2026年Jpexamの最新Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect PDFダンプおよびDevelopment-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=161jLIyIS4DFlmssZkP6Xr7q62GhDPCzY
顧客様と販売者の間での信頼性は苦労かつ大切なことだと良く知られます。誠意をみなぎるSalesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect試験備考資料は我々チームの専業化を展示されるし、最完全の質問と再詳細の解説でもって試験に合格するのを助けるます。同時的に、皆様の認可は我々仕事の一番良い評価です。
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect |
| Exam Number: | Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Does not expire |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Select, Multiple Choice |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Technical Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center |
| Pre Condition: | No formal prerequisites |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailheadacademy.salesforce.com/certificate/exam-dev-lifecycle---Plat-Arch-202 |
>> Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architectテスト資料 <<
Jpexamのトレーニング資料はあなたが試験の準備をしている知識をテストできて、一定の時間にあなたのパフォーマンスを評価することもできますから、あなたの成績と弱点を指示して、弱い点を改善して差し上げます。JpexamのSalesforceのDevelopment-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect試験トレーニング資料はさまざまなコアロジックのテーマを紹介します。そうしたら知識を習得するだけでなく、色々な技術と科目も理解できます。我々のトレーニング資料は実践の検証に合格したもので、資料の問題集が全面的で、価格が手頃ということを保証します。
Salesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architectは、Salesforceの開発、展開、およびライフサイクル管理における専門知識とスキルを持つプロフェッショナルの能力を認定する権威ある認定試験です。この認定は、Salesforceアプリケーションやソリューションの管理と展開を担当するアーキテクト、開発者、および管理者を対象としています。認定試験では、候補者のSalesforce開発ライフサイクルと展開の様々な分野における知識と熟練度をテストします。
質問 # 196
Universal Containers (UC) has multiple development teams that work on separate streams of work, with different timelines. Each stream has different releases of code and config, and thedelivery dates differ between them.
What is a suitable branching policy to recommend?
正解：A
解説：
A suitable branching policy to recommend for multiple development teams that work on separate streams of work, with different timelines, is trunk-based development. This policy allows each team to work on their own feature branches, and merge them to the main branch (trunk) frequently, using pull requests and code reviews. This can help avoid merge conflicts, ensure code quality, and enable continuous integration and delivery. Leaf-based development is not a valid branching policy, as it is a term used to describe the nodes in a tree data structure. GitHub flow is a specific implementation of trunk-based development, but it is not a branching policy by itself. Scratch-org-based development is not a branching policy, but a development model that uses scratch orgs as ephemeral environments. See Trunk-Based Development for more details.
質問 # 197
Universal Containers operates from North America and does business within North America. UC has just acquired a local company in Asia to start operating from Asia. Currently, these two business units operate in two different languages. Both units have different sales processes and have to comply strictly with local laws.
During the expansion phase, UC would like to focus on innovation over standardization. What should an architect recommend given the scenario?
正解：A
解説：
The best option for UC given the scenario is to opt for a multi-org strategy, where each org can have its own sales process, common rules, and operate in locale. A multi-org strategy can accommodate the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A multi-org strategy can also allow for more innovation and flexibility, as each org can customize and optimize its own functionality. A single-org strategy may not be able to support the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A single-org strategy may also limit the innovation and flexibility, as the org has to follow a standardized and consistent approach.
質問 # 198
A developer with Universal Containers recently created a flow in the developer sandbox. While working on the flow, the developer deactivated it and made updates multiple times before the flow worked as desired. Now the developer is planning to use a change set to migrate the flow to the QA sandbox.
What two statements should be considered when migrating the flow with change sets?
Choose 2 answers
正解：A、C
解説：
When migrating a flow with change sets, the following statements should be considered: When a change set with a multiple versioned flow is uploaded, it includes only the active version of the flow. When a change set with a multiple versioned flow is uploaded, and no active version is available, it includes the most recent inactive version of the flow. These statements are based on the Salesforce documentation on how change sets handle flows with multiple versions. The other statements are incorrect, as they do not reflect the actual behavior of change sets.
質問 # 199
Universal Containers uses multiple Salesforce orgs for its different lines of business (LOBs). In a recent analysis, the architect found that UC could have a more complete view of its customers by gathering customer data from different orgs.
What two options can an architect recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view?
Choose 2 answers
正解：A
解説：
Implementing a Hub-and-Spoke multi-org strategy by consolidating customer data in a single org, which will be the master of customer data, and using integration strategies to let the LOBs orgs read and write from it is one of the options an architect can recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view. This way, the architect can ensure that there is a single source of truth for the customer data, and that the data is consistent and synchronized across the different orgs. Implementing a Single Package multi-org strategy by developing and deploying to all orgs a managed package which reads and consolidates customer 360-degree view from the different orgs is another option an architect can recommend, as it allows the architect to create a reusable and scalable solution that can provide a unified view of the customer data from multiple sources.
Implementing a Complete Graph multi-org strategy or migrating from multi-org to single-org strategy are not feasible or optimal options, as they can introduce complexity, cost, or risk to the architecture.
質問 # 200
Universal Containers (\)C) is on the Unlimited Edition of Salesforce orgs. Currently, there are four Developer Pro sandboxes used by dev teams for various purposes, one partial copy sandboxes used for training, one full sandbox used for user acceptance testing. There is another full sandbox used for performance testing during the initial launch, and it is no longer being actively used.
A system administrator had reported yesterday that none of the sandboxes can be refreshed.
What is the most probable action an architect can help the system administrator with?
正解：D
質問 # 201
......
Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect試験関連情報: https://www.jpexam.com/Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect_exam.html
さらに、Jpexam Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architectダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=161jLIyIS4DFlmssZkP6Xr7q62GhDPCzY