ちなみに、PassTest NPPEの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o2GuE0wGWqzYNKuzJxYpr3FQ2gh_rMqe
最初の試行でPassTest最短時間でNPPE認定を取得したい場合、効果的で便利なNPPE質問バンクほど刺激的なものはありません。 NPPEトレーニング資料を早くAPEGS使用するほど、NPPE試験に合格する可能性が高くなり、NPPE証明書を早く取得できます。 私たちのNPPE試験問題を必ず試してみる必要があります。間違いなく満足するでしょう。 それに加えて、有効かつ正確なNPPE学習教材だけでなく、National Professional Practice Examination (NPPE) Exam優れたサービスも世界中のお客様から高く評価されています。
| Certification Vendor: | APEGS (Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan) |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | National Professional Practice Examination |
| Exam Number: | NPPE |
| Real Exam Qty: | 110 (100 scored, 10 experimental) |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Related Certifications: | Geoscientist-in-Training Engineer-in-Training |
| Passing Score: | Scaled score 65 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Valid indefinitely once passed |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice questions, Computer-based, Closed-book |
| Exam Price: | CAD 264.50 (including tax, subject to change) |
| Available Languages: | French, English |
| Recommended Training: | NPPE Official Blueprint & Study Resources |
| Exam Registration: | APEGS Registration Meazure Learning Exam Booking |
| Sample Questions: | APEGS NPPE Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based, remote proctored or in-person testing centre |
| Pre Condition: | Must be registered as Engineer-in-Training, Geoscientist-in-Training, Licensee, or eligible applicant with APEGS or Canadian regulatory body |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.apegs.ca/apply/how-to-apply/professional-practice-exam |
APEGSのNPPEの認定試験の受験生は試験に合格することが難しいというのをよく知っています。しかし、試験に合格することが成功への唯一の道ですから、試験を受けることを選ばなければなりません。職業価値を高めるために、あなたは認定試験に合格する必要があります。PassTestが開発された試験の問題と解答は異なるターゲットに含まれていますし、カバー率が高いですから、それを超える書籍や資料が絶対ありません。大勢の人たちの利用結果によると、PassTestの合格率は１００パーセントに達したのですから、絶対あなたが試験を受かることに重要な助けになれます。PassTestは唯一のあなたの向いている試験に合格する方法で、PassTestを選んだら、美しい未来を選んだということになります。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
質問 # 91
After promoting their lift station design services to prospective clients, a new engineering Arm was hired by a local municipality to design and build a highly technical control system. ~me system required specialized electrical wiring and sot up, along with detailed programming.
The licensed professionals at the firm had newer dealt with such a complicated control system or set-up, but not wanting to lose their new client, proceeded with the design and set up without competent knowledge.
Delays on the project occurred due to the lack of satisfactory drawings and programming code. When the system was delivered and set up onsite. It failed to work properly despite various time-consuming adjustments. These delays led the firm to Dill the client for cost over-runs. In retrospect, what should the firm have done?
正解：B
解説：
The firm should have accepted only work for which they were competent to perform. Since the project involving a highly technical control system was beyond their existing capabilities, they should not have accepted it (Option A). This action aligns with professional ethics that emphasize competence, as professionals are obligated to undertake only tasks for which they are qualified, ensuring safety, efficacy, and client satisfaction. By undertaking work beyond their competence, the firm risked project success, client trust, and professional reputation.
質問 # 92
Two patties have discussed the feasibility of executing a highway project, and a study has proven that It will be profitable and beneficial to the public. A contract has been entered into between the two parties for execution of the work. A disagreement emerges at this point/ with no sign of resolution In sight. One party suggests arbitration as a way to resolve the Issue. However, the second party rejects t on the basis that arbitration is not addressed in the contract and therefore cannot be used as a resolution tool.
Which of the following statements explains whether the second party is correct?
正解：A
解説：
The second party is incorrect to reject arbitration simply because it is not addressed in the contract (Option C).
Arbitration can still be sought if both parties agree to it, even in the absence of a pre-existing mandatory arbitration clause in the contract. Arbitration is a common form of alternative dispute resolution that can be agreed upon by parties at any time if both find it mutually beneficial, thereby avoiding more costly and time- consuming litigation.
質問 # 93
A tort is:
正解：C
解説：
A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, that causes harm and gives rise to legal liability. In professional practice, the most commonly tested tort is negligence: failing to meet the required standard of care and thereby causing reasonably foreseeable harm. This is fundamentally non-contractual-someone may owe a duty of care even without a contract, and liability can extend to third parties affected by the professional's work. Option C correctly describes tort as a non-contractual breach of a duty of care. Option A describes negligent performance in a contractual context, which can ground a breach of contract claim, but that is not the definition of tort itself. Option B is incorrect because tort law is primarily judge-made (common law) rather than purely statutory (though statutes can modify or create specific civil causes of action). Option D is incorrect because professional liability insurance commonly covers certain tort claims (especially negligence), subject to policy terms and exclusions. Therefore, C is correct.
質問 # 94
A licensed professional. Contractor A, Pas a long history with licensed professional Contractor 8. They studied at the same university, worked closely together in the past, and regularly compete for projects.
Recently, Contractor A has come upon clear and compelling evidence that Contractor B lacks technical competence and has been professionally negligent.
Which of the following actions Is in accordance with the professional code of ethics?
正解：A
解説：
The appropriate action according to the professional code of ethics would be for Contractor A to document the evidence of Contractor B's professional misconduct and report their findings to the profession's investigative committee (Option B). This approach adheres to the ethical guidelines of addressing professional negligence and incompetence through formal channels rather than through personal interventions or public disclosure, which could undermine professional integrity and confidentiality.
質問 # 95
Before approving work done by others not under his or her direct supervision, a professional member must:
正解：C
解説：
Approving (or sealing) work means accepting professional responsibility for it. NPPE practice guidance stresses that a professional must not rely blindly on work prepared by others outside their direct supervision.
To accept responsibility, the professional must perform a level of review and verification sufficient to be confident the work meets the applicable standard of care, is fit for purpose, and complies with relevant codes and requirements. This requires a thorough review (C), which may include checking key assumptions, inputs, methods, calculations, and outputs, and obtaining clarification or additional information where needed. It does not necessarily require redoing every calculation (B) in full, but the review must be substantive. Interviewing everyone involved (A) is not required and is not a substitute for technical verification. A cursory review (D) is inadequate to support responsible approval. Therefore, C is correct.
質問 # 96
......
NPPE赤本合格率: https://www.passtest.jp/APEGS/NPPE-shiken.html
2026年PassTestの最新NPPE PDFダンプおよびNPPE試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o2GuE0wGWqzYNKuzJxYpr3FQ2gh_rMqe