P.S. Free 2026 The Open Group OGEA-102 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Braindumpsqa: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14awdmv3hQalPICCzrzEkZUSVceyS_fXW
The staffs of our OGEA-102 training materials are all professionally trained. If you have encountered some problems in using our products, you can always seek our help. Our staff will guide you professionally. If you are experiencing a technical problem on the system, the staff at OGEA-102 Practice Guide will also perform one-on-one services for you. And we work 24/7 online so that you can contact with us at anytime no matter online or via email on the questions of the OGEA-102 exam questions.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Context for Enterprise Architecture | 10-15% | - Enterprise architecture principles and scope - Enterprise architecture value and benefits - Business and IT alignment |
| Requirements Management | 10-15% | - Requirements traceability and management - Integration with ADM phases - Requirements capture and classification |
| Stakeholder Management | 15-20% | - Stakeholder engagement and communication - Managing concerns and requirements - Stakeholder identification and classification |
| Architecture Development Method (ADM) Phases | 30-35% | - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - Phase D: Technology Architecture - Phase H: Architecture Change Management - Phase G: Implementation Governance - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - Phase A: Architecture Vision - Phase B: Business Architecture - Phase F: Migration Planning |
| ADM Application and Tailoring | 10-15% | - Scaling and adapting the framework - Tailoring ADM for different contexts - Using ADM with other frameworks |
| Architecture Governance | 10-15% | - Governance frameworks and processes - Compliance and decision management - Architecture maturity models |
All these OGEA-102 exam dumps formats contain real, updated, and error-free TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102) exam questions that prepare you for the final OGEA-102 exam. To give you an idea about the top features of OGEA-102 Exam Dumps, a free demo download facility is being offered to TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam candidates. This free OGEA-102 exam questions demo download facility is available in all three OGEA-102 exam dumps formats.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Scenario
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a global company that sells consumer products. The company produces many products that buyers use and enjoy.
The company has announced a major change to its products that will occur over a four-year period. This change includes the introduction of digital products and services. An architecture to support this strategy has been finished, along with a roadmap for a set of projects to implement this significant change. This will be a cross-functional effort between the product design and software teams. It is planned to be developed in phases.
The company faces a challenge in presenting and providing access to different services through its products and digital platforms while ensuring compliance with data privacy laws. In some countries and regions, the data residency requirements mean that the company has to store certain data within the region where it is collected. As a result, the company's application portfolio and infrastructure must connect with various cloud services and data repositories in different countries.
The EA team has inherited the architecture used by the current products, some of which can be carried over to the new products. The EA team has started to define which parts of the architecture to carry forward. Enough of the Business Architecture has been defined so that work can commence on the Information Systems and Technology Architectures. Those architectures need to be defined to support the key digital services that the company plans to provide.
The company uses the TOGAF Standard as the foundation for its Enterprise Architecture framework, and architecture development follows the purpose-based EA Capability model outlined in the TOGAF Series Guide: A Practitioner's Approach to Developing Enterprise Architecture Following the TOGAF ADM. The EA team reports to the Chief Information Officer (CIO), who oversees the program.
You have been asked how to decide and organize the work to deliver the requested architectures.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The company is in the process of delivering requested architectures to support the introduction of digital products and services. The Business Architecture is sufficiently defined, and the focus is on developing the Information Systems and Technology Architectures.
TOGAF emphasizes breaking down large, complex transformation programs into manageable projects, focusing on dependencies, risks, trade-offs, and sequencing of efforts. Based on the scenario, the company must deal with:
Data privacy and residency compliance across different regions.
Re-use of existing architecture for efficiency.
Alignment of digital services with a global roadmap.
The activity described aligns with ADM Phases B (Business Architecture), C (Information Systems Architecture), and D (Technology Architecture), with a focus on delivering architectures for implementation.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Refers to developing high-level architecture descriptions and identifying reference architectures and candidate building blocks, which align with ADM Phases B, C, and D.
Addresses feasibility analysis, trade-offs, and stakeholder engagement, which are part of architecture development and decision-making in TOGAF.
Ensures that the architecture descriptions are resource-conscious, including cost and value analysis, dependencies, risks, and synergies between projects.
Conclusion: Correct, as it provides a complete approach to organizing the work to deliver architectures while adhering to TOGAF principles.
Option B:
Strengths:
Suggests creating architecture descriptions for the Application, Data, and Technology Architectures, which are necessary for delivering requested architectures.
Addresses readiness assessments and the fitness of solutions.
