BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Exam4PDF SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qepF8WBxyXJYS9AZ-FArVgsn_G-19h7a
Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice materials are suitable to exam candidates of different levels. And after using our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning prep, they all have marked change in personal capacity to deal with the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam intellectually. The world is full of chicanery, but we are honest and professional in this area over ten years. Even if you are newbie, it does not matter as well. To pass the exam in limited time, you will find it as a piece of cake with the help of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study engine!
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Root cause analysis methodologies - Optimization case studies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Network failure identification and resolution - Common performance issues diagnosis |
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Automated optimization features - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - Single RAN integration principles - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN solution components and functions - SRAN network architecture overview |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - Threshold configuration and alerting - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Performance data collection and analysis - KPI definition and measurement |
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Capacity optimization strategies - Handover optimization - Load balancing techniques - Interference analysis and mitigation - Parameter tuning best practices - Coverage optimization methods |
>> Latest SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Prep <<
For complete, comprehensive, and instant MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam preparation, the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions are the right choice. Exam4PDF offers reliable new exam format，exam dumps demo and valid exam online help customers pass the MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization easily.
NEW QUESTION # 11
The CB009425 feature provides several enhancements to improve the transmission link budget for VoNR, offering a better customer experience. Which statements are correct regarding this feature?
Answer: E
Explanation:
The correct answer is D.
The feature is focused on improving VoNR link robustness and user experience, especially near the cell edge or in difficult RF conditions. VoNR is sensitive to packet loss, delay, and uplink coverage limitations.
Therefore, link-budget improvement features commonly target BLER behavior, transport block sizing, and MCS robustness.
Statement A is correct because minimizing Packet Loss Rate, or PLR, directly improves VoNR speech quality and reduces mute, clipping, or robotic voice effects.
Statement B is correct because VoNR bearers can use specific initial BLER targets. A more suitable BLER target helps the scheduler choose a more robust MCS for voice traffic.
Statement C is correct because a configurable uplink minimum TBS, or Transport Block Size, helps ensure that small VoNR packets are transmitted efficiently and reliably.
Statement D is correct because MCS downgrade control can improve robustness by selecting a more conservative modulation and coding scheme for VoNR DRBs when radio conditions require it.
Therefore, all listed enhancements are part of the VoNR link-budget improvement concept:
A, B, C, and D.
NEW QUESTION # 12
What is the role of admission control in 5G networks ?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is D .
Admission control is responsible for deciding whether a new UE connection, bearer, service, or session can be accepted by the cell without negatively affecting existing users and services.
In 5G RAN, admission control checks available radio resources such as:
* PRB availability
* PDCCH/PUCCH capacity
* UE context capacity
* QoS requirements
* GBR or non-GBR bearer requirements
* Cell load and congestion status
It does not directly manage modulation schemes; that is handled by link adaptation. It also does not directly increase spectral efficiency or optimize downlink throughput, although good admission control indirectly protects user experience and avoids overload.
So the main role of admission control is:
To check whether there are enough resources for new connections.
NEW QUESTION # 13
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.
NEW QUESTION # 14
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
NEW QUESTION # 15
In a 5G NSA Option 3x deployment, why should we not define 5G neighbors in LTE sectors where there is no 5G coverage ?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is A .
In 5G NSA Option 3x , LTE acts as the Master Cell Group , and NR acts as the Secondary Cell Group , usually added through EN-DC . If 5G NR neighbors are configured in an LTE sector where there is actually no 5G coverage , the LTE eNB may still configure the UE to perform NR measurements.
To perform NR inter-RAT or inter-frequency measurements, the UE may require measurement gaps .
During these gaps, the UE stops normal LTE reception/transmission activities to measure NR frequencies. If there is no real 5G coverage, those gaps become wasted measurement time and can reduce LTE user throughput.
Option B is not the best answer because if there is no 5G coverage, the main issue is not successful SCG addition or handover degradation, but unnecessary measurement activity. Option C is also not correct because redirection from 5G to 4G normally occurs when the UE is already on or connected to 5G coverage, which is not the case here.
Therefore, the main reason is:
LTE throughput degradation due to unnecessary measurement gap configuration.
NEW QUESTION # 16
......
Exam4PDF is a leading platform that is committed to preparing the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification exam candidates in a short time period. These Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam dumps are designed and verified by experienced and certified exam trainers. They put all their efforts to maintain the top standard of Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions all the time. latest real exam and exam questions offerred by Exam4PDF, with free updates for 365 days.
Brain Dump SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Free: https://www.exam4pdf.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-dumps-torrent.html
BONUS!!! Download part of Exam4PDF SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qepF8WBxyXJYS9AZ-FArVgsn_G-19h7a