BONUS!!! Download part of TestKingIT Plat-Admn-201 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WtZY6SRe_3qxGsW7IX3vZedH3EF0Twxa
We offer free demos of the Plat-Admn-201 exam braindumps for your reference before you pay for them, for there are three versions of the Plat-Admn-201 practice engine so that we also have three versions of the free demos. And we will send you the new updates if our experts make them freely. On condition that you fail the exam after using our Plat-Admn-201 Study Guide unfortunately, we will switch other versions for you or give back full of your refund. All we do and the promises made are in your perspective.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Administrator |
| Exam Number: | ADM-201 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Advanced Administrator Salesforce Certified Application Architect Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Designer |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multi-Select |
| Available Languages: | Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, English |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Exam Price: | $200 USD |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Admn-201 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored exam at authorized testing centers or through online proctoring |
| Pre Condition: | No formal prerequisites required; recommended to have 6 months to 1 year of hands-on Salesforce administration experience; completing the Salesforce Administrator Trailhead modules is highly recommended |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/administrator |
>> Reliable Plat-Admn-201 Exam Voucher <<
TestKingIT provides the most reliable and authentic Salesforce Certified Platform Administrator (Plat-Admn-201) prep material there is. The 3 kinds of Salesforce Plat-Admn-201 preparation formats ensure that there are no lacking points in a student when he attempts the actual Plat-Admn-201 exam. The Salesforce Certified Platform Administrator (Plat-Admn-201) exam registration fee varies between 100$ and 1000$, and a candidate cannot risk wasting his time and money, thus we ensure your success if you study from the updated Salesforce Plat-Admn-201 practice material. We offer the demo version of the actual Salesforce Plat-Admn-201 questions so that you may confirm the validity of the product before actually buying it, preventing any sort of regret.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
| Topic 7 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 106
The Cloud Kicks CFO requires any opportunity over $100,000 to be automatically sent to them, so they can sign off on the record before the deal closes. Which feature should a Platform Administrator use to fulfill this requirement?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The requirement to have a record "signed off" by a specific individual (the CFO) based on a dollar threshold is a classic use case for an Approval Process . While the "Submit for Approval" button (Option A) allows a user to manually start the process, the prompt specifies that the process should happen "automatically"50. To achieve this automation, the Platform Administrator should use Flow Builder to trigger the approval process . A Record-Triggered Flow can be set to run when an Opportunity is created or updated and meets the criteria (Amount > $100,000) . The flow would then use the "Submit for Approval" action to launch the record into the predefined approval process without requiring the sales rep to click a button . Einstein Next Best Action (Option B) is a recommendation tool, not a workflow enforcement tool54. Apex Triggers (Option C) could perform this task, but Salesforce best practices recommend using "clicks not code" (Flow) whenever possible for such requirements . Using Flow to launch an Approval Process provides the necessary automation, routing, and audit trail the CFO requires
NEW QUESTION # 107
Cloud Kicks has three teams of customer service reps that use a custom field on the Case object to populate the team assigned to manage the tickets. The customer support manager would like a Custom Dashboard to show data specific to each team. What should a Platform Administrator do to meet this requirement? 55
Answer: D
Explanation:
To avoid the administrative burden of creating and maintaining multiple identical dashboards for different teams, a Platform Administrator should use Dashboard Filters. By adding a filter based on the "Team Assigned" custom field, the administrator can create a single dashboard that the manager can toggle between "Team A," "Team B," and "Team C". Each time a filter value is selected, all components on the dashboard that use that field (or a mapped equivalent) will automatically refresh to show the data relevant only to that team. Creating separate dashboards (Option A) is inefficient and leads to "dashboard sprawl". Adding specific widgets for every team on one dashboard (Option B) would result in a cluttered and confusing interface61. Cross Filters (Option D) are a reporting feature used to filter records based on their relationship to other objects, not a dashboard-level viewing tool.
NEW QUESTION # 108
Once an opportunity reaches the negotiation stage at Cloud Kicks, the Amount field becomes required for sales users. Sales managers need to be able to move opportunities into this stage without knowing the amount. How should a Platform Administrator require this field during the negotiation stage for sales users but allow their managers to make changes?
Answer: D
Explanation:
A Validation Rule is the only way to enforce conditional requirement logic based on both record data (the stage) and user data (the user's profile or role). To achieve this, the Platform Administrator would write a formula that checks three things: if the Stage is "Negotiation," if the Amount field is blank, and if the user is not a manager. The formula would look something like:
AND(ISPICKVAL(StageName, "Negotiation"), ISBLANK(Amount), $Profile.Name <> "Sales Manager"). This allows the system to block standard sales users from saving the record without an amount, while the exception for the manager's profile allows them to bypass the requirement.
Making the field required on the page layout (Option A) would affect all users equally, failing to meet the requirement for managers. Assigning the Admin profile to managers (Option B) is a major security risk and violates the principle of least privilege.
NEW QUESTION # 109
The VP of sales at Cloud Kicks has a standard sales profile and is receiving an error message that prevents them from saving an opportunity. A Platform Administrator attempted the same edit without receiving an error. How should the administrator troubleshoot this issue?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When a specific user encounters an error that an administrator cannot replicate, the most effective troubleshooting technique is to "Login as" that user. This feature, which must be enabled in the organization's login policies, allows the administrator to see exactly what the user sees and experience the system through their specific profile, role, and sharing permissions. This is vital for identifying issues related to Validation Rules, Field-Level Security, or Record-Triggered Flows that might only trigger under specific user contexts. Logging in as a system administrator (Option A) is ineffective because administrators often bypass certain restrictions that apply to standard users. Asking for a password (Option D) is a major security violation and is never required in Salesforce. By using the "Login as" feature, the admin can pinpoint whether the error is caused by the user's data input or a specific permission conflict assigned to their profile.
NEW QUESTION # 110
Universal Containers has two sales teams, sales team A and sales team B. Each team has their own role in the role hierarchy. Both roles are subordinates of the same Manager role. How should a Platform Administrator share records owned by sales team A with sales team B?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In this scenario, the two teams are "peers" in the role hierarchy (both reporting to the same manager). In a private sharing model, peers cannot see each other's records by default. To grant lateral access between these specific groups, an Owner-based Sharing Rule is the most effective solution. The administrator can create a rule stating that any records owned by members of
"Role: Sales Team A" should be shared with members of "Role: Sales Team B" with specific access levels (e.g., Read/Write). Hierarchical sharing (Option C) only grants upward visibility to the Manager role, not across to the other team. Manual sharing (Option D) is inefficient for an entire team. Criteria-based sharing (Option A) is used when record field values determine access, whereas this requirement is based specifically on who owns the records.
NEW QUESTION # 111
......
Plat-Admn-201 Pass Exam: https://www.testkingit.com/Salesforce/latest-Plat-Admn-201-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Admn-201 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestKingIT: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WtZY6SRe_3qxGsW7IX3vZedH3EF0Twxa