Weaknesses:
Emphasizes looking outside the company and studying other companies' models, which is not necessarily aligned with TOGAF unless justified by specific gaps.
Skips essential TOGAF steps like feasibility analysis and detailed stakeholder engagement.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it places undue emphasis on external research instead of leveraging TOGAF's structured ADM.
Option C:
Strengths:
Suggests reviewing the Architecture Vision and determining scope, which aligns with TOGAF principles.
Proposes preparing an Architecture Roadmap and involving the Architecture Board for review.
Weaknesses:
Does not cover important elements such as candidate building blocks, feasibility analysis, or stakeholder engagement.
Suggests starting the project prematurely without proper sequencing or risk trade-offs.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it skips key steps and lacks a structured approach to dependencies and resource management.
Option D:
Strengths:
Suggests revising the Architecture Vision and conducting a Stakeholder Analysis, which aligns with Phase A of the ADM.
Weaknesses:
Returning to Phase A is not required here, as the Architecture Vision has already been defined. Revising the vision at this stage indicates a step backward.
Lacks focus on feasibility analysis, dependencies, and sequencing, which are the immediate needs in this phase.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it unnecessarily revisits earlier ADM phases instead of progressing.
TOGAF References
ADM Phases B, C, D: Emphasizes developing detailed architectures, identifying candidate building blocks, and addressing dependencies, risks, and resource needs (TOGAF 9.2, Chapters 8-10).
Architecture Roadmap and Feasibility Analysis: Guides sequencing and trade-offs for implementation (TOGAF 9.2, Section 12.4).
Stakeholder Engagement: Critical for ensuring alignment and feasibility (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Decision-Making and Trade-offs: TOGAF emphasizes documenting risks and trade-offs as part of feasibility analysis (TOGAF 9.2, Section 6.4.1).
NEW QUESTION # 16
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect working at a vehicle manufacturing company. The company specializes in buses and coaches. You are part of an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team that has responsibilities across multiple divisions of the company. EA provides the company with a comprehensive framework to develop and manage their manufacturing infrastructure, processes for component production, and design and testing systems.
The company has a corporate strategy that focuses on switching to electric power for its vehicles. It has invested heavily in a new standardized design, production efforts, and major components to use across all its product range. The company has multiple manufacturing plants in North America, Europe, and in Asia.
Customer demand has caused a backlog of orders because many customers want to have more environmentally friendly public transportation. There are not enough electronic components available, which is making it hard to produce products and meet customer demand. To address this issue, the company has started making the battery packs themselves and has hired new suppliers.
The EA team is working on a project to improve the process and systems to design, produce, and test the battery pack. As part of putting the new battery pack into production, changes to the assembly processes need to be made. A trial has been completed at a single location. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the project, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan to roll out these changes to all plants.
Preliminary Architecture Contracts are being developed to detail the work needed to put in place the new processes for each location. The EA team leader has called a meeting to discuss the contracts. It is emphasized that the Architecture Contract will serve as the key connection between architecture and implementation organizations.
The company mixes internal teams with a few third-party contractors at the locations.
The Chief Engineer is worried that the implementation and deployment will not be consistent and of satisfactory quality.
The company has an established EA practice. It uses the TOGAF standard as the foundation for its work including the internal EA framework. Additionally, the company uses various management frameworks such as business planning, project management, and operations management.
Refer to the scenario
The EA team leader asks you how you would address the Chief Engineer ' s concern.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Chief Engineer is concerned that implementation across multiple plants and mixed teams (internal + contractors) may be inconsistent and of poor quality.
The question asks: How should Architecture Contracts be used to address this concern according to the TOGAF standard?
TOGAF states that an Architecture Contract must:
Define obligations of both architecture and implementation organizations Specify metrics, measures, acceptance criteria, and success factors Identify risks and mitigation Support Architecture Governance through compliance reviews Apply to BOTH internal teams and external suppliers (external contracts must be legally enforceable) Option C is the only one that correctly reflects these TOGAF requirements.
# Why Option C is correct
1. Architecture Contracts must specify goals, measures, acceptance terms, and risks TOGAF explicitly states that Architecture Contracts should include:
Statement of Architecture Work
Performance metrics and measures
Acceptance criteria
Risks and issues
Compliance and conformance requirements
Option C includes all of these.
2. Third-party contracts must be legally enforceable
True - TOGAF states that when external suppliers are involved, Architecture Contracts often take the form of legally binding contracts.
