MogiExamのHuaweiのH35-831試験トレーニング資料を利用すれば、認定試験に合格するのは簡単になります。うちのHuaweiのH35-831試験トレーニング資料は豊富な経験を持っている専門家が長年の研究を通じて開発されたものです。MogiExamの学習教材は君の初めての試しでHuaweiのH35-831認定試験に合格するのに助けます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic O&M | 2% | - Monitoring and analysis - Fault management |
| High Reliability | 8% | - Fast protection switching - Network redundancy mechanisms - Fault detection and recovery |
| Network Orchestration & Automation | 2% | - iMaster NCE overview - SDN and controller architecture |
| IP Mobile Backhaul | 10% | - Synchronization and timing - 5G/4G backhaul architecture - Service isolation and QoS |
| Multicast Protocols | 6% | - Multicast QoS - PIM-SM/SSM - MSDP and anycast RP |
| VPN Technologies | 15% | - MPLS L3VPN - VPN deployment and troubleshooting - EVPN and VXLAN |
| Advanced Routing Protocols | 15% | - BGP and MP-BGP - OSPF advanced features - Route control and fast convergence - IS-IS advanced features |
| Cloud Bearer Network | 8% | - DC interconnect technologies - Cloud interconnection architecture - Cloud service bearer requirements |
| Backbone Network Planning | 8% | - Scalability design - Capacity and traffic planning - Architecture design |
| Tunnel Technologies | 15% | - TE and traffic engineering - MPLS fundamentals - SR-MPLS and SRv6 |
HuaweiのH35-831認定試験を一回合格するためには必ず良い準備しなければなりません。完全な知識がこの高度専門の試験に合格するのは必要でMogiExamは君にこれらの資源を完全な需要に備わっています。
質問 # 34
Which of the following are applications of BFD in a 5G transport network?
Select all that apply.
正解：A、B、C、D
解説：
Huawei Reference Verification:
Huawei carrier high-availability designs integrate BFD with VPN FRR, Segment Routing forwarding protection, MPLS TE hot standby and gateway redundancy. BFD sessions rapidly detect bidirectional loss of forwarding continuity and notify their associated routing or protection clients. TE tunnel BFD can activate VPN FRR; LSP-associated BFD can trigger a hot standby LSP; IGP-neighbor-associated BFD accelerates SR- BE protection response and routing convergence; interface-associated BFD may trigger VRRP or other active
/standby changes. BFD detects failure rather than computing the alternative path. These applications support all four answers.
Technical Deep Dive:
A, B, C and D are correct. BFD operates by exchanging lightweight control packets along the monitored path and declaring a failure after the configured detection threshold. The notification feeds an existing protection mechanism. On a TE tunnel BFD can initiate VPN FRR to a preinstalled alternate; on a TE LSP it may activate hot standby; on IGP neighbor sessions it accelerates the failure signal used by SR-BE FRR and route recalculation. At access or core boundaries, interface-associated BFD can support VRRP failover or active
/standby route switching. BFD alone does not construct a backup tunnel or compute a new shortest path. Its value is quick detection and a standardized notification interface. Use `display bfd session all` on VRP to inspect local sessions. Supported NP/ASIC hardware may accelerate BFD processing, enabling faster and more stable detection without requiring continual CPU intervention for each session.
#######################################################
質問 # 35
The new metro network is anticipated to converge fixed and mobile networks. In this type of network, every device must process services and forward data.
正解：A
解説：
Huawei Reference Verification:
Huawei CloudMetro differentiates network-service functions from the underlying physical forwarding infrastructure. Centralized service and resource management can coexist with distributed forwarding elements. The cloud-based BNG architecture demonstrates this specifically: the vBRAS control plane coordinates subscriber sessions, authentication-related procedures, and service policies, while vBRAS user- plane devices execute high-speed packet forwarding. Thus, sharing one fixed-mobile transport infrastructure does not imply that every intermediate network element must perform subscriber service processing. The architecture assigns distinct responsibilities to control, service-edge, and transit forwarding components.
Technical Deep Dive:
The statement is FALSE. Fixed-mobile convergence requires a coordinated network, not identical service functionality in every router. Service-edge devices including MSEs and BNGs may terminate subscribers, allocate addresses, enforce policies, or maintain customer VPN state. Transit devices primarily carry traffic between access, aggregation, and backbone nodes. An MPLS P router can switch labels without hosting customer VPN routing tables. Likewise, an IPv6 transit router can forward an SRv6 packet by its IPv6 destination without executing the SID's endpoint service behavior. CUPS further separates control-plane subscriber management from data-plane forwarding. Routing CPUs calculate state and install entries, while NP/ASIC forwarding engines conduct line-rate lookups, encapsulation, policing, and queue management.
Independent scaling of subscriber-control systems and packet-forwarding resources is one of the architecture's major advantages. Therefore, the assertion that every device must both process services and forward data is too broad.
#######################################################
質問 # 36
The figure illustrates the fixed-broadband cloudification acceleration scenario of the intelligent cloud- network. Which statements about this network are incorrect?
Exhibit 16.1 - Original topology/configuration figure
Select all that apply.
