Test Data-Engineer-Associate Testking - Realistic Amazon Test AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Testking 100% Pass

What's more, part of that EduDump Data-Engineer-Associate dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_srxvm0YhsRESlHEjIJaFYdYRMjp3zAg

EduDump offers you a free demo version of the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps. This way candidates can easily check the validity and reliability of the Data-Engineer-Associate exam products without having to spend time. This relieves any sort of anxiety in the candidate's mind before the purchase of AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) certification exam preparation material. This Data-Engineer-Associate Exam study material is offered to you at a very low price. We also offer up to 1 year of free updates on Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps after the date of purchase. Going through our AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) exam prep material there remains no chance of failure in the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam.

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Data Ingestion and Transformation34%- Transform and enrich data
  • 1. Use Spark, EMR, Step Functions
  • 2. Orchestrate data pipelines
  • 3. Apply data processing logic
- Implement data quality and validation
- Ingest data from various sources
  • 1. Batch and streaming data ingestion
  • 2. Use services like Kinesis, DMS, Glue, S3
Data Security and Governance18%- Protect sensitive data
- Implement access control and authentication
  • 1. IAM, Lake Formation, resource policies
- Enforce compliance and data governance
  • 1. Data lineage, audit logging, regulatory requirements
- Encrypt data at rest and in transit
Data Store Management26%- Optimize storage performance and cost
- Design and implement data storage solutions
  • 1. Data lakes, data warehouses, databases
  • 2. S3, Redshift, DynamoDB, RDS, Lake Formation
- Manage data lifecycle and storage tiers
Data Operations and Support22%- Ensure reliability and scalability
- Automate operational tasks
- Backup, restore, and disaster recovery
- Monitor and troubleshoot data pipelines
  • 1. CloudWatch, X-Ray, logging and metrics

>> Test Data-Engineer-Associate Testking <<

Pass Guaranteed 2026 Amazon Professional Data-Engineer-Associate: Test AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Testking

The only goal of all experts and professors in our company is to design the best and suitable Data-Engineer-Associate study materials for all people. According to the different demands of many customers, they have designed the three different versions of the Data-Engineer-Associate certification study guide materials for all customers: PDF, Soft and APP versions. They sincerely hope that all people who use Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions from our company can pass the Data-Engineer-Associate exam and get the related certification successfully. And our pass rate for Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions is high as more than 98%.

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q158-Q163):

NEW QUESTION # 158
A company needs to use an AWS Glue PySpark job to read specific data from an Amazon DynamoDB table.
The company knows the partition key values for the required records. The existing processing logic of the AWS Glue PySpark job requires the data to be in DynamicFrame format. The company needs a solution to ensure that the job reads only the specified data.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the MINIMUM number of read capacity units (RCUs)?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is optimized for Query operations, which retrieve items efficiently using the partition key and optionally the sort key. Queries consume significantly fewer RCUs than Scan operations because only matching partitions are read.
By performing a Query using the partition key in the key condition expression, the AWS Glue job reads only the required items directly from DynamoDB. This minimizes the number of read capacity units consumed and avoids unnecessary reads.
Using a Scan operation, even when followed by filtering in a DynamicFrame, consumes RCUs for the entire table or index and is highly inefficient. Using only the sort key in a query is invalid without the partition key and would not meet DynamoDB query requirements. The Glue DynamoDB connector filter option still performs a scan under the hood and does not minimize RCUs.
The queried data can be directly loaded into a DynamicFrame, satisfying the existing processing logic requirement without additional transformations.
Therefore, Option D provides the most efficient and cost-effective solution.


