BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Real4dumps SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15raLVp05OZCNeSM94Ls2A37GVzpfBwvD
Our users are all over the world, and our privacy protection system on the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study guide is also the world leader. Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam preparation will protect the interests of every user. Now that the network is so developed, we can disclose our information at any time. You must recognize the seriousness of leaking privacy. For security, you really need to choose an authoritative product like our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning braindumps.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN solution components and functions - SRAN network architecture overview - Single RAN integration principles - Radio access concepts and principles |
| Topic 2: Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Parameter tuning best practices - Load balancing techniques - Capacity optimization strategies - Handover optimization - Coverage optimization methods - Interference analysis and mitigation |
| Topic 3: SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Automated optimization features - Nokia NetAct and performance tools - Report generation and interpretation - Configuration management for optimization |
| Topic 4: Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Performance data collection and analysis - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Threshold configuration and alerting - KPI definition and measurement |
| Topic 5: Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Common performance issues diagnosis - Optimization case studies - Network failure identification and resolution - Root cause analysis methodologies |
>> SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Reliable Test Labs <<
A Real4dumps support team is on hand to help SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam applicants use the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice tests and address any problems. The goal is to help candidates crack the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam in one go. Free Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization demo and up to 1 year of free Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Questions are also available at Real4dumps. So, start preparation with real MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) questions right away if you wish to pass the test while saving time and money.
NEW QUESTION # 18
Evaluate the impact of extended FR2 cell range on power consumption.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In FR2/mmWave , uplink coverage is often the limiting factor because UE transmit power is much lower than gNodeB transmit power, and mmWave propagation suffers from high path loss and blockage. Ericsson's mmWave coverage discussion also notes that high-band coverage is limited by uplink signal quality and high- band propagation characteristics.
When the FR2 cell range is extended, UEs farther from the serving cell must transmit uplink signals over a more difficult radio path. This usually requires higher UE transmit power, more robust MCS, more repetitions or retransmissions, and potentially longer uplink activity. As a result, UE battery consumption can increase.
Therefore, extended FR2 range generally:
Increases power consumption because UEs need more energy to transmit uplink signals.
NEW QUESTION # 19
Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information , or S-NSSAI , identifies a network slice. Which of the following statements are correct regarding NSSAI ? Refer to the diagram for basic information.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D: A, B, C, and D .
In 5G network slicing, S-NSSAI identifies a single network slice. It is composed of:
SST , or Slice/Service Type
SD , or Slice Differentiator
Statement A is correct.
The combination of SST + SD can uniquely identify a slice. For example, two slices may both use SST 1 for eMBB/MBB-type service, but different SD values can separate them for different enterprises, tenants, or service groups.
Statement B is correct.
SST is mandatory. It is an 8-bit numeric field that indicates the expected slice/service behavior, such as eMBB, URLLC, or mMTC.
Statement C is correct.
SD is optional. It is a 24-bit field used to differentiate multiple slices that may share the same SST.
Statement D is correct.
SST may use standardized values, such as SST 1 for eMBB, SST 2 for URLLC, and SST 3 for mMTC/MIoT.
It may also use operator-specific or non-standardized values depending on deployment requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 20
Which of the following statements about CBRA , or contention-based random access , is correct?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In contention-based random access , the UE chooses a random access preamble by itself from a configured pool of available contention-based preambles. This is typically used when the UE does not yet have a dedicated connection or when the network has not assigned a dedicated preamble.
Because multiple UEs may choose the same preamble at the same time, preamble collision is possible . That is why CBRA requires a contention resolution step.
Option C describes contention-free random access , not CBRA. In contention-free random access, the network assigns a dedicated preamble to the UE, so collision risk is avoided and contention resolution is not required.
Option A is not the correct CBRA principle being tested. RACH false detection can be a receiver/design issue, but it does not define the CBRA procedure.
Option D describes a possible NSA signaling behavior around access failure handling, but it is not the core correct definition of CBRA.
Therefore, the correct CBRA statement is:
The UE autonomously selects a preamble from the configured range and starts the random access procedure.
NEW QUESTION # 21
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
NEW QUESTION # 22
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
NEW QUESTION # 23
......
The MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) practice questions (desktop and web-based) are customizable, meaning users can set the questions and time according to their needs to improve their discipline and feel the real-based exam scenario to pass the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Certification. Customizable mock tests comprehensively and accurately represent the actual Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification exam scenario.
Reliable SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Tips: https://www.real4dumps.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization_examcollection.html
P.S. Free & New SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Real4dumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15raLVp05OZCNeSM94Ls2A37GVzpfBwvD