お客様の時間が大切だということが了解します。私たちの156-590試験問題集の一つの特徴は時間を節約できることです。お客様は支払いに成功した後、自分のメールアドレスで直接に156-590試験問題集をダウンロードできます。勉強するとき、156-590試験問題集の問題の答えを覚えると、156-590試験に参加できます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-Virus and Anti-Bot Protections | 20% | - DNS reputation and threat intelligence integration - Enable and configure Anti-Virus and Anti-Bot blades - Malware detection and botnet communication blocking |
| IPS Protections | 20% | - Testing and troubleshooting IPS - Enable, configure and update IPS protections
|
| Policy Layers and Rules | 10% | - Rule configuration with custom profiles - Structure and manage layered policies |
| Performance and Optimization | 10% | - Performance analysis and tuning - Null profiles and panic button protocol |
| Logs, Analysis and Troubleshooting | 15% | - Analyze logs and traffic patterns - Exceptions, exclusions and penalty box - SmartEvent configuration and monitoring |
| Threat Prevention Policy Profiles | 15% | - Create and configure custom profiles - Integrate Anti-Bot, Anti-Virus and IPS settings - Profile application and validation |
| Threat Prevention Foundations | 10% | - Security environment verification and connectivity - Evolution and core concepts of threat prevention |
IT職員の一員として、目前のCheckPointの156-590試験情報を明らかに了解できますか？もし了解しなかったら、心配する必要がありません。我々社Topexamは試験政策の変化に応じて、CheckPointの156-590問題集をタイムリーに更新しています。こうした、お客様に完備かつ高品質の156-590試験資料を提供できます。
質問 # 71
Which process is responsible for communication with the Check Point ThreatCloud for the sake of Anti-Virus Protection Update?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is A. The CPAS Daemon (cpasd) . In the course-guide context, cpasd is the process associated with Anti-Virus communication toward Check Point ThreatCloud for protection-update and classification purposes. The functional reason is that Anti-Virus file inspection depends on Check Point's ThreatSpect and ThreatCloud intelligence pipeline. Check Point documentation explains that each Security Gateway has a Malware database and a local cache; when the cache has no answer, it queries the ThreatCloud repository. For Anti-Virus, the signature is sent for file classification.
The ThreatCloud network is dynamically updated and distributes attack information that can convert zero-day attack data into known signatures that Anti-Virus can block. This explains why the communication process matters: AV enforcement is not limited to a static local signature set; it relies on cloud-assisted reputation, classification, and continuously updated intelligence. The distractors do not match this function. RAD is mainly associated with resource categorization and URL/Application intelligence. pslavd is not the ThreatCloud update communication process named in this question. ted belongs to Threat Emulation, not Anti-Virus protection updates. Reference topics: Anti-Virus, CPAS/cpasd, ThreatCloud repository, Malware database, local cache, file classification.
質問 # 72
What is the impact of changing the Preconfigured Threat Prevention Profiles?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A. The best practice for all Check Point delivered profiles and object is to first clone them and work on the clones . Check Point's out-of-the-box Threat Prevention profiles are predefined baselines intended to provide known security and performance behavior. The official Threat Prevention Profiles documentation states that administrators can create a clone of a selected profile and then make changes, but they cannot change the out-of-the-box profiles: Basic, Optimized, and Strict . The documented workflow is to right-click the profile, select Clone , rename the copied profile, configure settings, and then install policy.
This is the correct operational model because vendor-delivered profiles are reference baselines. Modifying production enforcement should be done in a cloned profile so that the original baseline remains available for comparison, rollback, and troubleshooting. Option B is incorrect because deleting predefined profiles and rebuilding from scratch is unsafe and unnecessary. Option C is not the standard best-practice answer; performance impact should be managed by profile criteria and IPS tuning, not by a separate "performance check tool" workflow in this question. Option D is incorrect because profile changes can materially affect both security posture and gateway performance. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Profiles, Basic/Optimized
/Strict profiles, profile cloning, policy installation, IPS tuning baseline.
質問 # 73
Which is NOT true of Threat Prevention policy application?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is B. Traffic is matched against all applicable layers at the same time . Threat Prevention policy evaluation is not best described as a flat simultaneous match against all applicable layers.
Check Point documentation explains that Threat Prevention Policy Layers are Ordered Layers , and that each ordered layer calculates its action separately from the other layers. In a single-layer policy package, the enforced rule is the first matched rule. In multiple-layer policy behavior, matching and enforcement are determined by the layer calculations and the applicable action logic, rather than by one undifferentiated simultaneous match model.
Option A is true because Threat Prevention inspection is applied after the Access Control policy allows the connection; traffic dropped or rejected by Access Control does not proceed to Threat Prevention enforcement.
Option C is true for a single Threat Prevention layer because the first matching rule is enforced. Option D is also true because Threat Prevention uses ordered policy-layer behavior. The false statement is therefore option B. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Policy, Ordered Layers, first-match rule behavior, Access Control before Threat Prevention, multi-layer enforcement logic.
質問 # 74
Task: Create and enable a custom IPS protection in SmartConsole.
正解：
解説：
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Go to Threat Tools > IPS Protections > New Protection.
2- Define the protection name, CVE ID (if applicable), and description.
3- Choose protection type (e.g., protocol anomaly, port scanning).
4- Set an action to "Prevent" or "Detect."
5- Save it and apply it to a custom profile.
質問 # 75
What happens to traffic that matches the Access Control Policy but not the Threat Prevention Policy?
正解：A
質問 # 76
......
ユーザーエクスペリエンスとクライアントのフィードバックを優先します。156-590実践ガイドは、常にサービスを改善し、バージョンを更新してクライアントの利便性を高め、満足させるようにします。 156-590トレーニング資料に関するクライアントの満足度は、前進を続ける原動力の源です。 156-590ガイド資料を理解できるようになりました。 156-590認定に関する知識の主流の微妙な変更はすべてキャッチされ、利用可能な156-590学習資料リソースの検索に最善を尽くします。
156-590日本語学習内容: https://www.topexam.jp/156-590_shiken.html