P.S. Free & New Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by DumpsReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EtDy_CIXW_fsXzQyE2B0qfILo6Z1ouq5
The Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice test software also keeps a record of attempts, keeping users informed about their progress and allowing them to improve themselves. This feature makes it easy for Plat-Arch-204 desktop-based practice exam software users to focus on their mistakes and overcome them before the original attempt. Overall, the Windows-based Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice test software has a user-friendly interface that facilitates candidates to prepare for the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam without facing technical issues.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice, Multiple-select |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce B2C Solution Architect Salesforce System Architect |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
>> Plat-Arch-204 Customizable Exam Mode <<
The Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) web-based practice test works on all major browsers such as Safari, Chrome, MS Edge, Opera, IE, and Firefox. Users do not have to install any excessive software because this Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice test is web-based. It can be accessed through any operating system like Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, or Mac. Another format of the practice test is the desktop software. It works offline only on Windows. Our Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) desktop-based practice exam software comes with all specifications of the web-based version.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 45
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has recently changed its Corporate Security Guidelines. The guidelines require that all cloud applications pass through a secure firewall before accessing on-premise resources. NTO is evaluating middleware solutions to integrate cloud applications with on-premise resources and services. Which consideration should an integration architect evaluate before choosing a middleware solution?12
Answer: C
Explanation:
In modern enterprise architecture, securing the boundary between cloud environments like Salesforce and on-premise data centers is a critical responsibility of the Integration Architect. When Corporate Security Guidelines mandate that all traffic must pass through a secure firewall, the architecture must support a Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) or "Perimeter Network" strategy.
An API Gateway or a specialized middleware connector acts as the "front door" for these on-premise resources. The architect must evaluate whether the chosen middleware solution supports a distributed deployment model where the gateway component can reside within the DMZ. This setup allows the organization to terminate external (cloud) connections in a hardened environment before the traffic is inspected and proxied to the internal, trusted network.
While supporting OAuth (Option C) is essential for modern authentication, it does not satisfy the specific network-level firewall requirement described. Similarly, ODBC connections (Option B) are low-level database protocols that usually operate deep within the internal network and would typically be considered a security risk if exposed directly to a firewall.
By ensuring the middleware has an architecturally compatible gateway for the DMZ, the architect provides a solution that allows for deep packet inspection, IP whitelisting, and rate limiting at the edge of the corporate network. This approach aligns with the "Defense in Depth" principle, ensuring that Salesforce can securely communicate with legacy systems (like SAP or internal databases) without exposing those systems directly to the public internet, thereby satisfying the new Corporate Security Guidelines.
NEW QUESTION # 46
An integration architect has designed a mobile application for Salesforce users to get data while on the road using a custom user interface (UI). The application is secured with OAuth and is currently functioning well. There is a new requirement where the mobile application needs to obtain the GPS coordinates and store them on a custom geolocation field. The geolocation field is secured with field-level security, so users can view the value without changing it. What should be don4e to meet the requirement?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When a custom mobile application already secured with OAuth needs to update a record in Salesforce, the standard architectural recommendation is to use the REST API. The REST API is optimized for mobile environments because it uses lightweight JSON payloads and follows standard HTTP methods (such as PATCH for updates), which are highly compatible with mobile development frameworks.
In this specific scenario, the architect must address the Field-Level Security (FLS) constraint. Because the geolocation field is set to read-only for users, a standard UI-based update would typically fail. However, when using an inbound REST API call with a properly authorized integration user or via a "System Mode" context (if utilizing a custom Apex REST resource), the system can be configured to bypass UI-level restrictions while maintaining data integrity.
The mobile device captures the coordinates via the device's native GPS capabilities and initiates an inbound call to the Salesforce REST endpoint. Option A (Apex inbound call) is a subset of REST functionality but is only necessary if complex server-side logic is required that the standard REST API cannot handle. Option C is technically incorrect as mobile devices do not typically "receive" callouts from Salesforce in this pattern; they initiate the requests. By leveraging the standard REST API, the architect ensures a scalable, secure, and standardized integration that adheres to Salesforce's mobile-first integration principles.