NEW QUESTION # 159
A company uploads .csv files to an Amazon S3 bucket. The company's data platform team has set up an AWS Glue crawler to perform data discovery and to create the tables and schemas.
An AWS Glue job writes processed data from the tables to an Amazon Redshift database. The AWS Glue job handles column mapping and creates the Amazon Redshift tables in the Redshift database appropriately.
If the company reruns the AWS Glue job for any reason, duplicate records are introduced into the Amazon Redshift tables. The company needs a solution that will update the Redshift tables without duplicates.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

Answer: A

Explanation:
To avoid duplicate records in Amazon Redshift, the most effective solution is to perform the ETL in a way that first loads the data into a staging table and then uses SQL commands like MERGE or UPDATE to insert new records and update existing records without introducing duplicates.
Using Staging Tables in Redshift:
The AWS Glue job can write data to a staging table in Redshift. Once the data is loaded, SQL commands can be executed to compare the staging data with the target table and update or insert records appropriately. This ensures no duplicates are introduced during re-runs of the Glue job.
Reference:
Alternatives Considered:
B (MySQL upsert): This introduces unnecessary complexity by involving another database (MySQL).
C (Spark dropDuplicates): While Spark can eliminate duplicates, handling duplicates at the Redshift level with a staging table is a more reliable and Redshift-native solution.
D (AWS Glue ResolveChoice): The ResolveChoice transform in Glue helps with column conflicts but does not handle record-level duplicates effectively.
Amazon Redshift MERGE Statements
Staging Tables in Amazon Redshift


NEW QUESTION # 160
A telecommunications company collects network usage data throughout each day at a rate of several thousand data points each second. The company runs an application to process the usage data in real time. The company aggregates and stores the data in an Amazon Aurora DB instance.
Sudden drops in network usage usually indicate a network outage. The company must be able to identify sudden drops in network usage so the company can take immediate remedial actions.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST latency?

Answer: A

Explanation:
The telecommunications company needs a low-latency solution to detect sudden drops in network usage from real-time data collected throughout the day.
Option B: Modify the processing application to publish the data to an Amazon Kinesis data stream. Create an Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) application to detect drops in network usage.
Using Amazon Kinesis with Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Kinesis Data Analytics) is ideal for real-time stream processing with minimal latency. Flink can analyze the incoming data stream in real-time and detect anomalies, such as sudden drops in usage, which makes it the best fit for this scenario.
Other options (A, C, and D) either introduce unnecessary delays (e.g., querying databases) or do not provide the same real-time, low-latency processing that is critical for this use case.
Reference:
Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for Apache Flink
Amazon Kinesis Documentation


NEW QUESTION # 161
A company has three subsidiaries. Each subsidiary uses a different data warehousing solution. The first subsidiary hosts its data warehouse in Amazon Redshift. The second subsidiary uses Teradata Vantage on AWS. The third subsidiary uses Google BigQuery.
The company wants to aggregate all the data into a central Amazon S3 data lake. The company wants to use Apache Iceberg as the table format.
A data engineer needs to build a new pipeline to connect to all the data sources, run transformations by using each source engine, join the data, and write the data to Iceberg.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational effort?

Answer: B

Explanation:
Amazon Athena provides federated query connectors that allow querying multiple data sources, such as Amazon Redshift, Teradata, and Google BigQuery, without needing to extract the data from the original source. This solution is optimal because it offers theleast operational effortby avoiding complex data movement and transformation processes.
* Amazon Athena Federated Queries:
* Athena's federated queries allow direct querying of data stored across multiple sources, including Amazon Redshift, Teradata, and BigQuery. With Athena's support for Apache Iceberg, the company can easily run a Merge operation on the Iceberg table.
* The solution reduces complexity by centralizing the query execution and transformation process in Athena using SQL queries.
Reference:Amazon Athena Federated Query
Alternatives Considered:
A (AWS Glue pipeline): This would work but requires more operational effort to manage and transform the data in AWS Glue.
C (Amazon EMR): Using EMR and writing PySpark code introduces more operational overhead and complexity compared to a SQL-based solution in Athena.
D (Amazon AppFlow): AppFlow is more suitable for transferring data between services but is not as efficient for transformations and joins as Athena federated queries.
References:
Amazon Athena Documentation
Federated Queries in Amazon Athena


NEW QUESTION # 162
A company has a frontend ReactJS website that uses Amazon API Gateway to invoke REST APIs. The APIs perform the functionality of the website. A data engineer needs to write a Python script that can be occasionally invoked through API Gateway. The code must return results to API Gateway.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Answer: C

