2026 Latest ExamcollectionPass Integration-Architect PDF Dumps and Integration-Architect Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VPL2RYGHFddjFgnkd7rwcWdvlZdu3A7L
The Salesforce Integration-Architect PDF questions file of ExamcollectionPass has real Salesforce Integration-Architect exam questions with accurate answers. You can download Salesforce PDF Questions file and revise Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Integration-Architect exam questions from any place at any time. We also offer desktop Integration-Architect practice exam software which works after installation on Windows computers. The Integration-Architect web-based practice test on the other hand needs no software installation or additional plugins. Chrome, Opera, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari support the web-based Integration-Architect Practice Exam. You can access the Salesforce Integration-Architect web-based practice test via Mac, Linux, iOS, Android, and Windows. ExamcollectionPass Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Integration-Architect practice test (desktop & web-based) allows you to design your mock test sessions. These Salesforce Integration-Architect exam practice tests identify your mistakes and generate your result report on the spot.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Exam |
| Exam Number: | Integration-Architect |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 (approx.) |
| Available Languages: | English, Japanese |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II Salesforce Certified Data Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Maintenance required annually (Salesforce certification maintenance program) |
| Exam Format: | Multiple select, Multiple choice, Scenario-based questions |
| Recommended Training: | Integration Architecture on Trailhead MuleSoft Integration Training |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Portal Webassessor Exam Registration |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Integration-Architect Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended prerequisite: Salesforce Certified Application Architect or equivalent deep Salesforce platform experience |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/architect/integration-architect |
>> New Integration-Architect Exam Camp <<
Now passing Integration-Architect exam is not easy, so choosing a good training tool is a guarantee of success to get the Integration-Architect certificate. If you choose our Integration-Architect exam materials, we will free update within one year after you purchase. That is to say we can ensure that we will provide you with exam information and exam practice questions and answers immediately. It can let you be fully prepared for exam, and almost have 100% pass rate of Integration-Architect Exam. We can not only allow you for the first time to participate in Integration-Architect exam to pass it successfully, but also help you save a lot of valuable. Don't miss such a good opportunity because of your hesitation.
Salesforce Integration-Architect certification is recognized by organizations across the world and is highly valued by employers. Salesforce Certified Integration Architect certification helps professionals to stand out in a crowded job market and opens up new career opportunities. With the growing demand for Salesforce integration, the Salesforce Integration-Architect Certification is becoming increasingly popular among professionals. Salesforce Certified Integration Architect certification validates the candidate's expertise in Salesforce integration and helps them to stay ahead of the competition.
NEW QUESTION # 46
An enterprise customer is planning to implement Salesforce to support case management.
Below is their current system landscape diagram. Considering Salesforce capabilities, what should the integration architect evaluate when integrating Salesforce with the current system landscape?
Answer: C
Explanation:
An Integration Architect's primary responsibility when evaluating a landscape for a new Salesforce implementation is to identify the system of record for each business process and determine which legacy systems will be replaced by Salesforce. In this scenario, the customer is implementing Salesforce specifically to support case management.
According to the provided landscape diagram, the Case Management System currently exists as a standalone entity. Since Salesforce Service Cloud provides native, best-in-class case management capabilities, this legacy system is the primary candidate for retirement. Retiring the legacy Case Management system avoids data fragmentation and ensures that Salesforce serves as the single source of truth for support interactions.
However, for Salesforce to function effectively as a new case management hub, it must integrate with the remaining surrounding systems:
* Email Management System: This system likely handles inbound customer communications. An architect must evaluate integrating this with Salesforce (via Email-to-Case or a specialized connector) so that incoming emails automatically generate or update cases.
* Order Management System (OMS): Support agents often need to view order history or status to resolve customer inquiries. Integrating Salesforce with the OMS allows for a 360-degree view, enabling agents to see relevant order data directly within the Salesforce case console.
* Data Warehouse: For long-term reporting, trend analysis, and a unified customer profile, case data from Salesforce needs to be pushed to the Data Warehouse. This ensures that the Analytics and Business Intelligence Tool downstream can report on support metrics alongside other enterprise data.
