BONUS!!! Download part of Prep4sures SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZL86TqbOcp1udIrSqaYIjBKzSPvrJgIz
Owing to the industrious dedication of our experts and other working staff, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study materials grow to be more mature and are able to fight against any difficulties. Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization preparation exam have achieved high pass rate in the industry, and we always maintain a 99% pass rate with our endless efforts. We have to admit that behind such a starling figure, there embrace mass investments from our company on our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning quiz. But it is all worth that as the high pass rate can make sure our customers pass the exam by the best percentage.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Capacity optimization strategies - Interference analysis and mitigation - Load balancing techniques - Coverage optimization methods - Handover optimization - Parameter tuning best practices |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Root cause analysis methodologies - Common performance issues diagnosis - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Optimization case studies - Network failure identification and resolution |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - Single RAN integration principles - SRAN solution components and functions - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN network architecture overview |
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Automated optimization features - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - Performance data collection and analysis - Threshold configuration and alerting - KPI definition and measurement |
>> Certification SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Answers <<
Do you have the plan to accept this challenge? Looking for a proven and quick method to pass this challenge Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam? If your answer is yes then you do not need to go anywhere. Just visit the Prep4sures and explore the top features of valid, updated, and real Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Dumps.
NEW QUESTION # 24
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
NEW QUESTION # 25
In NR SA Option 2, the UE is camped on an SA serving cell. An IRAT handover is triggered for a multi-QCI call, QCI 1 and QCI 6, due to weak coverage of the serving cell. What will happen to both QCIs during the IRAT handover toward LTE?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is D.
In 5G SA Option 2, NR works independently with the 5G Core, but interworking with LTE/EPC can be supported for mobility continuity. When IRAT handover toward LTE is triggered due to weak NR coverage, the goal is to preserve the active services during mobility.
For a multi-QCI service:
QCI 1 normally represents the voice bearer, such as VoLTE/IMS voice continuity after movement to LTE.
QCI 6 normally represents a non-GBR data bearer.
During a supported IRAT handover from NR SA to LTE, both the voice bearer and data bearer can be transferred to LTE, assuming proper interworking, bearer mapping, and LTE coverage availability.
Option C is incorrect because IRAT mobility from NR SA to LTE is supported in properly configured networks. Option A is incorrect because the voice bearer is the most critical bearer to preserve. Option B is also not the best answer because the data bearer does not necessarily need to be released during IRAT handover.
Therefore, the expected result is:
Both QCI 1 voice and QCI 6 data continue on LTE.
NEW QUESTION # 26
A customer complains about coverage reduction after modernization of 4G TDD 4x4 sites to Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 with AEHC module 64T64R . Which of the following statements regarding RF design changes to increase the coverage is correct?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In a Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 AEHC 64T64R deployment, LTE and NR share the same Massive MIMO active antenna system. Public Nokia material identifies AEHC as an AirScale Massive MIMO
64T64R B41 radio product, and Nokia's AirScale Massive MIMO portfolio is designed for high-capacity 5G
/RAN deployments.
Unlike a passive antenna system where coverage is changed mainly by physical/electrical RET, Massive MIMO coverage is strongly influenced by beamforming profiles and beamforming weight parameters . In concurrent LTE/NR operation, the RF design must consider the shared active antenna behavior, not independent passive RET-style tilt control per technology.
Therefore, for concurrent 4G/5G mMIMO coverage adjustment, the correct statement is:
The tilt/coverage behavior for both 4G and 5G is controlled by mMIMOSecSectorBFProfName and beamforming weight profile parameters.
NEW QUESTION # 27
What is the role of admission control in 5G networks ?
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 28
Evaluate the impact of extended FR2 cell range on power consumption.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In FR2/mmWave , uplink coverage is often the limiting factor because UE transmit power is much lower than gNodeB transmit power, and mmWave propagation suffers from high path loss and blockage. Ericsson's mmWave coverage discussion also notes that high-band coverage is limited by uplink signal quality and high- band propagation characteristics.
When the FR2 cell range is extended, UEs farther from the serving cell must transmit uplink signals over a more difficult radio path. This usually requires higher UE transmit power, more robust MCS, more repetitions or retransmissions, and potentially longer uplink activity. As a result, UE battery consumption can increase.
Therefore, extended FR2 range generally:
Increases power consumption because UEs need more energy to transmit uplink signals.
NEW QUESTION # 29
......
"Prep4sures" created a demo version for customer satisfaction so candidates can evaluate the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions before purchasing. Also, "Prep4sures" has made this Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice exam material budget-friendly with many benefits that make it the best choice. Our team of experts who designed this SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions assures that whoever prepares with it adequately, there is no doubt of failure and they will pass the Nokia CERTIFICATION EXAM on the first attempt. Purchase our "Prep4sures" study material now and get free updates for up to 1 year.
Latest SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions Vce: https://www.prep4sures.top/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-exam-dumps-torrent.html
P.S. Free 2026 Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4sures: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZL86TqbOcp1udIrSqaYIjBKzSPvrJgIz