NEW QUESTION # 47
A business requires automating the check and updating of the phone number type classification for all incoming calls. Up to 100,000 calls per day are received, and the business is flexible with timing (every 6-12 hours is sufficient). A Remote-Call-In and/or Batch Synchronization pattern via middleware is planned. Which component should an integration architect recommend to implement these patterns?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a Remote-Call-In or Batch Synchronization pattern where an external middleware initiates the connection to Salesforce, the external system must be authenticated. The standard Salesforce framework for this is the Connected App.
A Connected App provides a framework for external applications to integrate with Salesforce using APIs and standard protocols like OAuth 2.0. For a high-volume (100,000 records) batch process initiated by middleware every 6-12 hours, the architect would recommend a Connected App using a secure flow, such as the OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Flow. This allows the middleware to authenticate as a specific "Integration User" without storing clear-text passwords.
Option A (API Gateway) is used to manage and secure outbound calls from Salesforce or between external services; it does not handle inbound authentication to the Salesforce org itself. Option B (Remote Site Settings) is a whitelist configuration used purely to allow Salesforce to make outbound callouts to a specific URL; it provides no authentication mechanism for systems calling into Salesforce. By recommending a Connected App, the architect ensures that the middleware has the necessary permissions (scopes) to use the Bulk API-which is the appropriate mechanism for the 100,000 record volume-while maintaining a secure, auditable, and standard integration boundary.
NEW QUESTION # 48
A company has an external system that processes and tracks orders. Sales reps manage their leads and opportunity pipeline in Salesforce. The company decided to integrate Salesforce and the Order Management System (OMS) with minimal customization and code. Sales reps need to see order history in real-time. The legacy system is on-premise and connected to an ESB. There are 1,000 reps creating 15 orders each per shift, mostly with 20-30 line items. How should an integration architect integrate the two systems based on these requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To meet the requirements of minimal customization, low developer resources, and real-time visibility without data replication, the architect should utilize Salesforce Connect with External Objects and an OData connector.
Salesforce External Objects allow the OMS data to be viewed within Salesforce as if it were stored natively, but the data remains in the on-premise system. This fulfills the requirement for sales reps to see "up-to-date information" because every time they view the record, Salesforce Connect fetches the latest data via the ESB's OData endpoint. This Data Virtualization pattern is the most efficient choice for real-time history where users only need to view the data occasionally.
Options A and B involve Data Replication via ETL, which would store the order data inside Salesforce. Given the volume (15,000 orders/shift with 25 line items each = 375,000 records daily), this would rapidly consume Salesforce data storage limits and require significant custom development for the ETL logic and REST APIs. Furthermore, ETL is typically batch-oriented and would not provide the true "real-time" view requested. By using an OData connector, the architect leverages a declarative, "no-code" solution that satisfies the timeline constraints and provides immediate access to order details and line items without the cost of data storage.
NEW QUESTION # 49
Northern Trail Outfitters submits orders to a manufacturing system web service that has experienced multi-day outages. Which solution should an integration architect recommend to handle errors during these types of outages?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When a target system experiences prolonged outages (lasting "several days"), point-to-point integration solutions built within Salesforce are likely to fail or reach their retry limits. For example, Salesforce Outbound Messaging (Option B) only retries for up to 24 hours before dropping the message.
The architecturally robust solution is to introduce a Middleware layer (ESB or iPaaS) that provides queuing and buffering. In this model, Salesforce sends the order to the middleware. The middleware immediately acknowledges receipt (preserving Salesforce performance). If the manufacturing system is offline, the middleware stores the message in a persistent queue.
Middleware is designed for this high level of Quality of Service (QoS). It can be configured with custom retry logic-such as waiting 30 minutes between attempts-and can hold millions of messages for days or even weeks. This effectively "insulates" Salesforce from the manufacturing system's instability. Option C is overly complex and requires custom development in both the event bus and Apex, whereas middleware provides this functionality as a native capability. By using middleware, the architect ensures that no orders are lost during extended manufacturing downtime and that the integration is decoupled and resilient.
NEW QUESTION # 50
......
Practice Plat-Arch-204 Tests: https://www.dumpsreview.com/Plat-Arch-204-exam-dumps-review.html
BONUS!!! Download part of DumpsReview Plat-Arch-204 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EtDy_CIXW_fsXzQyE2B0qfILo6Z1ouq5