Therefore, the architect should evaluate integrations with the Data Warehouse, Order Management, and Email Management System. Option B and C are incorrect because they suggest integrating with the "Case Management System," which is the very system being superseded by Salesforce's native capabilities. By focusing on the integration of these three supporting systems, the architect ensures a seamless transition where Salesforce is fully enriched with the necessary external data to drive support excellence.
NEW QUESTION # 47
A company's security assessment noted vulnerabilities on the un managed packages in their Salesforce orgs, notably secrets that are easily accessible and in plain text, such as usernames, passwords, and OAuth tokens used in callouts from Salesforce.
Which two persistence mechanisms should an integration architect require to be used to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure?
Choose 2 answers
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Explanation
Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings are two persistence mechanisms that can be used to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure. Named Credentials allow you to specify the URL of a callout endpoint and its required authentication parameters in one definition. Salesforce manages all the authentication for Apex callouts that specify a named credential as the callout endpoint, and you don't have to add more authentication logic in your Apex code. Named Credentials can be defined to provide a secure and convenient way of setting up authenticated callouts, and they can also be used in Lightning components, Visualforce pages, and flows1.
Protected Custom Settings are a type of custom settings that store application-specific data that is hidden from subscribers. They are only accessible by the managed package that created them, and they can be used to store secrets such as encryption keys, passwords, or tokens. Protected Custom Settings can be accessed by Apex code, formulas, or validation rules within the same namespace as the settings2.
Encrypted Custom Fields are not a suitable mechanism for storing secrets, because they are not designed to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data. Encrypted Custom Fields allow you to encrypt text fields using a standard encryption scheme. The encrypted data is masked in reports, list views, and search results, but it can still be viewed by users who have the "View Encrypted Data" permission. Encrypted Custom Fields are intended to protect data from unauthorized access by users within your organization, not from external threats or malicious code3.
Protected Custom Metadata Types are another type of custom metadata types that store application-specific data that is hidden from subscribers. They are similar to Protected Custom Settings, but they have some advantages such as being deployable using change sets or Metadata API, being accessible by SOQL queries, and being able to reference other metadata types or settings. However, Protected Custom Metadata Types cannot be used to store secrets, because they do not support encryption or masking of sensitive data. Protected Custom Metadata Types are intended to store configuration data that is specific to your managed package, not secrets that need to be secured.
Therefore, the correct answer is B and D, because Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings are the only persistence mechanisms that can be used to securely store secrets in Salesforce.
References: 1: Named Credentials | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers 2: Custom Settings | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers 3: Encrypted Fields | Salesforce Help : [Protected Custom Metadata Types | ISVforce Guide | Salesforce Developers]
NEW QUESTION # 48
The URL for a business-critical external service providing exchange rates changed without notice. Which solutions should be implemented to minimize potential downtime for users in this situation?
Answer: A
Explanation:
To minimize downtime when an external endpoint changes, an Integration Architect must ensure that the URL is not "hardcoded" within Apex code or configuration. The standard Salesforce mechanism for abstracting and managing external endpoints is Named Credentials.
Named Credentials specify the URL of a callout endpoint and its required authentication parameters in one definition. If the URL changes, an administrator simply updates the "URL" field in the Named Credential setup. This change takes effect immediately across all Apex callouts, Flows, and External Services that reference it, without requiring a code deployment or a sandbox-to-production migration.
Along with Named Credentials, Remote Site Settings (or the more modern External Website Configurations) are required. Salesforce blocks all outbound calls to URLs that are not explicitly whitelisted.
By having both in place, the remediation process is:
* Update the URL in the Named Credential.
* Update (or add) the new URL in the Remote Site Settings.
This approach follows the "Separation of Concerns" principle. Option B (ESB) could technically handle this, but it adds an extra layer of failure and complexity for a simple URL change. Option C (Content Security Policies) is used to control which resources (like scripts or images) a browser is allowed to load in the UI; it does not govern server-side Apex callouts. Therefore, the combination of Named Credentials and Remote Site whitelisting is the most efficient and standard way to provide architectural agility and minimize downtime.
