the time. So you rest assured that with the Microsoft AZ-802 Exam Dumps you will ace your Microsoft AZ-802 exam preparation and feel confident to solve all questions in the final Microsoft AZ-802 exam.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Secure Windows Server hybrid infrastructures | - Identity and access management
|
| Manage hybrid compute and virtualization | - Containers
|
| Networking and storage infrastructure | - Storage management
|
| Monitoring and troubleshooting | - Diagnostics
|
| Implement and manage high availability | - Load balancing and redundancy
|
| Disaster recovery and migration | - Backup and restore
|
The company is preparing for the test candidates to prepare the AZ-802 Study Materials professional brand, designed to be the most effective and easiest way to help users through their want to get the test AZ-802 certification and obtain the relevant certification. In comparison with similar educational products, our training materials are of superior quality and reasonable price, so our company has become the top enterprise in the international market.
NEW QUESTION # 102
Your on-premises network has a 200-Mbps connection to Azure and contains a server named Server1 that stores 70 TB of data files. You have an Azure Storage account named storage1. You plan to migrate the data files from Server1 to a blob storage container in storage1. Testing shows that copying the data files by using azcopy will take approximately 35 days. You need to minimize how long it will take to migrate the data to Azure. What should you use?
Answer: A
Explanation:
At roughly 200 Mbps of effective throughput, moving 70 TB of data online -- as the azcopy test already demonstrated, at about 35 days -- is impractical for any tool that still has to push the bytes across that same constrained link. Microsoft ' s documented offline-transfer path for exactly this kind of large, bandwidth- constrained migration is Azure Data Box: a physically shipped, ruggedized storage appliance that an administrator loads with the data directly on-premises using a local high-speed connection, then ships back to a Microsoft datacenter, where the data is uploaded into the target storage account over Microsoft ' s own internal high-speed backbone rather than the customer ' s internet link. This approach cuts the effective migration time from many weeks down to a matter of days, dominated mostly by shipping time rather than data-transfer time. Storage Migration Service, Azure Storage Explorer, and Azure File Sync all still depend on moving bytes across that same 200 Mbps network connection, so none of them meaningfully improves on the
35-day estimate for this volume of data, making Azure Data Box the only option that actually minimizes the migration time here.
NEW QUESTION # 103
You have two servers named Server1 and Server2 that run Windows Server and have the Hyper-V role installed. You plan to deploy Hyper-V Replica between Server1 and Server2. The deployment will use certificate-based authentication. You need to configure the prerequisites for the Hyper-V Replica deployment.
Which two actions should you perform on each server? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
Answer: A,E
Explanation:
Certificate-based (mutual-TLS) authentication for Hyper-V Replica listens for replication traffic over HTTPS, so each host must have the Hyper-V Replica HTTPS Listener (TCP-In) firewall rule enabled to accept incoming connections; the HTTP listener rule is only used for Kerberos-based authentication and doesn ' t apply here. Each host also needs a valid computer (machine) certificate installed - one that has both Server and Client Authentication EKUs, an associated private key, a subject name matching the host ' s FQDN, and a chain to a trusted root - because this is what replaces Active Directory Kerberos trust between the primary and Replica servers. A user certificate would not satisfy the machine-to-machine authentication that Hyper-V Replica performs, and creating a self-signed certificate on each host independently would not establish the shared trust chain both hosts need to validate each other ' s certificate during the replication handshake. Once both prerequisites are in place on Server1 and Server2, the Enable-VMReplication and Set-VMHost - HttpsCertificateThumbprint cmdlets (or the equivalent Hyper-V Manager wizard) can reference the installed computer certificate to complete the certificate-based replication setup.
NEW QUESTION # 104
Your network contains an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest named contoso.
com. The forest contains three domain controllers that have the DNS Server role installed and host an Active Directory-integrated zone for contoso.com. The DNS servers use existing forwarders for internet name resolution. You have a partner company that owns a DNS namespace named fabrikam.com and provides DNS servers at IP addresses 172.16.10.10 and 172.16.10.11 over a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN. You need to configure the DNS servers in the contoso.com forest. The solution must meet the following requirements: - Send queries for fabrikam.com to the partner company ' s DNS servers. - Continue to use the existing forwarders for other external namespaces. - Apply the configuration to all the current and future DNS servers on the domain controllers in contoso.com. What should you do?
