P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lOEEAfz1V1Mo_1TicGmPC1jcCsPLyK9E
we guarantee to you that our Plat-Arch-204 study questions are of high quality and can help you pass the exam easily and successfully. Our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions boosts 99% passing rate and high hit rate so you needn't worry that you can't pass the exam. Our Plat-Arch-204 Exam Torrent is compiled by experts and approved by experienced professionals and updated according to the development situation in the theory and the practice. Our Plat-Arch-204 guide torrent can simulate the exam and boosts the timing function.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> Pass Plat-Arch-204 Test Guide <<
Most of the Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps on the platform are out of reach for most users due to their high price. Visit the Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps if you want to buy real Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Questions at a good price. Start your Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam preparation with our exam practice questions.
NEW QUESTION # 49
A subscription-based media company's system landscape forces many subscribers to maintain multiple accounts and to log in more than once. An Identity and Access Management (IAM) system, which supports SAML and OpenId, was recently implemented to improve the subscriber experience through self-registration and single sign-on (SSO). The IAM system must integrate with Salesforce to give new self-service customers instant access to Salesforce Community Cloud.
Which requirement should Salesforce Community Cloud support for self-registration and SSO?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 50
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has an affiliate company that would like immediate notifications of changes to opportunities in the NTO Salesforce Instance. The affiliate company has a CometD client available. Which solution is recommended in order to meet the requirement?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To provide near real-time notifications to a client that already supports CometD, an Integration Architect should leverage the Streaming API. While Platform Events are a modern alternative, PushTopic Events are specifically designed to stream changes to Salesforce records based on a defined SOQL query.
A PushTopic event is triggered when a record is created, updated, deleted, or undeleted. By creating a PushTopic on the Opportunity object, NTO defines the criteria (fields and record states) that should trigger a message to the 1subscriber. The affiliate's CometD client can then subscribe to this topic's channel (e.g., /topic/OpportunityUpdates) to receive the data payload instantly.
Option A is incorrect because "Accept CometD API Requests" is not a standard checkbox or configuration within a Connected App; authentication is handled via standard OAuth flows, but the streaming channel must still be defined. Option C describes a Polling mechanism, which is the architectural opposite of the requested "immediate notification" and would unnecessarily consume SOAP API limits while introducing latency. By using a PushTopic, NTO ensures a decoupled, event-driven architecture that scales effectively for notification-only use cases while respecting the technical capabilities of the affiliate's existing CometD-compatible infrastructure.
NEW QUESTION # 51
A company accepts payment requests 24/7. Once the company accepts a payment request, its service level agreement (SLA) requires it to make sure each payment request is processed by its Payment System. The company tracks payment requests using a globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The company's simplified flow is as shown in the diagram.
The company encounters intermittent update errors when two or more processes try to update the same Payment Request record at the same time. Which recommendation should an integration architect make to improve the company's SLA and update conflict handling?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In high-concurrency environments like 24/7 payment processing, a common architectural failure is "race conditions," where multiple threads attempt to update the same record simultaneously. To resolve this while strictly adhering to a Service Level Agreement (SLA), the Integration Architect must shift the responsibility of orchestration to a central "nervous system"-the Middleware (e.g., MuleSoft or an ESB).
According to Salesforce Integration best practices, Middleware coordination is essential for managing the state and sequencing of asynchronous messages. By having the Middleware coordinate request delivery, it can implement a "Sequential Processing" or "First-In-First-Out" (FIFO) queue logic. This ensures that even if the Data Entry Point pushes requests at high speed, the Middleware can throttle or serialize the calls to the Payment System, preventing the record-locking errors and update conflicts mentioned in the scenario.
Furthermore, the globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point allows the Middleware to perform Idempotency checks. If a duplicate request arrives or an error occurs, the Middleware can use this ID to verify the status before attempting another update, ensuring that the "exactly-once" processing requirement of the SLA is met without creating duplicate payment records or conflicting status updates.
While Option B suggests retries-which are necessary for a "Fire-and-Forget" pattern-retrying without central coordination often exacerbates update conflicts rather than solving them. Option C (processing once) is a result of a well-designed system, but it does not provide the mechanism to handle the specific update conflicts described. By recommending that the Middleware coordinate the entire flow, the architect provides a robust solution that manages delivery, handles retries gracefully, and ensures data integrity across the system landscape.
NEW QUESTION # 52
Service agents at Northern Trail Outfitters use Salesforce to manage cases and B2C Commerce for ordering. Which integration solution should an architect recommend in order for the service agents to see order history from a business-to-consumer (B2C) Commerce system?
Answer: A
Explanation:
For a unified service experience between Salesforce Service Cloud and B2C Commerce (formerly Demandware), Salesforce provides a purpose-built, cross-cloud solution known as the Salesforce B2C Commerce to Service Cloud Connector.
This connector is part of the Salesforce B2C Solution Architecture and is designed to provide "out-of-the-box" synchronization of data between the two platforms. By implementing this connector, service agents gain several high-value capabilities within the Service Console:
Customer Profile Sync: Ensures that customer data (name, address, etc.) is consistent across both systems.
Order History View: Allows agents to see real-time order data from the Commerce system directly within the Case record page.
Order on Behalf Of: Enables agents to place orders for customers without leaving Salesforce.
While you could build a custom integration using the Commerce REST API (Option B) or MuleSoft (Option C), these would require significant development, testing, and maintenance effort. The Salesforce B2C Connector is the recommended "path of least resistance" because it leverages Salesforce's own pre-built logic for cross-cloud interoperability, reducing technical debt and time-to-value. For an architect, choosing the standard1 connector ensures better supportability and future-proofing 2as Salesforce continues to enhance its multi-cloud features.
NEW QUESTION # 53
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. The company has asked the integration architect to help fulfill such aspects with its Salesforce program. Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Salesforce is a highly capable CRM platform, but it is not a dedicated messaging or orchestration engine. When requirements include complex message queuing, process choreography, and guaranteed quality of service (QoS), the Integration Architect must recommend a middleware solution (ESB or iPaaS).
"True message queuing" involves holding messages in a persistent state until the target system is ready to receive them, handling sophisticated retry logic (such as exponential backoff), and providing dead-letter queues for failed messages. While Salesforce has basic asynchronous tools like Outbound Messaging or Platform Events, they lack the granular control over queuing and orchestration that enterprise middleware provides.
Option A is incorrect because performing heavy transformation and protocol translation (like XML to JSON or SOAP to REST) within Salesforce consumes excessive Apex CPU time and is better handled by middleware designed for that purpose. Option B is conceptually backward; usually, architects move away from synchronous Request-Reply toward asynchronous Fire-and-Forget to improve scalability. By recommending a middleware solution to handle these infrastructure-level concerns, the architect ensures that Salesforce remains performant for its users while the middleware manages the technical complexities of reliably connecting the enterprise.
NEW QUESTION # 54
......
It will improve your skills to face the difficulty of the Plat-Arch-204 exam questions and accelerate the way to success in IT filed with our latest study materials. Free demo of our Plat-Arch-204 dumps pdf can be downloaded before purchase and 24/7 customer assisting support can be access. Well preparation of Plat-Arch-204 Practice Test will be closer to your success and get authoritative certification easily.
Plat-Arch-204 Books PDF: https://www.passreview.com/Plat-Arch-204_exam-braindumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lOEEAfz1V1Mo_1TicGmPC1jcCsPLyK9E