NEW QUESTION # 49
Which Web Services Description Language (WSDL) should an architect consider when creating an integration that might be used for more than one Salesforce org and different metadata?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the world of Salesforce SOAP APIs, the choice of WSDL depends on the nature of the application being built. When an architect needs to build an integration that is org-agnostic-meaning it can work across multiple different Salesforce organizations with varying custom objects and fields-the Partner WSDL is the correct choice.
The Partner WSDL is loosely-typed. It does not contain information about an org's specific custom metadata; instead, it uses a generic sObject structure. This allows a single client application (like a third-party integration tool or a mobile app) to connect to any Salesforce org and dynamically discover its schema at runtime. Because it is not tied to a specific org's metadata, it does not need to be regenerated every time a custom field is added to one of the target orgs.
In contrast, Option A (Enterprise WSDL) is strongly-typed. It is generated specifically for one org and contains hard-coded references to that org's custom objects and fields. While this provides better compile-time safety for internal, single-org integrations, it is unsuitable for an application intended for "more than one Salesforce org" because the WSDL would be invalid for any org that doesn't have the exact same metadata.
Option C is a general term; the actual choices provided by Salesforce for integration are the Partner or Enterprise WSDLs. Therefore, for maximum flexibility and reusability across a multi-org landscape, the Partner WSDL is the industry standard.
NEW QUESTION # 50
An enterprise architect has requested the Salesforce integration architect to review the following (see diagram and description) and provide recommendations after carefully considering all constraints of the enterprise systems and Salesforce Platform limits.
* About 3,000 phone sales agents use a Salesforce Lightning user interface (UI) concurrently to check eligibility of a customer for a qualifying offer.
* There are multiple eligibility systems that provide this service and are hosted externally.
* However, their current response times could take up to 90 seconds to process and return (there are discussions to reduce the response times in the future, but no commitments are made).
* These eligibility systems can be accessed through APIs orchestrated via ESB (MuleSoft).
* All requests from Salesforce will have to traverse through the customer's API Gateway layer, and the API Gateway imposes a constraint of timing out requests after 9 seconds.
Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The primary architectural challenge in this scenario is the massive discrepancy between the backend response time (up to 90 seconds) and the API Gateway timeout constraint (9 seconds). In any synchronous integration pattern, the connection must remain open across the entire path; if the API Gateway closes the connection at 9 seconds, a standard Salesforce "Request-Reply" callout will fail long before the 90-second eligibility check is complete.
Option A is non-viable because synchronous polling at a high scale (3,000 concurrent users) would likely hit Salesforce concurrent request limits and place an immense, unnecessary load on the API Gateway. Option B, using Continuation, is designed to handle long-running callouts (up to 120 seconds) without blocking Salesforce threads, but it still requires the external connection path to remain open. It does not bypass the 9- second timeout imposed by the customer's API Gateway.
The optimal recommendation is Option C, which implements an Asynchronous Request-Reply pattern using Platform Events and the empAPI.12
* Request Phase: The Salesforce UI initiates the request. To bypass the 9-second gateway timeout, the ESB (MuleSoft) should be configured to receive the request3 and immediately return an acknowledgment (e.g.,4 HTTP 202 Accepted). This allows the initial Salesforce callout to complete successfully within the 9-second window.56
* Processing Phase: MuleSoft then proceeds with the long-running (up to 90 seconds) call to the external eligibility systems.78
* Callback Phase (Remote Call-In)9: Once the eligibility result is received, MuleSoft calls back into Salesforce via the REST API to publish a Platform Event containing the result.10
* UI Update (empA11PI): The 3,000 sales agents' browsers, having subscribed to the event channel using the empAPI (Lightning's built-in library for streaming events), receive the notification in real- time. The UI then updates to display the "Display Response" step.
This event-driven architecture effectively "insulates" Salesforce and the API Gateway from the backend's high latency, ensures scalability for 3,000 concurrent users, and provides a seamless, real-time user experience without hitting governor limits or timeout constraints.
NEW QUESTION # 51
......
Exam Integration-Architect Quiz: https://www.examcollectionpass.com/Salesforce/Integration-Architect-practice-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Integration-Architect dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamcollectionPass: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VPL2RYGHFddjFgnkd7rwcWdvlZdu3A7L