P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BraindumpsIT: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SNSb9AeRONfXVNBUqriJaB3E-NcuvNFM
The clients can download our products and use our Plat-Admn-202 study materials immediately after they pay successfully. Our system will send our Plat-Admn-202 learning prep in the form of mails to the client in 5-10 minutes after their successful payment. The mails provide the links and if only the clients click on the links they can log in our software immediately to learn our Plat-Admn-202 Guide materials. As long as the clients buy our Plat-Admn-202 training quiz they can immediately use our product and save their time.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder Exam |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Admn-202 |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Available Languages: | Portuguese, Italian, German, Spanish, English, Japanese, French |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice, Multiple-select, Scenario-based |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Administrator |
| Passing Score: | 63% |
| Exam Price: | USD 200 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 1 year (renewal required annually) |
| Recommended Training: | Trailhead: Prepare for Your Platform App Builder Certification CRT403: Platform App Builder Certification Prep |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Webassessor |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites; recommended to have Salesforce Certified Administrator or 6+ months hands-on experience |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/platform-app-builder |
>> New Plat-Admn-202 Exam Name <<
Windows computers support the desktop-based Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 exam simulation software. These tests create scenarios that are similar to the actual Plat-Admn-202 examination. By sitting in these environments, you will be able to cope with exam anxiety. As a result, you will appear in the Plat-Admn-202 final test confidently.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 50
Cloud Kicks (CK) has a formula field `specialty ` or Opportunity that gets its value from the `specialty ` field on the related Account. CK has changed its processes to allow opportunities to have different values for `Specialty ` than their Account. How can sales reps enter values for the `specialty ` field on Opportunity, while preserving the values on existing opportunities?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Create a new text field and import the formula field values in it.
The existing Specialty__c field is a formula field, so users cannot manually edit it. Formula fields calculate their value automatically from other fields. Since Cloud Kicks now wants Opportunity Specialty__c values to be different from the related Account value, the app builder should create a new editable field, such as a Text field, and then load the existing calculated formula values into that new field for existing Opportunity records.
This preserves historical Opportunity values while allowing sales reps to enter or update Specialty values going forward. Salesforce documentation explains that roll-up/formula-style calculated values are system-derived, while changing custom field types has limitations and requires care when data must be preserved.
A and B are incorrect because a formula field cannot simply become an editable text field while safely preserving all existing calculated values.
C is incomplete because creating a new text field without importing the existing formula values does not preserve the current values on existing Opportunities.
NEW QUESTION # 51
An app builder wants to create a formula field on an Account to include data from related Contacts but is unable to find the relationship in the formula editor.
What is a limitation of formulas that could be causing the issue?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The app builder wants to create a formula field on an Account to include data from related Contacts but cannot find the relationship in the formula editor. This limitation occurs because formula fields in Salesforce cannot reference child records directly.
Option A (Unable to reference the child records): In Salesforce, formula fields can reference parent objects but not child objects. In this case, Contacts are child records of Accounts in a lookup relationship, and Account is the parent. This is why the formula editor does not provide access to the child records (Contacts) from the Account.
Formula Field Considerations
Option B (A master-detail relationship should be created): While master-detail relationships allow for roll-up summaries, creating a master-detail relationship is not applicable here since the standard Account-Contact relationship is a lookup, and changing it to master-detail is not possible.
Option C (Formula field limit reached on the Account object): This would limit the number of formulas but is not the root cause of the issue described.
Option D (More than 5,000 characters in the formula): This limit refers to formula field complexity, but it does not explain the inability to reference child records.
In summary, the limitation is due to Salesforce not allowing formula fields to reference child records.
NEW QUESTION # 52
When a sales rep submits an account for approval, Universal Containers Wants the user to answer additional questions via a popup window to populate Additional record fields. What should an app builder use to achieve the desired result?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Screen Flow is the best declarative tool when the user must answer questions through a guided UI and use those answers to update record fields. Salesforce documents that screen flows provide a UI that guides users through a business process, and they can be launched from quick actions or Lightning pages.
A custom button or action can launch the flow, collect the extra approval-related information, update the Account fields, and then continue the approval submission logic.
Why not others:
A . Custom object only stores data; it does not provide the popup/question flow.
B . Visualforce could be custom-coded, but Flow is the declarative App Builder solution.
D . Custom Lightning component requires development and is not the best declarative answer.
NEW QUESTION # 53
A sales manager at Cloud Kicks wants the team to spend more time in the field and less time manually entering the information found on the business cards they collect. What should an app builder do to help achieve this goal without sacrificing data quality?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Research and evaluate data enrichment products on the AppExchange to automate data entry.
The sales manager wants reps to spend less time manually entering business-card information while maintaining data quality. Salesforce AppExchange is the correct place to evaluate packaged solutions that extend Salesforce functionality. Trailhead describes AppExchange as a place to find solutions for business needs, and AppExchange contains business-card scanning apps that can create or match Salesforce Leads, Contacts, and Accounts with reduced manual entry.
A does not automate data entry.
B is not the best fit because Flow cannot read business cards by itself.
D is incorrect because formula fields calculate values from existing data; they do not capture business-card information.
NEW QUESTION # 54
Universal Containers (UC) has several picklist fields on the Account object Whose values are routinely modified to meet changing business requirements. Due to These revolving changes, UC has a high number of inactive picklist values that are Impacting system performance and user experience. What can the app builder do to alleviate this issue?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A because Salesforce provides the Establish upper bound on existing picklists option to protect picklist performance by limiting inactive picklist values. Salesforce documentation states that this setting runs a query to identify picklists with fewer than 4,000 inactive values and enforce the limit.
Why others are incorrect:
B is for reusing picklist values across fields, not reducing inactive picklist performance impact.
C would worsen the issue because it removes limits on inactive values.
D is too drastic and not the recommended Salesforce feature for this issue.
NEW QUESTION # 55
......
Test Plat-Admn-202 Simulator Online: https://www.braindumpsit.com/Plat-Admn-202_real-exam.html
2026 Latest BraindumpsIT Plat-Admn-202 PDF Dumps and Plat-Admn-202 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SNSb9AeRONfXVNBUqriJaB3E-NcuvNFM