Option C:
"Third-party contracts must be legally enforceable."
Correct.
3. Compliance reviews must be scheduled
TOGAF's Architecture Governance Framework prescribes scheduled Architecture Compliance Reviews to ensure that implementation conforms to the Architecture Contract.
Option C:
"establish a schedule of compliance reviews at key points"
Correct - this directly addresses the Chief Engineer's concern about consistency and quality.
4. Deviations must be reviewed by the Architecture Board and any dispensations should be time-bound TOGAF allows dispensations but requires:
Formal review
Approval by the Architecture Board
Time-bound accommodations rather than permanent exceptions
Option C includes exactly this guidance.
NEW QUESTION # 17
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect within a clinical research and health technologies company. The company is dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF standard.
In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management
frameworks in use. The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as the preferred approach for projects.
Many of the company's rivals have begun using Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current roles?
How can Al enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How can Al offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals. Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
Refer to the scenario
You have been assigned to the architecture development and asked how to address the concerns and manage risk for the project. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In this scenario you are right at the start of an ADM cycle: a Request for Architecture Work has been approved to investigate AI, and there are strong stakeholder concerns and risk questions. According to the TOGAF standard, the correct place to start is Phase A: Architecture Vision, with a strong focus on stakeholder management and capturing their concerns and required views.
Option A is the only answer that correctly reflects this:
Stakeholder analysis & Stakeholder Map (Phase A core task)
TOGAF explicitly states that in Phase A you must:
Identify stakeholders
Analyze and group them by common concerns
Use a Stakeholder Map to understand their influence, interest, and required engagement Determine which views/viewpoints are needed to address their concerns in the architecture description coe.qualiware.com+1 Option A says:
"analysis of the stakeholders ... define groups of stakeholders who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document." This is exactly how TOGAF describes stakeholder management and views in Phase A:
Stakeholder Map to classify and prioritize stakeholders
Concerns and required views captured and traced
These elements feeding into the Architecture Vision deliverable Visual Paradigm TOGAF+1 Concerns, views, and Architecture Vision TOGAF emphasizes that architecture views are constructed to address specific stakeholder concerns; you do not just build generic models. opengroup.org+1 Option A explicitly links concerns → views → Architecture Vision, which aligns with TOGAF guidance for early phases.
Capturing this in the Architecture Vision provides a high-level, shared understanding of what the AI initiative is trying to achieve and how stakeholder issues (e.g., responsible AI, risk processes, change in way of working) will be addressed.
Risk management and "architecting with agility"
In the scenario, the CIO has encouraged architecting with agility. TOGAF is compatible with incremental and iterative development of the target architecture, especially when there is high uncertainty and risk. conexiam.com Option A includes:
"a requirement that there be progressive development of the target architecture to ensure there is regular feedback." This "progressive development" and frequent feedback loop is exactly how you mitigate risk in an AI-heavy, change-sensitive initiative:
Frequent stakeholder feedback
Early validation of assumptions
Ability to adjust scope, constraints, and principles as risk and understanding evolve This directly addresses management's worry about the change in the way of working and whether risk management and responsible AI policies are adequate: these become explicit stakeholder concerns and requirements that are iteratively refined.
Why the other options are weaker / not TOGAF-aligned as a starting point Option B Focuses mainly on a Communications Plan and powerful stakeholders.
While TOGAF does expect a stakeholder communications plan, it is derived from a proper stakeholder analysis and Stakeholder Map, not a substitute for it.
It also treats risk as a "component of the architecture" rather than something to be addressed early through stakeholder concerns, principles, and iteration.
Option C
Jumps straight to a solution concept diagram and benefits diagram and defers risk evaluation to when the Architecture Roadmap is defined (Phase E).
In TOGAF, risk and stakeholder concerns must be addressed already in Phase A and refined throughout, not postponed to roadmap development.
Option D
Proposes creating draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology models and putting them into the Architecture Vision.
This is too detailed for the starting point: Phase A is about high-level vision, not full draft core architecture models (those belong in Phases B, C, D).
It also doesn't emphasize Stakeholder Mapping and grouping by concerns, which is central to resolving the worries about way of working, risk, and responsible AI.
