BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Prep4pass JS-Dev-101 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CNTX5hQlIuiRlDjoMOWwKudk-frL44j6
We committed to providing you with the best possible Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer - Multiple Choice (JS-Dev-101) practice test material to succeed in the Salesforce JS-Dev-101 exam. With real JS-Dev-101 exam questions in PDF, customizable Salesforce JS-Dev-101 practice exams, free demos, and 24/7 support, you can be confident that you are getting the best possible JS-Dev-101 Exam Material for the test. Buy today and start your journey to Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer - Multiple Choice (JS-Dev-101) exam success with Prep4pass!
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> JS-Dev-101 Downloadable PDF <<
Don't waste much more time on preparing for a test. Hurry to purchase Prep4pass Salesforce JS-Dev-101 certification training dumps. With the exam dumps, you will know how to effectively prepare for your exam. This is precious tool that can let you sail through JS-Dev-101 test with no mistakes. Missing the chance, I am sure you must regret it. Thus, don't hesitate and act quickly.
NEW QUESTION # 125
Given the JavaScript below:
01 function filterDOM(searchString){
02 const parsedSearchString = searchString && searchString.toLowerCase();
03 document.querySelectorAll('.account').forEach(account => {
04 const accountName = account.innerHTML.toLowerCase();
05 account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString) ? /* Insert code here */
06 });
07 }
Which code should replace the placeholder comment on line 05 to hide accounts that do not match the search string?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript knowledge:
Line 05 uses the conditional (ternary) operator:
condition ? valueIfTrue : valueIfFalse
In this specific code:
account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString)
? /* valueIfTrue */
: /* valueIfFalse */;
accountName.includes(parsedSearchString) returns:
true if the accountName string contains the parsedSearchString,
false otherwise.
The requirement is:
Hide accounts that do not match the search string.
That means:
If the account name includes the search string → it should be visible.
If the account name does not include the search string → it should be hidden.
The relevant property is:
account.style.display
For the display property:
Common values for showing elements:
'block', 'inline', 'inline-block', etc.
Common value for hiding elements:
'none' (element is not rendered and takes up no space).
So we want:
When accountName.includes(parsedSearchString) is true → show the element, e.g. display = 'block'.
When false → hide the element, display = 'none'.
Therefore the assignment should be:
account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString) ? 'block' : 'none'; This matches option A:
'block' : 'none'
Why other options are incorrect:
B . 'none' : 'block'
This would hide matching accounts and show non-matching accounts, which is the opposite of the requirement.
C . 'hidden' : 'visible'
These are not valid values for the display property; they belong to the visibility property (visibility: 'hidden' | 'visible'), not display.
D . 'visible' : 'hidden'
Same issue as C: not valid for display, and reversed logic compared to requirement.
Thus, to correctly show matching accounts and hide non-matching ones, the ternary must be:
'block' : 'none'
Reference of JavaScript knowledge documents or Study Guide (concept names only):
Conditional (ternary) operator condition ? exprIfTrue : exprIfFalse
String.prototype.includes for substring checks
DOM APIs: document.querySelectorAll and forEach on NodeLists
Element styling via element.style.display
CSS display property: block vs none
________________________________________
NEW QUESTION # 126
Refer to the following code:
01 let obj = {
02 foo: 1,
03 bar: 2
04 }
05 let output = []
06
07 for (let something of obj) {
08 output.push(something);
09 }
10
11 console.log(output);
What is the value of output on line 11?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript knowledge:
The key line is:
for (let something of obj) {
In JavaScript:
for...of is used to iterate over iterable objects, such as:
Arrays
Strings
Maps
Sets
Other objects that implement a [Symbol.iterator] method.
Plain JavaScript objects created with object literal {} are not iterable by default. They do not have [Symbol.iterator], so using for...of directly on them causes a runtime error.
Specifically:
for (let something of obj) { ... }
will throw a TypeError similar to:
obj is not iterable
Therefore, the loop body never executes, and console.log(output); is never reached without an error.
Why other options are incorrect:
B . [1, 2]
To get [1, 2], you could use Object.values(obj) and iterate that array.
But here, for...of obj never yields values because it throws an error.
C . ["foo", "bar"]
To get property names, you could use Object.keys(obj) with for...of.
Again, the code does not do that; it incorrectly tries to iterate the object directly.
D . ["foo:1", "bar:2"]
You would need both keys and values, combining them manually.
The given code does not implement such logic and fails before pushing anything into output.
Hence, the correct answer is:
Answe r: A
Study Guide / Concept Reference (no links):
Difference between for...of and for...in
Iterables in JavaScript and [Symbol.iterator]
Plain objects {} are not iterable by default
Correct patterns to iterate object keys/values (Object.keys, Object.values, Object.entries)
________________________________________
NEW QUESTION # 127
Which function should a developer use to repeatedly execute code at a fixed interval ?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 128
Given the JavaScript below:
01 function filterDOM(searchString){
02 const parsedSearchString = searchString && searchString.toLowerCase();
03 document.querySelectorAll('.account').forEach(account => {
04 const accountName = account.innerHTML.toLowerCase();
05 account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString) ? /* Insert code here */;
06 });
07 }
Which code should replace the placeholder comment on line 05 to hide accounts that do not match the search string?
Answer: B
Explanation:
We have a ternary:
account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString)
? /* if true */
: /* if false */;
Requirement:
If the account matches the search string → show it.
If it does not match → hide it.
For display:
Show: 'block' (or similar visible value).
Hide: 'none'.
So we want:
account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString)
? 'block'
: 'none';
That corresponds to option A.
Why others are wrong:
B, C use values suitable for visibility, not display.
D ('none' : 'block') inverts the logic, hiding matches and showing non-matches.
________________________________________
NEW QUESTION # 129
Refer to the following array:
Let arr = [ 1,2, 3, 4, 5];
Which three options result in x evaluating as [3, 4, 5] ?
Choose 3 answers.
Answer: B,C,D
NEW QUESTION # 130
......
Dear candidates, have you thought to participate in any Salesforce JS-Dev-101 exam training courses? In fact, you can take steps to pass the certification. Prep4pass Salesforce JS-Dev-101 Exam Training materials bear with a large number of the exam questions you need, which is a good choice. The training materials can help you pass the certification.
JS-Dev-101 Test Dumps Free: https://www.prep4pass.com/JS-Dev-101_exam-braindumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of Prep4pass JS-Dev-101 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CNTX5hQlIuiRlDjoMOWwKudk-frL44j6