DOWNLOAD the newest TrainingDumps Plat-Arch-204 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DS8FYimEUoIafKvbWy-02KJOeiuYCzRP
By contrasting with other products in the industry, our Plat-Arch-204 test guide really has a higher pass rate, which has been verified by many users. As long as you use our Plat-Arch-204 exam training I believe you can pass the exam. If you fail to pass the exam, we will give a full refund. Plat-Arch-204 learning guide hopes to progress together with you and work together for their own future. The high passing rate of Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect exam training guide also requires your efforts. If you choose Plat-Arch-204 test guide, I believe we can together contribute to this high pass rate.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice, Multiple-select |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce System Architect Salesforce B2C Solution Architect |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
>> Examinations Plat-Arch-204 Actual Questions <<
TrainingDumps exam material is best suited to busy specialized who can now learn in their seemly timings. The Plat-Arch-204 Exam dumps have been gratified in the PDF format which can certainly be retrieved on all the digital devices, including; Smartphone, Laptop, and Tablets. There will be no additional installation required for Plat-Arch-204 certification exam preparation material. Also, this PDF can also be got printed. And all the information you will seize from Plat-Arch-204 Exam PDF can be verified on the Practice software, which has numerous self-learning and self-assessment features to test their learning. Our software exam offers you statistical reports which will upkeep the students to find their weak areas and work on them.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 114
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs, but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public website forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In an org merger scenario, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must often design interim solutions that balance speed of delivery with minimal development overhead. The requirement here is for leads to be synced within a 30-minute window. This is a relatively low-latency requirement that does not strictly necessitate a real-time, event-driven architecture, which typically requires more complex infrastructure like Platform Events or middleware.
Option A, calling the Salesforce REST API to insert leads into the target system, represents the standard, most straightforward approach. Since both systems are Salesforce orgs, the retiring org can be configured to make an outbound REST call to the new org's standard Lead endpoint. This can be achieved with a small amount of Apex code (such as a trigger or an invocable method called by a Flow). This approach is considered the "least development effort" because it leverages the standard REST API, which is already enabled and authenticated via a Connected App in the target org. It requires no custom API development in the target system and uses standard JSON payloads.
Option B is incorrect because the Tooling API is intended for managing metadata, system settings, and developer tools, not for standard transactional data movement like Lead insertion. Option C, using the Composite REST API, is an optimization technique designed to group multiple requests into a single call to save on API limits. While efficient for high-volume scenarios, it introduces additional development complexity regarding payload construction and bulk error handling that exceeds the "least effort" requirement for a simple Lead sync. Therefore, a standard REST call is the most direct path to meeting the 30-minute SLA with minimal coding.
NEW QUESTION # 115
A customer imports data from an external system into Salesforce using Bulk API. These jobs have batch sizes of 2,000 and are run in parallel mode. The batches fail frequently with the error "Max CPU time exceeded". A smaller batch size will fix this error. What should be considered when using a smaller batch size?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Bulk API is designed to process massive datasets by breaking them into smaller batches that Salesforce processes asynchronously. When a batch fails with the "Max CPU time exceeded" error, it typically indicates that the complexity of the operations triggered by the record-such as Apex triggers, Flows, or complex sharing calculations-exceeds the 10,000ms limit within a single transaction.
Reducing the batch size is the standard architectural remedy because it reduces the number of records processed in a single transaction, thereby lowering the total CPU time consumed by those records. However, the architect must consider the impact on the overall throughput and execution time.
When batch sizes are smaller, the total number of batches required to process the same dataset increases. For instance, moving from a batch size of 2,000 to 200 for a 1-million-record dataset increases the number of batches from 500 to 5,000. Each batch carries its own overhead for initialization and finalization within the Salesforce platform. Consequently, while the individual batches are more likely to succeed, the total time required to complete the entire job will increase.
The architect should also be aware of the daily limit on the total number of batches allowed (typically 15,000 in a 24-hour period). While Option C mentions API request limits, the Bulk API is governed more strictly by its own batch limits. Option B is less likely because "parallel mode" naturally manages concurrency. Thus, the primary trade-off the architect must present to the business is a gain in reliability (successful processing) at the cost of total duration (increased sync time).
