ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인기덤프문제 - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN시험패스가능한공부자료

BONUS!!! PassTIP ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dfopyrvChzCM4bnCzASMQrJktFTIN9CR

PassTIP전문가들은PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인증시험만을 위한 특별학습가이드를 만들었습니다.PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인증시험을 응시하려면 30분이란 시간만 투자하여 특별학습가이드로 빨리 관련지식을 장악하고,또 다시 복습하고 안전하게PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인증시험을 패스할 수 잇습니다.자격증취득 많은 시간과 돈을 투자한 분들보다 더 가볍게 이루어졌습니다

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 中文 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Information Security Controls (ISO/IEC 27002:2022)25%- Control categories and implementation guidance
  • 1. Technological controls
    • 2. Organizational controls
      • 3. Physical controls
        • 4. People controls
          Fundamental Concepts of Information Security15%- Information security principles and definitions
          • 1. Risk management fundamentals
            • 2. Confidentiality, integrity, availability
              - Overview of ISO/IEC 27000 family of standards
              • 1. Relationship between ISO/IEC 27001 and other standards
                • 2. Structure and scope of ISO/IEC 27000 series
                  Auditing Principles and Practices30%- Audit reporting and follow-up
                  • 1. Structure and content of audit report
                    • 2. Corrective action verification and closure
                      - Audit preparation and planning
                      • 1. Development of audit plan and checklist
                        • 2. Defining audit scope, criteria and methodology
                          - Audit concepts and principles
                          • 1. Independence, objectivity and evidence-based approach
                            • 2. Audit types and objectives
                              - Audit execution
                              • 1. Collecting and verifying audit evidence
                                • 2. Conducting interviews and document reviews
                                  • 3. Identifying nonconformities and opportunities for improvement
                                    Requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:202230%- Support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement
                                    • 1. Corrective action and continual improvement
                                      • 2. Internal audit and management review
                                        • 3. Resource management and competence
                                          - General requirements and ISMS scope definition
                                          • 1. Determining ISMS boundaries and applicability
                                            • 2. Understanding the organization and its context
                                              - Leadership and planning
                                              • 1. Management commitment and policy establishment
                                                • 2. Information security objectives and risk treatment planning

                                                  >> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인기덤프문제 <<

                                                  최신 업데이트버전 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN인기덤프문제 인증덤프

                                                  요즘 같은 인재가 많아지는 사회에도 많은 업계에서는 아직도 관련인재가 부족하다고 합니다.it업계에서도 이러한 상황입니다.PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN시험은 it인증을 받을 수 있는 좋은 시험입니다. 그리고PassTIP는PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN덤프를 제공하는 사이트입니다.

                                                  최신 ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN 무료샘플문제 (Q232-Q237):

                                                  질문 # 232
                                                  您是經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊領導,指導審核員進行培訓。她詢問您審核報告中不合格項的分級。您決定透過詢問她以下哪四個陳述是正確的來測試她的知識。

                                                  정답:A,B,C,E

                                                  설명:
                                                  The four statements that are true are:
                                                  * Major nonconformities may be subject to on-site follow up
                                                  * The action taken to address major nonconformities is typically more substantial than the action taken to address minor nonconformities
                                                  * Several minor nonconformities can be grouped into a major nonconformity
                                                  * Nonconformities may be graded to indicate their significance
                                                  According to ISO 19011:2018, a nonconformity is the non-fulfilment of a requirement1. Nonconformities may be graded to indicate their significance, based on the criteria established by the audit programme or the audit client2. The grading of nonconformities may use different terms or levels, such as major, minor, critical, etc., depending on the nature and context of the audit3. However, some common definitions of major and minor nonconformities are:
                                                  * A major nonconformity is a nonconformity that affects the ability of the management system to achieve its intended results, or that represents a significant breakdown of the management system4. Major nonconformities may require immediate corrective action and on-site follow up by the auditor to verify their closure5.
                                                  * A minor nonconformity is a nonconformity that does not affect the ability of the management system to achieve its intended results, or that represents an isolated lapse of the management system4. Minor nonconformities may require corrective action within a specified time frame and off-site verification by the auditor to confirm their closure5.
                                                  The action taken to address nonconformities depends on the severity and impact of the nonconformity, and the risk of recurrence or escalation. Typically, the action taken to address major nonconformities is more substantial than the action taken to address minor nonconformities, as it may involve identifying and eliminating the root cause of the problem, implementing preventive measures, and monitoring the effectiveness of the solution.
                                                  Several minor nonconformities can be grouped into a major nonconformity if they are related to the same requirement, process, or area, and if they indicate a systemic failure or a significant risk to the management system. The auditor should use professional judgment and evidence-based approach to decide whether to group or report nonconformities individually.
                                                  The other statements are false, based on the guidance of ISO 19011:2018. For example:
                                                  * Option B is false, because nonconformities can be graded using different terms or levels, depending on the criteria established by the audit programme or the audit client2. The terms 'major' and 'minor' are not mandatory or universal, but rather examples of possible grading levels3.
                                                  * Option D is false, because very minor nonconformities should not be re-graded as opportunities for improvement, but rather reported as nonconformities, as they still represent a non-fulfilment of a requirement1. An opportunity for improvement is a suggestion for enhancing the performance or effectiveness of the management system, but it is not a nonconformity or a requirement.
                                                  * Option F is false, because the grading of nonconformities does not have to be explained to the auditee at the opening meeting, but rather at the closing meeting, where the audit findings and conclusions are presented and discussed. The opening meeting is intended to provide an overview of the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and methods, and to confirm the audit arrangements and logistics.
                                                  * Option G is false, because the auditee is not always responsible for determining the criteria for grading nonconformities, but rather the audit programme or the audit client, in consultation with the auditee and other relevant parties2. The auditee is responsible for taking corrective action to address the nonconformities, and for providing evidence of their completion and effectiveness.