正解：C、D
解説：
Huawei Reference Verification:
Huawei's SRv6 network design separates the public transport plane, which must provide locator and loopback reachability, from VPN service-route advertisement. IS-ISv6 can flood infrastructure IPv6 routes and the relevant SRv6 locator reachability among metro and aggregation routers. BGP over the inter-AS service relationship distributes the VPN routes. An EBGP VPN session is not the public-plane IGP mechanism intended for locator distribution in the diagram, and IS-ISv6 does not substitute for the private-plane BGP advertisement of VPN routes and service SIDs. Accordingly C and D are the incorrect statements.
Technical Deep Dive:
C and D are incorrect. In the shown metro/cloud interconnection the public network plane supplies transport reachability for packet forwarding, while the private plane distributes customer VPN information. IS-ISv6 carries IPv6 infrastructure reachability such as loopback and SRv6 locator prefixes, allowing transit forwarding toward SID locators. BGP distributes VPN routes and service-related SID attributes. Thus A correctly describes underlay IS-ISv6, and B describes the intended EBGP-based service route exchange. C incorrectly assigns the locator-distribution role to public-plane EBGP for this design, and D incorrectly assigns private VPN SID distribution to the IGP. A locator is the routable portion of an SRv6 SID; the function encodes service behavior such as End.DT4/End.DT6. Forwarding ASICs use IPv6 FIB entries to carry packets toward locators, while egress PE SID processing selects the VPN behavior.
#######################################################
質問 # 37
In the network shown, RT4 and RT5 function as ASBRs and import IS-IS routes into OSPF. Only OSPF is used for interworking between RT4 and RT5. The link costs are shown in the figure. The key configurations of RT4 and RT5 are as follows:
Exhibit 36.1 - Original topology/configuration figure
Exhibit 36.2 - Original topology/configuration figure
正解：D
解説：
Huawei Reference Verification:
Huawei OSPF External Type 2 route selection considers the external metric first; when E2 metrics are equal, internal cost toward the advertising ASBR serves as an additional comparison. RT4 and RT5 import the IS-IS destination as OSPF Type 2 external routes with the explicitly configured external metric of 10. The illustrated OSPF paths to RT4 and RT5 have equal internal cost from RT1. Therefore RT1 installs two equal- cost forwarding paths to 6.6.6.6. The differing IS-IS link costs to RT6 do not override the imported OSPF Type 2 metric. Thus B is correct.
Technical Deep Dive:
B is correct. RT4 and RT5 are ASBRs because they inject routes learned in IS-IS into OSPF. Both use
`import-route isis 1 cost 10 type 2`. As a result the advertised E2 cost for 6.6.6.6 is 10 from either ASBR. RT1 can reach RT4 through RT2 and RT5 through RT3, and the illustrated internal OSPF costs for those alternatives are equal. The two paths therefore qualify for ECMP, unlike a single preferred next hop. The original IS-IS costs (20 on the RT4 side and 10 on RT5) are internal to the source routing domain; they are not the metric used after the explicit E2 import cost is assigned. Huawei commands `display ospf routing`,
`display ospf lsdb ase` and `display ip routing-table 6.6.6.6` help confirm the route type and next hops. ASIC forwarding can distribute traffic across installed ECMP entries.
#######################################################
質問 # 38
The new metro network is built with modular, standardized components. It is designed for fixed-mobile convergence (FMC) and cloud-network integration requirements, and it enables flexible network expansion, rapid service provisioning, and network intelligence.
正解：B
解説：
Huawei Reference Verification:
Huawei's official CloudMetro solution architecture describes a metropolitan network built around a Network Cloud Engine (NCE) and an underlying bearer infrastructure capable of providing differentiated end-to-end network services. The design separates functional modules, cloud operating systems, and physical forwarding resources into independently manageable layers. Service management and network-resource control are centralized, while modular network functions can be orchestrated according to subscriber and application requirements. This approach enables flexible resource scheduling, automated provisioning, simplified service deployment, and more efficient operations and maintenance. These capabilities substantiate the statement that the new metro network supports flexible expansion, fixed-mobile convergence, cloud-network integration, and intelligent service management.
Technical Deep Dive:
The statement is TRUE because modern carrier metro networks are evolving from device-centric architectures to service-oriented and programmable transport infrastructures. Traditional metro designs often combine subscriber management, service processing, and forwarding in individual physical devices, creating complexity when expanding capacity or adding services. CloudMetro addresses these limitations using functional modularization, control and forwarding separation, and centralized service orchestration. Fixed- mobile convergence enables residential broadband, enterprise VPNs, and mobile backhaul to share common transport resources while maintaining separate VPN and QoS policies. Cloud-network integration supports coordinated allocation of compute, storage, and connectivity. Rather than manually configuring each device, network functions and connectivity can be provisioned through centralized policies. On supported NetEngine platforms, forwarding processors and ASICs perform IP lookups, MPLS label operations, ACL matching, classification, and QoS scheduling. Combining modularity, high-performance hardware forwarding, and centralized service control provides rapid service activation, predictable scaling, and lower operational complexity.
#######################################################
質問 # 39
......
Huawei H35-831試験を難しく感じる人に「やってもいないのに、できないと言わないこと」を言いたいです。我々MogiExamへのHuawei H35-831試験問題集は専業化のチームが長時間で過去のデータから分析研究された成果で、あなたを試験に迅速的に合格できるのを助けます。依然躊躇うなら、弊社の無料のHuawei H35-831デモを参考しましょう。そうしたら、Huawei H35-831試験はそんなに簡単なことだと知られます。
H35-831資格講座: https://www.mogiexam.com/H35-831-exam.html