P.S. Kostenlose 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von ITZert verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zC4BWxj3uVLtGvPqJM2f3Vzpvz3lAq_M
Während andere Leute in der U-Bahn erstarren, können Sie mit Pad die PDF Version von ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsunterlagen lesen. Während andere im Internet spielen, können Sie mit Online Test Engine der ECCouncil 312-97 trainieren. Wir glauben, dass so fleißig wie Sie sind, können Sie bestimmt in einer sehr kurzen Zeit die ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfung bestehen. Während andere noch über Ihre ausgezeichnete Erzeugnisse erstaunen, haben Sie wahrscheinlich ein wunderbare Arbeitsstelle bekommen.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Related Certifications: | CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) CND (Certified Network Defender) CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
Seit der Gründung der ITZert wird unser System immer verbessert ---- Immer reichlicher Test-Bank, gesicherter Zahlungsgarantie und besserer Kundendienst. Heute sind die ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsunterlagen schon von zahlreichen Kunden anerkennt worden. Nach Ihrem Kauf hört unser Kundendienst nicht aus. Wir werden Ihnen die Informationen über die Aktualisierungssituation der ECCouncil 312-97 rechtzeitig. Wir sind auch verantwortlich für Ihre Verlust. Falls Sie nicht wunschgemäß die ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfung bestehen, geben wir alle Ihre für ECCouncil 312-97 bezahlte Gebühren zurück.
| Thema | Einzelheiten |
|---|---|
| Thema 1 |
|
| Thema 2 |
|
| Thema 3 |
|
| Thema 4 |
|
10. Frage
Frances Fisher joined TerraWolt Pvt. Ltd. as a DevSecOps engineer in 2020. On February 1,
2022, his organization became a victim of cyber security attack. The attacker targeted the network and application vulnerabilities and compromised some important functionality of the application. To secure the organization against similar types of attacks, Franches used a flexible, accurate, low maintenance vulnerability management and assessment solution that continuously scans the network and application vulnerabilities and provides daily updates and specialized testing methodologies to catch maximum detectable vulnerabilities. Based on the above- mentioned information, which of the following tools is Frances using?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
BeSECURE is a vulnerability management and assessment solution designed for continuous scanning of both network and application vulnerabilities. It emphasizes flexibility, accuracy, low maintenance overhead, and frequent updates to vulnerability detection mechanisms. These characteristics align directly with the scenario described, where the organization requires continuous scanning, daily updates, and specialized testing methodologies to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. SonarQube focuses on static code quality and security analysis during development, Black Duck is primarily used for open-source software composition analysis, and Shadow Daemon is a web application firewall rather than a comprehensive vulnerability management solution. Using BeSECURE during the Operate and Monitor stage allows organizations to maintain ongoing visibility into their security posture, detect new vulnerabilities as they emerge, and reduce the likelihood of repeat attacks by addressing weaknesses proactively.
11. Frage
Steven Gerrard has been working as a DevSecOps engineer at an IT company that develops software products and applications related to the healthcare industry. His organization has been using Azure DevOps services to securely and quickly develop software products. To ensure that the deployed infrastructure is in accordance with the architecture and industrial standards and the security policies are appropriately implemented, she would like to integrate InSpec with Azure.
Therefore, after installation and configuration of InSpec, she created InSpec profile file and upgraded it with personal metadata and Azure resource pack information; then she wrote the InSpec tests. Which of the following commands should Steven use to run InSpec tests to check the compliance of Azure infrastructure?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Chef InSpec executes compliance tests using the inspec exec command. When testing Azure infrastructure, InSpec requires a target specification using the -t flag with the Azure transport identifier azure://. The correct command is inspec exec inspec-tests/integration/ -t azure://.
Options using exe instead of exec are invalid due to incorrect command spelling. Options that use the -it flag misuse command-line parameters that are not intended for target selection. Running InSpec tests in this way allows DevSecOps teams to validate that Azure resources comply with architectural, security, and regulatory requirements. Integrating these checks into the Build and Test stage ensures continuous compliance and reduces the risk of insecure infrastructure reaching production environments.
12. Frage
(Allen Smith has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer for the past 4 years in an IT company that develops software products and applications for retail companies. To detect common security issues in the source code, he would like to integrate Bandit SAST tool with Jenkins. Allen installed Bandit and created a Jenkins job. In the Source Code Management section, he provided repository URL, credentials, and the branch that he wants to analyze. As Bandit is installed on Jenkins' server, he selected Execute shell for the Build step and configure Bandit script. After successfully integrating Bandit SAST tool with Jenkins, in which of the following can Allen detect security issues?.)
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Bandit is a Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool developed specifically for analyzingPython source code. It scans Python scripts and applications to identify common security issues such as use of weak cryptography, hardcoded passwords, unsafe use of functions like eval, and insecure imports. Bandit works by parsing Python Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) and applying a set of security-focused rules. It does not support Java, Ruby, or C++ code, which require different static analysis tools tailored to their respective languages.
By integrating Bandit with Jenkins during the Build and Test stage, Allen enables automated detection of Python-specific security flaws as soon as code changes are introduced. This shift-left approach reduces remediation costs, prevents vulnerable code from progressing further in the pipeline, and improves overall application security posture.
========
13. Frage
Hassan Al-Rashid, a build engineer at a Dubai fintech, wants to ensure that build artifacts cannot be tampered with between the CI pipeline and the artifact repository, and that consumers can cryptographically verify an artifact's origin and build process. Which framework/practice should Hassan adopt?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
SLSA is a security framework specifically designed to protect the software supply chain by defining a set of increasing levels of build integrity requirements, including provenance generation, tamper-resistant build pipelines, and cryptographic attestations that let consumers verify how, where, and from what source an artifact was built. This directly addresses Hassan's need for tamper-evidence and origin verification between CI and the artifact repository. The OWASP Top 10 catalogs common web application vulnerability categories but does not define supply-chain build integrity controls. CIS Benchmarks provide configuration hardening guidance for operating systems and platforms, not build provenance. MITRE ATT&CK is a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques used for threat intelligence and detection engineering, not artifact integrity. Because Hassan specifically needs tamper resistance and provenance verification for build artifacts, SLSA is correct.
14. Frage
Amy Ryan is a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and web applications related to cyber security. She is using Anchore tool for container vulnerability scanning and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) generation. It helped her to perform quick scanning and generating a list of known vulnerabilities from an SBOM, container image, or project directory. Which of the following commands should Amy run to include software from all the image layers in the SBOM?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Syft is used by Anchore to generate Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) from container images and directories. By default, Syft may only analyze the squashed image view. Using the --scope all-layers flag instructs Syft to include software components from all image layers, ensuring comprehensive visibility into dependencies introduced at every stage of image creation. The other options use invalid syntax or unsupported flags. Including all layers during SBOM generation improves vulnerability detection accuracy and supports compliance requirements, making it a critical practice during the Build and Test stage.
15. Frage
......
312-97 Echte Fragen: https://www.itzert.com/312-97_valid-braindumps.html
P.S. Kostenlose und neue 312-97 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von ITZert verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zC4BWxj3uVLtGvPqJM2f3Vzpvz3lAq_M