                                                  질문 # 233
                                                  您正在對位於歐洲的住宅進行 ISMS 審核
                                                  名為 ABC 的療養院提供醫療保健服務。您會發現所有療養院居民都戴著電子腕帶,用於監控他們的位置、心跳和血壓。您了解到,電子腕帶會自動將所有資料上傳到人工智慧(AI)雲端伺服器,供醫護人員進行健康監測和分析。
                                                  審核計畫的下一步是驗證高階管理人員是否已製定資訊安全策略和目標。
                                                  在審計過程中,你們發現以下審計證據。
                                                  將審核證據與 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 中的相應要求進行配對。

                                                  정답:

                                                  설명:


                                                  질문 # 234
                                                  您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核員,目前正在為正在接受首次初始認證審核的 ISMS 審核員提供支援。她問您在審核組織的資訊安全目標時應該驗證什麼。您詢問她在審核清單中包含了哪些內容,她提供了以下答案。
                                                  對於 ISO/IEC 27001 的符合性,您會擔心以下哪三個答案:
                                                  2022 年?

                                                  정답:B,E,F

                                                  설명:
                                                  According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 6.2 requires an organization to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels1. The objectives should be consistent with the information security policy; measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated; monitored; communicated; updated as appropriate1. Therefore, when auditing an organization's information security objectives, an ISMS auditor should verify these aspects in accordance with the audit criteria.
                                                  Three responses from the ISMS auditor in training that would cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are:
                                                  * I am going to check that top management have determined the Information Security objectives for the current year. If not, I will check that this task has been programmed to be completed: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels, not just at the top management level. It also implies that the auditor in training is willing to accept a delay or postponement in determining the information security objectives, which may affect the ISMS performance and effectiveness.
                                                  * I am going to check that the Information Security objectives are written down on paper so that everyone is clear on what needs to be achieved, how it will be achieved, and by when it will be achieved: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that are measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated, not just written down on paper. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the flexibility and suitability of different media or formats for documenting and communicating information security objectives, such as electronic or digital records, posters, newsletters, etc.
                                                  * I am going to check that a completion date has been set for each objective and that there are no objectives with missing 'achieve by' dates: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that are monitored, not just completed by a certain date. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the possibility and necessity of updating information security objectives as appropriate, such as when changes occur in the internal or external context of the organization, or when new risks or opportunities arise.
                                                  The other responses from the ISMS auditor in training are acceptable and do not cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022. For example, checking how each Information Security objective has been communicated to those who need to be aware of it in order for the objective to be achieved is relevant to verifying the communication aspect of clause 6.2; checking that there is a process in place to periodically revisit Information Security objectives, with a view to amending or cancelling them if circumstances necessitate this is relevant to verifying the updating aspect of clause 6.2; checking that the necessary budget, manpower and materials to achieve each objective has been determined is relevant to verifying the planning aspect of clause 6.2; checking that all the Information Security objectives are measurable. If they are not measurable the organisation will not be able to track progress against them is relevant to verifying the measurability aspect of clause 6.2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements


                                                  질문 # 235
                                                  ------------- 與其他重要業務資產一樣,該資產對組織有價值,因此需要受到保護。

                                                  정답:A

                                                  설명:
                                                  Information is an asset like other important business assets, as it has value to an organization and consequently needs to be protected. Information can be in any form, such as electronic, paper, or verbal. Information security is the protection of information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) | CQI | IRCA


                                                  질문 # 236
                                                  作為審計員,您已經注意到 ABC Inc. 已製定了管理可移動儲存媒體的程序。該程式基於 ABC Inc. 採用的分類方案。另一方面,被歸類為「公共」的資訊沒有保密要求:因此,僅適用確保其完整性和可用性的程序。這是什麼類型的審計結果?

                                                  정답:C

                                                  설명:
                                                  This scenario represents a conformity because ABC Inc. has implemented procedures for managing removable storage media that align with the classification scheme of the information stored. When information is classified as "confidential," more stringent procedures apply, whereas for "public" information, the procedures focus only on integrity and availability, following the organization's defined information classification policy.


                                                  질문 # 237
                                                  ......

                                                  PassTIP에는 베터랑의전문가들로 이루어진 연구팀이 잇습니다, 그들은 it지식과 풍부한 경험으로 여러 가지 여러분이PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN시험을 패스할 수 있을 자료 등을 만들었습니다, PassTIP 에서는 일년무료 업뎃을 제공하며, PassTIP 의 덤프들은 모두 높은 정확도를 자랑합니다. PassTIP 선택함으로 여러분이PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN시험에 대한 부담은 사라질 것입니다.

                                                  ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN시험패스 가능한 공부자료: https://www.passtip.net/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-pass-exam.html

                                                  그 외, PassTIP ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN 시험 문제집 일부가 지금은 무료입니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dfopyrvChzCM4bnCzASMQrJktFTIN9CR