In summary, Option A is the best and TOGAF-consistent way to begin:
Start in Phase A: Architecture Vision
Perform stakeholder analysis and create a Stakeholder Map
Define stakeholder concerns and relevant views
Record them in the Architecture Vision
Add an explicit requirement for progressive (iterative) development of the target architecture for continuous feedback and risk mitigation
NEW QUESTION # 18
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You have been appointed as Chief Enterprise Architect (CEA). reporting to the Chief Technical Officer (CTO), of a company established as a separate operating entity by a major automotive manufacturer. The mission of the company is to build a new industry leading unified technology and software platform for electric vehicles.
The company uses the TOGAF Standard as the basis for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) framework, and architecture development follows the purpose-based EA Capability model as described in the TOGAF Series Guide: A Practitioners ' Approach to Developing Enterprise Architecture Following the TOGAF ADM.
An end-to-end Target Architecture has been completed with a roadmap for change over a five-year period.
The new platform will be a cross-functional effort between hardware and software teams, with significant changes over the old platform. It is expected to be developed in several stages over three years. The EA team has inherited the architecture for the previous generation hardware and software automotive platform, some of which can be carried over to the new unified platform. The EA team has started to define the new platform, including defining which parts of the architecture to carry forward.
Enough of the Business Architecture has been defined, so that work can commence on the Information Systems and Technology Architectures. Those need to be defined to support the core business services that the company plans to provide. The core services will feature an innovative approach with swarm data generated by vehicles, paving the way for autonomous driving in the future.
The presentation and access to different variations of data that the company plans to offer through its platform pose an architecture challenge. The application portfolio and supporting infrastructure need to interact with various existing cloud services and data- Refer to the scenario You have been asked what approach should be taken to determine and organize the work to deliver the requested architectures?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Target Architecture is a description of the future state of the architecture that addresses the business goals and drivers, and satisfies the stakeholder requirements and concerns. The Target Architecture is developed through the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture. The Target Architecture is typically divided into four domains: Business, Data, Application, and Technology. The Target Architecture also includes a roadmap for change, which defines the Transition Architectures, the Capability Increments, and the work packages that enable the transition from the Baseline Architecture to the Target Architecture12 The best answer is B, because it describes the approach that should be taken to determine and organize the work to deliver the requested architectures, which are the Information Systems and Technology Architectures.
The answer covers the following steps:
* Refer to the end-to-end Target Architecture for guidance and direction. The end-to-end Target Architecture provides the overall vision, scope, and objectives of the architecture work, and the alignment with the business strategy and goals. The end-to-end Target Architecture also provides the high-level definitions and principles for the four architecture domains, and the roadmap for change that outlines the major milestones and deliverables.
* Identify projects, dependencies and synergies, then prioritize before initiating the projects. Projects are the units of work that implement the architecture work packages, which are the sets of actions or tasks that are required to implement a specific part of the architecture. Dependencies are the relationships and constraints that affect the order or priority of the projects, such as logical, temporal, or resource dependencies. Synergies are the benefits or advantages that result from the combination or coordination of the projects, such as cost savings, efficiency gains, or innovation opportunities. Prioritization is the process of ranking the projects according to their importance, urgency, or value, and assigning resources and schedules accordingly.
* Develop high-level architecture descriptions. High-level architecture descriptions are the outputs of the architecture development phases (B, C, and D) of the ADM cycle, which describe the Business, Data, Application, and Technology Architectures in terms of the Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) and the Solution Building Blocks (SBBs), which are reusable components of business, IT, or architectural capability. High-level architecture descriptions also include the Architecture Views, which are representations of the system of interest from the perspective of one or more stakeholders and their concerns.
* For each project, estimate effort size, identify reference architectures, and candidate building blocks.
Effort size is the measure of the amount of work, time, or resources required to complete a project.
Effort size can be estimated using various techniques, such as analogy, expert judgment, parametric, or bottom-up. Reference architectures are standardized architectures that provide a common framework and vocabulary for a specific domain or industry. Reference architectures can be used as a source of best practices, patterns, and models for the architecture development. Candidate building blocks are the potential ABBs or SBBs that can be used to implement the architecture. Candidate building blocks can be identified from the Architecture Repository, which is a collection of architecture assets, such as models, patterns, principles, standards, and guidelines.
* Identify the resource needs considering cost and value. Resource needs are the specifications and criteria that define the acceptable level and quality of the resources required to complete the project, such as human, financial, physical, or technological resources. Resource needs can be identified by analyzing the scope, complexity, and dependencies of the project, and the availability, capability, and suitability of the resources. Cost and value are the factors that influence the allocation and utilization of the resources, such as the budget, the return on investment, the benefits, or the risks.
* Document options, risks, and controls to enable viability analysis and trade-off with the stakeholders.