NEW QUESTION # 116
The director of customer service at Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to capture and trend specific business events that occur in Salesforce in real time. The metrics will be accessed in an ad-hoc manner using an external analytics system. The events include product exchanges, authorization clicks, subscription cancellations, and refund initiations via Cases. Which solution should meet these business requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To meet a requirement for real-time event capture that supports an external analytics system, the arc14hitect must choose a pattern that is scalable, decoupled, and reliable. Platform Events are the modern standard for this use case.
By using a Case Trigger to publish a specific Platform Event, NTO creates a highly decoupled Publish/Subscribe architecture. The external analytics system (or a middleware layer feeding it) acts as a subscriber to the event channel. This is superior to standard callouts or outbound messaging for several reasons:
Durability: Platform Events offer a 72-hour retention window. If the analytics system is momentarily offline, it can use the Replay ID to retrieve missed events.
Atomic Transactions: Triggers can be configured to publish events only after the database transaction successfully commits ("Publish After Commit"), ensuring the analytics system doesn't receive data for transactions that were eventually rolled back.
Event Volume: Platform Events are designed to handle much higher volumes of real-time messages than standard synchronous callouts.
Option A (Apex Callouts) is a point-to-point, synchronous pattern that would block Case processing and risk hitting "Concurrent Long-Running Request" limits. Option B (Outbound Messaging) is reliable but is limited to a single object per message and uses a rigid SOAP format that is less flexible for ad-hoc external analytics than the modern JSON/CometD/gRPC structures used by the event bus. By implementing Option C, the architect ensures that every specific business milestone (refund, exchange, cancellation) is broadcasted immediately, providing the customer service director with the accurate, real-time visibility required for trending and metrics.
NEW QUESTION # 117
A large enterprise customer is implementing Salesforce. Current systems include ERP for invoicing/fulfillment and a Marketing solution for email. Associates need to view and log interactions in Salesforce. Which system should be the system of record for customers and prospects?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To achieve a "Customer 360" view where sales and service associates have the context needed for daily interactions, Salesforce is the logical System of Record (SoR) for customer and prospect engagement.
While the ERP remains the master for financial transactions (invoices) and the Marketing tool masters campaign analytics, Salesforce should house the core "Golden Record" of the customer. This is achieved by integrating relevant data from the ERP (order status, invoice history) and Marketing (lead source, email engagement) into Salesforce. This strategy (Option A) empowers associates to log interactions and view history in one place, fulfilling the primary goal of the CRM implementation while avoiding the complexity of a new custom database (Option B) or trying to force prospect-level engagement data into a rigid ERP (Option C).
NEW QUESTION # 118
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has an affiliate company that would like immediate notifications of changes to opportunities in the NTO Salesforce instance. The affiliate company has a CometD client available.
Which solution is recommended in order to meet the requirement?
Answer: A
Explanation:
To provide "immediate notifications" to a client that already supports CometD, the architect must utilize Salesforce's Streaming API. PushTopic Events are the classic Streaming API implementation for broadcasting changes to specific records.
A PushTopic is a definition that includes a SOQL query and a set of trigger events (Create, Update, Delete). When an Opportunity in NTO's instance is updated and matches the query, Salesforce automatically pushes a notification to the topic's channel. The affiliate's CometD client, having subscribed to this channel, receives the data payload instantly.12 Option A (Polling) is the architectural opposite of "immediate notifications". Polling is inefficient, consumes API limits, and int13roduces latency between the actual record change and the client's discovery of that change. Option C is incorrect as there is no "Accept CometD" setting in a Connected App; while a Connected App is used for OAuth authentication, the PushTopic is the mechanism that actually defines and delivers the stream. By using PushTopic, NTO provides a decoupled, event-driven architecture that fulfills the requirement for real-time visibility while minimizing the technical burden on the affiliate's infrastructure.
NEW QUESTION # 119
......
Plat-Arch-204 Valid Exam Online: https://www.trainingdumps.com/Plat-Arch-204_exam-valid-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingDumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DS8FYimEUoIafKvbWy-02KJOeiuYCzRP