Answer: D
Explanation:
A conditional forwarder routes queries for one specific namespace, here fabrikam.com, to designated DNS servers, leaving the server ' s regular forwarders configuration untouched for every other external name, so it satisfies both the namespace-specific redirection requirement and the requirement to keep using the existing forwarders for all other external lookups; a plain (unconditional) forwarders change would instead redirect every external query, breaking general internet resolution. The requirement to apply the configuration to all current and future DNS servers on the domain controllers in contoso.com is the deciding factor between the two kinds of conditional forwarders: an Active Directory-integrated conditional forwarder is stored in and replicated through an AD DS application directory partition, so creating it once causes it to automatically propagate to every DNS server hosted on a domain controller in the forest today and to any new DNS server promoted later, with no additional configuration step required. A locally stored conditional forwarder exists only in that one server ' s own configuration and must be manually recreated on every other DNS server, and again on any future DNS server, failing the ' future DNS servers ' requirement. Root hints only govern the fallback used when no forwarder answers, are not scoped to a specific namespace, and would not deterministically send fabrikam.com queries to the partner ' s servers over the S2S VPN.
NEW QUESTION # 105
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. Your network contains a single-domain Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest named contoso.com.
The functional level of the forest is Windows Server 2012 R2. All domain controllers run Windows Server
2012 R2. Sysvol replicates by using the File Replication Service (FRS). You plan to replace the existing domain controllers with new domain controllers that will run Windows Server 2022. You need to ensure that you can add the first domain controller that runs Windows Server 2022. Solution: You upgrade the PDC emulator. Does this meet the goal?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Upgrading, or more precisely transferring, the PDC emulator FSMO role to a different domain controller has no bearing whatsoever on which replication engine SYSVOL uses within the domain. The blocking condition preventing a Windows Server 2022 domain controller from being added is strictly that Windows Server 2016 and later builds no longer ship the File Replication Service binaries at all, so as long as SYSVOL keeps replicating over FRS, no domain controller running a newer operating system can be introduced into the domain, entirely regardless of which existing domain controller happens to hold the PDC emulator role at the time. Moving the PDC emulator role does not touch SYSVOL replication technology in any way, does not migrate anything from FRS to DFS Replication, and does not remove the FRS binaries requirement that the domain promotion process checks for. Only actually migrating SYSVOL replication from FRS to DFS Replication addresses the real constraint described in the scenario, so upgrading the PDC emulator alone does not meet the goal.
NEW QUESTION # 106
Your network contains a multi-site Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest. Each Active Directory site is connected by using manually configured site links and automatically generated connections. You need to minimize the convergence time for changes to Active Directory. What should you do?
Answer: B
Explanation:
By default, replication between sites waits for a scheduled interval and does not immediately notify partner domain controllers when a change occurs, which is the main source of intersite convergence delay; intra-site replication, by contrast, uses change notification and typically converges within seconds. The site link ' s options attribute contains a bit flag that controls whether intersite change notification is enabled for that link; turning it on causes a source domain controller to notify its intersite replication partners of a change almost immediately, similar to intra-site behavior, rather than waiting for the next scheduled replication cycle, which directly minimizes convergence time. Modifying site link costs changes which path the Knowledge Consistency Checker prefers when multiple routes exist, affecting topology efficiency but not how quickly a given link propagates a change once it ' s used. Modifying the replication schedule adjusts the windows during which replication over a link is permitted to occur at all, and while a more frequent schedule can reduce worst-case latency somewhat, it does not eliminate the fundamental polling-interval delay the way change notification does. A site link bridge only affects whether transitivity is assumed between site links for cost calculation and has no bearing on notification behavior. Enabling change notification via the options attribute is therefore the correct answer.
NEW QUESTION # 107
......
All AZ-802 online tests begin somewhere, and that is what the AZ-802 training guide will do for you: create a foundation to build on. Study guides are essentially a detailed AZ-802 training guide and are great introductions to new AZ-802 training guide as you advance. The content is always relevant, and compound again to make you pass your AZ-802 exams on the first attempt.
AZ-802 Exam Answers: https://www.itexamsimulator.com/AZ-802-brain-dumps.html