さらに、MogiExam Platform-App-Builderダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ivKUlIIL5icwFhwOwgU4-3TNl27xXF0g
弊社はPlatform-App-Builder問題集を買ったお客様が試験に成功することを保証いたします。もしお客様は安心できないなら、弊社は無料のPlatform-App-Builderサンプルを提供いたしますから、お客様は弊社のウェブでサンプルを無料でダウンロードできて、お客様の要求にふさわしいということを確認してから、弊社のPlatform-App-Builder問題集を選ぶことができます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce Fundamentals | 23% | - AppExchange use cases and benefits - Data import/export and external data source considerations - Deployment planning strategies - Declarative vs programmatic customization boundaries |
| User Interface | 17% | - Lightning App Builder and record pages - Reports and dashboards design - Lightning Experience customization - Mobile app configuration - Custom buttons, links, and actions |
| App Deployment | 10% | - Deployment tools: Change Sets, Salesforce DX - Development environments and change management - Package development and installation - Testing and deployment best practices |
| Data Modeling and Management | 22% | - Data security and sharing model - Object relationships and schema design - Data validation and quality rules - Field types, formulas, and roll-up summaries - Record types and page layouts |
| Business Logic and Process Automation | 28% | - Process Builder and Flow Builder design - Approval processes - Automation tool selection and best practices - Workflow rules, field updates, and email alerts - Formula fields and validation rules |
>> Platform-App-Builder試験時間 <<
あなたは現在の状態を変更したいですか。変更したい場合、Salesforce Platform-App-Builder学習教材を買いましょう！Platform-App-Builder学習教材を利用すれば、Platform-App-Builder試験に合格できます。そして、Platform-App-Builder資格証明書を取得すると、あなたの生活、仕事はきっと良くなります。誰でも、明るい未来を取得する権利があります。だから、どんことにあっても、あきらめないでください。Platform-App-Builder学習教材はあなたが好きなものを手に入れることに役立ちます。
質問 # 40
Which two solutions prevent a formula field from being referenced by a Roll-Up Summary field? Choose 2 answers
正解：A、D
解説：
Treat the requirement as something users will depend on daily. The proper configuration is A. The NOW() function in the formula field; D. A cross-object field referenced in the formula field. In Salesforce terms, this is a formula logic issue. Formula and validation expressions must respect Salesforce data types. Picklists require picklist-aware handling, dates require date functions or date arithmetic, and image or text formulas must return the correct type.
The selected configuration is the professional answer because it is native, declarative, and placed at the right scope. If the requirement later expands, another administrator can inspect the same metadata area and understand how the behavior is being produced. That is far better than a solution that depends on hidden assumptions or user training.
The rejected choices solve different problems. B (A cross-object formula updating a field referenced by the formula field) should be rejected because A formula is calculated display logic and cannot always store static values or perform record updates. C (The CASE() function in the formula field) would be fragile here because A formula is calculated display logic and cannot always store static values or perform record updates. The configuration remains understandable for future admins because the decision is visible in metadata rather than buried in a workaround.
---
質問 # 41
Universal Containers (UC) needs a picklist field called Status on three Separate custom objects. UC has a requirement to share the list of values for this field Across each object. Which feature should an app builder use?
正解：C
解説：
A Global Picklist Value Set is used when the same picklist values must be reused across multiple objects and fields. Salesforce states that global picklist value sets let admins share values across objects and custom picklist fields.
Why not others:
A). Shared Custom Field is not a Salesforce feature for this requirement.
C). Dependent Picklist controls values based on another field.
D). Related Picklist is not the correct Salesforce feature.
質問 # 42
Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to simultaneously delete a Supplier's record and all Supplier ltem__c records if a partnership ends with a supplier.
What solution could an app builder use to meet the requirement?
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
The solution that an app builder should use to meet this requirement is master-detail relationship. A master-detail relationship is a type of relationship that creates a parent-child relationship between two objects, where the child records inherit the sharing and security settings of their parent record. The app builder can create a master-detail relationship between Supplier__c and SupplierItem__c objects, where Supplier__c is the parent object and SupplierItem__c is the child object. This way, when a Supplier__c record is deleted, all related SupplierItem__c records are also deleted automatically. Option A is incorrect because many-to-many relationship is not suitable for this requirement, as many-to-many relationship allows two objects to be linked in both directions through a junction object, but does not support cascading delete. Option B is incorrect because indirect lookup relationship is not suitable for this requirement, as indirect lookup relationship allows an external object to link with another object using an external ID field, but does not support cascading delete.
Option C is incorrect because hierarchical relationship is not suitable for this requirement, as hierarchical relationship allows users to use a lookup field that links an object with itself, but does not support cascading delete.
質問 # 43
Cloud Kicks has created a custom object called Interests which is joined to Accounts by way of a junction object called Account Interest. What is the impact to users attempting to view an Account and the associated Account Interest records if they are without read access to the Interest object?
正解：D
解説：
A good app builder does not chase the most familiar label. The best answer is C. Users will be unable to view the Account Interest records or the Interest records. The decision turns on record sharing targets. Manual record sharing can grant access to individual users, public groups, and roles with subordinates. It is a record- level access mechanism, separate from field-level security and permission set assignment.
This is how the same requirement would be handled in a well-governed Salesforce org: identify the controlling object, relationship, field, page, automation, or environment first, and then configure the native capability for that control point. The selected answer satisfies the requirement without requiring users to perform extra interpretation or administrators to maintain an unnecessary custom workaround.
The distractors are not equal substitutes. A (Users will be able to view the Account Interest records and will have read-only access to the Interest Records.) handles a different concern; it handles only part of the requirement and leaves the controlling Salesforce behavior unresolved. B (Users will be unable to view Account records that have a related Account Interest recor) is less defensible because it is not the most maintainable declarative control for this design. D (Users will be able to view the Account Interest record, but unable to view the field or any Information relating to the Interest recor) would be fragile here because it could produce an inconsistent result once different users, records, or apps are tested. That is the kind of solution a Salesforce admin can document, migrate, and troubleshoot without creating hidden technical debt.
---
質問 # 44
Which of the following is not a valid return type of a custom formula?
正解：C
質問 # 45
......
MogiExamのSalesforceのPlatform-App-Builder試験トレーニング資料を購入した後、君の受験のための知識をテストして、約束の時間での表現も評価します。MogiExamの SalesforceのPlatform-App-Builder試験トレーニング資料は高度に認証されたIT領域の専門家の経験と創造を含めているものです。そのけん異性は言うまでもありません。もし君はいささかな心配することがあるなら、あなたはうちの商品を購入する前に、MogiExamは無料でサンプルを提供することができます。
Platform-App-Builder模擬体験: https://www.mogiexam.com/Platform-App-Builder-exam.html
無料でクラウドストレージから最新のMogiExam Platform-App-Builder PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ivKUlIIL5icwFhwOwgU4-3TNl27xXF0g