Explanation:
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers.
You can use Lambda to create functions that perform custom logic and integrate with other AWS services, such as API Gateway. Lambda automatically scales your application by running code in response to each trigger. You pay only for the compute time you consume1.
Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows you to run and scale containerized applications on AWS. You can use ECS to deploy, manage, and scale Docker containers using either Amazon EC2 instances or AWS Fargate, a serverless compute engine for containers2.
Amazon EKS is a fully managed Kubernetes service that allows you to run Kubernetes clusters on AWS without needing to install, operate, or maintain your own Kubernetes control plane. You can use EKS to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications using Kubernetes on AWS3.
The solution that meets the requirements with the least operational overhead is to create an AWS Lambda Python function with provisioned concurrency. This solution has the following advantages:
It does not require you to provision, manage, or scale any servers or clusters, as Lambda handles all the infrastructure for you. This reduces the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It allows you to write your Python script as a Lambda function and integrate it with API Gateway using a simple configuration. API Gateway can invoke your Lambda function synchronously or asynchronously, and return the results to the frontend website.
It ensures that your Lambda function is ready to respond to API requests without any cold start delays, by using provisioned concurrency. Provisioned concurrency is a feature that keeps your function initialized and hyper-ready to respond in double-digit milliseconds. You can specify the number of concurrent executions that you want to provision for your function.
Option A is incorrect because it requires you to deploy a custom Python script on an Amazon ECS cluster.
This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to provision, manage, and scale your own ECS cluster, either using EC2 instances or Fargate. This increases the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It requires you to package your Python script as a Docker container image and store it in a container registry, such as Amazon ECR or Docker Hub. This adds an extra step to your deployment process.
It requires you to configure your ECS cluster to integrate with API Gateway, either using an Application Load Balancer or a Network Load Balancer. This adds another layer of complexity to your architecture.
Option C is incorrect because it requires you to deploy a custom Python script that can integrate with API Gateway on Amazon EKS. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to provision, manage, and scale your own EKS cluster, either using EC2 instances or Fargate. This increases the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It requires you to package your Python script as a Docker container image and store it in a container registry, such as Amazon ECR or Docker Hub. This adds an extra step to your deployment process.
It requires you to configure your EKS cluster to integrate with API Gateway, either using an Application Load Balancer, a Network Load Balancer, or a service of type LoadBalancer. This adds another layer of complexity to your architecture.
Option D is incorrect because it requires you to create an AWS Lambda function and ensure that the function is warm by scheduling an Amazon EventBridge rule to invoke the Lambda function every 5 minutes by using mock events. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It does not guarantee that your Lambda function will always be warm, as Lambda may scale down your function if it does not receive any requests for a long period of time. This may cause cold start delays when your function is invoked by API Gateway.
It incurs unnecessary costs, as you pay for the compute time of your Lambda function every time it is invoked by the EventBridge rule, even if it does not perform any useful work1.
References:
1: AWS Lambda - Features
2: Amazon Elastic Container Service - Features
3: Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service - Features
[4]: Building API Gateway REST API with Lambda integration - Amazon API Gateway
[5]: Improving latency with Provisioned Concurrency - AWS Lambda
[6]: Integrating Amazon ECS with Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Elastic Container Service
[7]: Integrating Amazon EKS with Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
[8]: Managing concurrency for a Lambda function - AWS Lambda


NEW QUESTION # 163
......

The Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions given in this desktop AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice exam software are equivalent to the actual AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam. The desktop Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate practice exam software can be used on Window based computers. If any issue arises, the EduDump support team is there to fix the issue. With more than thousands of satisfied customers around the globe, you can use the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Study Materials of EduDump with confidence.

Data-Engineer-Associate Valid Study Questions: https://www.edudump.com/exams/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate/

BONUS!!! Download part of EduDump Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_srxvm0YhsRESlHEjIJaFYdYRMjp3zAg