What's more, part of that ITPassLeader Plat-Arch-204 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Ag_mNqGerMbKPfYLNTYFUOnhsX9R8KC
Our most wanted version of the SalesforceExam Questions is our PDF eBook, and it is convenient even students can easily use it. Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 pdf questions are printable and portable features make it more convenient the use. You can prepare with Plat-Arch-204 pdf questions and answers anywhere and anytime. This is the most reliable source of preparation. Our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 desktop-based practice software is the most helpful version to prepare for Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect exam as it simulates the real SalesforceCertified Network Professional Data Center certification exam according to the Salesforcerules.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Exam |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Select |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Real Exam Qty: | Approximately 60 questions |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Data Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect Salesforce Certified Integration Architect |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 58% |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Maintained with annual certification maintenance requirements (no fixed expiration if maintained) |
| Recommended Training: | Integration Architecture Designer Modules Salesforce Trailhead Integration Architect Learning Path |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Registration Webassessor (Kryterion exam delivery) |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center (varies by region and provider availability) |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended prerequisite: Salesforce Certified Application Architect and Salesforce Certified System Architect (part of the Salesforce Certified Technical Architect track is strongly recommended). |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/platformintegrationarchitect |
>> Real Plat-Arch-204 Exams <<
Do you always feel boring and idle in you spare time? And having nothing to do is also making you feel upset? If the answer is yes, then you can make use of your spare time to learn our Plat-Arch-204 practice quiz. No only that you will be bound to pass the exam and achieve the Plat-Arch-204 Certification. In the meantime, you can obtain the popular skills to get a promotion in your company. In short, our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions are the most convenient learning tool for diligent people.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 70
Northern Trail Outfitters is creating a distributable Salesforce package. The package needs to call into a Custom Apex REST endpoint in the central org. The security team wants to ensure a specific integration account is used in the central org that they will authorize after installation. Which item should an architect recommend?
Answer: B
Explanation:
For a distributable package to securely access a central "Hub" org, the architecture must support the OAuth 2.0 Web Server Flow. This flow is designed for applications (like the package installed in a "Spoke" org) that can securely store a Client Secret and need to act on behalf of a specific user.
The Connected App in the central org acts as the "Identity and Access" gatekeeper. A critical component of the Connected App configuration is the Callback URL (Redirect URI). When a user in the "Subscriber" org clicks "Authorize," Salesforce redirects them to the central org to log in. After successful authentication, the central org needs to know where to send the "Authorization Code" back to.
In a multi-org packaging scenario, each subscriber org will have a unique instance URL (e.g., na15.salesforce.com). The architect must ensure that the Connected App's callback URLs are correctly configured to handle these redirects.
Option C (Encrypted Passwords) is a major security risk and is considered an "anti-pattern" in modern integration. Option A is unnecessary, as API access is a standard feature. By using the Connected App with correct Callback URLs, the architect allows the security team in the central org to oversee exactly which "Spoke" orgs have authorized access. They can use the "Connected Apps OAuth Usage" page to monitor, rotate secrets, or revoke access for individual orgs, providing the granular security control required for an enterprise-grade distributed Salesforce architecture.
NEW QUESTION # 71
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to send order and line items directly to an existing finance application webservice when an order is fulfilled. It is critical that each order reach the finance application exactly once for accurate invoicing. Which solution should an architect propose?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Achieving "exactly once" delivery and high reliability in a critical finance integration requires an asynchronous pattern that provides better control and error handling than standard @future methods. Queueable Apex is the architecturally preferred solution for this scenario.
Queueable Apex offers several advantages over @future methods:
Stateful tracking: Unlike @future, Queueable jobs return a Job ID, allowing the system to monitor progress and verify completion.
Chaining: You can chain jobs to process records sequentially, which helps maintain the integrity of order and line item data.
Complex Data Types: Queueables can accept complex objects as parameters, making it easier to pass high-fidelity order data than the primitive types required by @future.
Option A is unreliable because it relies on human intervention for retries, which is prone to error and does not scale. Option C is less desirable because @future methods cannot be monitored as effectively and lack the ability to return a Job ID for subsequent tracking.
To ensure accurate invoicing, the architect should design the Queueable class with a custom error handling process that includes logging failures and a retry mechanism. Additionally, to prevent duplicate invoicing, the finance application should be designed with an Idempotency check (using a unique Order ID from Salesforce) to ensure that if a retry is sent, the system recognizes the duplicate and does not create a second invoice. This combination of Queueable Apex and idempotency provides the highest level of reliability for critical financial transactions.