Options are the alternative ways of achieving the project objectives, such as different solutions, technologies, vendors, or approaches. Risks are the effects of uncertainty on the project objectives, such as threats or opportunities. Controls are the measures or actions that are taken to prevent, reduce, or mitigate the risks, such as policies, procedures, or standards. Viability analysis is the process of evaluating and comparing the options, risks, and controls, and determining the feasibility, suitability, and desirability of each option. Trade-off is the decision outcome that balances and reconciles the multiple, often conflicting, requirements and concerns of the stakeholders, and ensures alignment with the Architecture Vision and the Architecture Principles.
1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 5:
Introduction to the ADM 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part IV: Architecture Content Framework, Chapter 36: Building Blocks : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 18: Phase A: Architecture Vision : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 19: Phase B: Business Architecture : The TOGAF Standard, Version
9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 20: Phase C: Information Systems Architectures : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 21: Phase F: Migration Planning : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 23: Architecture Principles : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Trade-Off Analysis : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI:
Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 46: Tools for Architecture Development : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 47: Architecture Board : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 48: Architecture Compliance : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 49:
Architecture Contract : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 50: Architecture Governance : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 51: Architecture Maturity Models : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI:
Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 52: Architecture Skills Framework
NEW QUESTION # 19
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect at a company. The company manages large-scale farming operations with food production, processing, and distribution. The goal of the company is to maximize profit while satisfying the needs of consumers for its products. Its customers demand food that is produced sustainably, safely, and transparently, while reducing environmental impact.
The business is highly mechanized, and this mechanization has brought about a decrease in the number of workers needed, together with a focus on agricultural engineering to improve the efficiency of its farms, its processing facilities, and the overall enterprise. As part of this, the company has established an Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice based on the TOGAF standard, using it as the method and guiding framework. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of EA practice.
The practice has adopted an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision makers to have valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
In recent years there have been a series of bad harvests, and a major reduction in yields of the main crop produced by the company. This combined with an increase in costs for energy, feed, fuel, and fertilizer, had led to a significant decrease in profits.
The rising costs and lower profits mean that the company is unable to take as much planned action on climate measures as it would like, such as reducing its carbon footprint. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has stated that big changes are needed to improve yields and profitability.
The outline strategy for change, includes new products, and new markets. The company will switch to a mix of crops rather than depend on a main crop and will allow use of its processing facilities by third parties. This is a major decision, and the CEO has stated a desire to repurpose and reuse rather than replace so as to manage the risks and limit the costs.
The CIO has assigned the EA team to manage this project. The CIO has stated that although the overall objective is known, the EA team are expected to define the scope, a shared vision, and the requirements.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to recommend the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO ' s change in direction for the company.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The scenario clearly states that:
* The overall objective is known,
* BUT the EA team is expected to define the scope, shared vision, and requirements,
* The company uses an iterative approach,
* The CEO wants repurpose and reuse rather than replace,
* This is a major strategic shift (new markets, new products, new crop mix).
According to the TOGAF standard, when the problem must be understood, and scope, vision, and requirements are not yet defined, the correct starting point is Phase A: Architecture Vision, using an iteration cycle.
This is also consistent with the "baseline-first" approach recommended in the TOGAF Series Guides for situations where:
* the business direction is known but high-level,
* detailed impacts must be discovered,
* and the organization wants to reuse existing capabilities rather than replace them.
Option B is the only answer that:
* Begins by understanding the problem,
* Defines the structure of the change,
* Uses iteration cycles starting with a baseline-first approach,
* Leads into transition planning,
* Supports clarification of the shared vision and requirements,
* Fits the CIO's instruction to "define the scope, shared vision, and requirements." This matches exactly what TOGAF prescribes in early-cycle Architecture Vision and initial iterations.
NEW QUESTION # 20
......
If you want to enter a better company and double your salary, a certificate for this field is quite necessary. We can offer you such opportunity. OGEA-102 study guide materials of us are compiled by experienced experts, and they are familiar with the exam center, therefore the quality can be guaranteed. In addition, OGEA-102 Learning Materials have certain quantity, and it will be enough for you to pass the exam and obtain the corresponding certificate enough. We have a professional service stuff team, if you have any questions about OGEA-102 exam materials, just contact us.
OGEA-102 Test Questions: https://www.braindumpsqa.com/OGEA-102_braindumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Braindumpsqa OGEA-102 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14awdmv3hQalPICCzrzEkZUSVceyS_fXW