NEW QUESTION # 72
A developer is researching different implementations of the Streaming API (PushTopic, Change Data Capture, Generic Streaming, Platform Events) and asks for guidance. What should the architect consider when making the recommendation?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When recommending a streaming solution, the architect must evaluate how each event type handles Record-Level Security (Sharing). Change Data Capture (CDC) is unique because it ignores sharing settings for record change events. This means all records of an enabled object generate change events, regardless of whether a particular user has access to those records in the Salesforce UI.
While CDC disregards record-level sharing, it does respect Field-Level Security (FLS). Delivered events only include the fields that the subscribing user is permitted to access. This is a critical consideration for integrations: if a system requires a "Master" view of all record changes across the enterprise (such as a data warehouse sync), CDC is the appropriate tool because it ensures no data is missed due to user-specific sharing constraints.
In contrast, PushTopic Events (Option A) provide a fixed payload based on a SOQL query and do not allow a "custom" payload in the same sense as Platform Events. Platform Events (Option C) are published from Apex or external APIs, but CDC is a platform-native feature that broadcasts automatically when a database record is modified, rather than being "published from Apex" by a developer.
NEW QUESTION # 73
The goals for implementing Salesforce include a 360-degree view, leveraging CRM for marketing, sales, and service, and reusing enterprise quoting/order management. Which three systems from the current landscape can be retired?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When implementing Salesforce to achieve a 360-degree view of the customer, the platform replaces legacy "siloed" applications that perform core CRM functions. Based on the business goals provided, Salesforce will be the master for Marketing, Sales, and Service.
The systems to be retired are those whose functionality is natively subsumed by Salesforce:
Email Marketing: Replaced by Salesforce Marketing Cloud or native marketing features.
Sales Activity: Replaced by Sales Cloud, which masters lead management, opportunity tracking, and activity logging.
Case Management: Replaced by Service Cloud, which provides the tools for customer support agents to resolve inquiries.
Order Management and Quoting are specifically noted as "Enterprise capabilities" that the business wants to reuse. This means these systems will stay in the landscape and be integrated with Salesforce, rather than being retired. Therefore, any option containing "Order Management" (A and C) is incorrect. Retiring the marketing, sales activity, and service systems allows the organization to consolidate its customer data into a single platform, fulfilling the primary goal of the Salesforce transformation.
NEW QUESTION # 74
Northern Trail Outfitters uses Salesforce to track leads and opportunities, and to capture order details. However, Salesforce isn't the system that holds or processes orders. After the order details are captured in Salesforce, an order must be created in the Remote system, which manages the order's lifecycle. The integration architect for the project is recommending a remote system that will subscribe to the platform event defined in Salesforce. Which integration pattern should be used for this business use case?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In this scenario, Salesforce acts as the trigger for a business process that completes in an external system. The architect's recommendation for the remote system to subscribe to a platform event is the classic implementation of the Remote Process Invocation-Fire and Forget pattern.1 In a Fire and Forget pattern, Salesforce initiates a process by publishing a message (the event) to the event bus and then immediately continues its own2 processing without waiting for a functional response from the target system. The "Fire" part occurs when the order details are captured and the event is published; the "Forget" part refers to Salesforce handing off the responsibility of order creation to the remote system. This pattern is ideal for improving user experience and system performance, as it avoids blocking the user interface while waiting for potentially slow back-office systems to respond.
Option A (Request and Reply) is incorrect because that would require Salesforce to make a synchronous call and wait for the remote system to confirm the order was created before allowing the user to proceed. Option C (Remote Call-In) is the inverse of what is described; it would involve the remote system actively reaching into Salesforce to "pull" the data, whereas here Salesforce is "pushing" the notification via an event stream. By using Platform Events to facilitate this hand-off, Northern Trail Outfitters ensures a decoupled, scalable architecture where the remote system can process orders at its own pace while Salesforce remains responsive to sales users.
NEW QUESTION # 75
......
Test Plat-Arch-204 Questions: https://www.itpassleader.com/Salesforce/Plat-Arch-204-dumps-pass-exam.html
2026 Latest ITPassLeader Plat-Arch-204 PDF Dumps and Plat-Arch-204 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Ag_mNqGerMbKPfYLNTYFUOnhsX9R8KC