What's more, part of that Prep4sures Plat-Arch-204 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CjVV8smID5OhvW_fKNa8i-Us7m5jGAhp
This free Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam questions demo download facility is available in all three Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps formats. Just choose the best Prep4sures Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam demo questions format and download it quickly. If you think that Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps can work for you then take your buying decision.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> Plat-Arch-204 Valid Dumps Demo <<
It is widely accepted that where there is a will, there is a way; so to speak, a man who has a settled purpose will surely succeed. To obtain the Plat-Arch-204 certificate is a wonderful and rapid way to advance your position in your career. In order to reach this goal of passing the Plat-Arch-204 Exam, you need more external assistance to help yourself. With our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions, you will not only get aid to gain your dreaming certification, but also you can enjoy the first-class service online.
NEW QUESTION # 115
A large enterprise customer is implementing Salesforce. Current systems include ERP for invoicing/fulfillment and a Marketing solution for email. Associates need to view and log interactions in Salesforce. Which system should be the system of record for customers and prospects?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To achieve a "Customer 360" view where sales and service associates have the context needed for daily interactions, Salesforce is the logical System of Record (SoR) for customer and prospect engagement.
While the ERP remains the master for financial transactions (invoices) and the Marketing tool masters campaign analytics, Salesforce should house the core "Golden Record" of the customer. This is achieved by integrating relevant data from the ERP (order status, invoice history) and Marketing (lead source, email engagement) into Salesforce. This strategy (Option A) empowers associates to log interactions and view history in one place, fulfilling the primary goal of the CRM implementation while avoiding the complexity of a new custom database (Option B) or trying to force prospect-level engagement data into a rigid ERP (Option C).
NEW QUESTION # 116
An integration architect needs to build a solution that will use the Streaming API, but the data loss should be minimized, even when the client re-connects every couple of days. Which two types of Streaming API events should be considered?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a robust event-driven architecture, "durability" is the ability of a system to retain events so that a subscriber can retrieve them even after being offline. For an architect needing to minimize data loss over "every couple of days," the selection must focus on event types that support a high retention window.
Salesforce provides two modern event types specifically designed for high-scale, durable messaging:
Change Data Capture (CDC): This automatically broadcasts changes to Salesforce records (Create, Update, Delete, Undelete). CDC events are highly durable and are retained in the event bus for 72 hours (3 days).
High-Volume Platform Events: These are custom events defined by the architect. Like CDC, High-Volume Platform Events also provide a 72-hour retention window.
Earlier versions of the Streaming API, such as PushTopic Events and Generic Events (Option C and parts of A), typically offered a 24-hour retention window, which would not satisfy the requirement of a client re-connecting "every couple of days" (potentially 48-72 hours later).
By utilizing CDC and High-Volume Platform Events, the architect can leverage the Replay ID. When the client re-connects, it can send the Replay ID of the last event it successfully processed. Salesforce then "replays" all events that occurred during the client's downtime from that specific point, up to the 72-hour limit. This mechanism ensures zero data loss for planned or unplanned outages lasting up to three days, making it the most resilient choice for the specified requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 117
A new Salesforce program requires data updates between internal systems and Salesforce. Which relevant detail should an integration architect seek to solve for integration architecture needs?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the "Discovery" phase of integration architecture, the architect must translate abstract business needs into technical requirements. The most critical variables that define the Integration Pattern are Timing and Volume.
An architect cannot choose between the REST API, Streaming API, Bulk API, or Outbound Messaging without knowing:
Latency Requirements: Does the business need the update in 200 milliseconds (Synchronous), 2 minutes (Near Real-Time), or 24 hours (Batch)?
Frequency: Is the data updated every time a user clicks a button, or once at the end of the day?
Volume: Are we moving 10 records at a time or 10 million?
Option A focuses on UI/UX and licensing, which are project management concerns. Option B focuses on resource allocation and governance. While important for the project, they do not inform the technical design of the data flow.
By specifically seeking out Timing aspects (Synchronous vs. Asynchronous) and Update Frequency, the architect can apply the Salesforce Integration Decision Matrix. For instance, a "Real-time" requirement for small volumes leads to a Request-Reply pattern via Apex Callouts. A "Nightly" requirement for large volumes leads to a Batch Data Synchronization pattern via the Bulk API. Identifying these "Non-Functional Requirements" (NFRs) early is the only way to ensure the architecture is scalable and stays within platform governor limits.
NEW QUESTION # 118
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When an enterprise architect identifies complex infrastructure needs such as caching, queuing, and sophisticated event routing, it signals that a point-to-point integration architecture is insufficient. In such cases, the Integration Architect should recommend a Middleware-mediated architecture.
Middleware tools, such as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) or an iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service), are specifically designed to fulfill these complex "Quality of Service" (QoS) requirements. In a publish/subscribe scenario, the middleware acts as the central orchestrator. It can receive a single "Fire and Forget" event from a publisher (like Salesforce) and then manage the technical complexities of routing that message to multiple active subscribers.
Middleware handles infrastructure-level tasks such as message queuing for offline systems, automatic retries with exponential backoff, and error handling with alerts-capabilities that are either unavailable or difficult to scale within Salesforce natively. Performing message transformation and protocol translation (e.g., SOAP to REST) within the middleware layer also protects Salesforce's Apex CPU limits. By leveraging middleware for these concerns, the architect ensures that Salesforce remains a performant engagement layer while the middleware provides the robust technical backbone for a resilient enterprise landscape.
NEW QUESTION # 119
When a user clicks "Check Preferences" as part of a Lightning flow, preferences from an externally hosted RESTful service are to be checked in real time. The service has OpenAPI 2.0 definitions. Which integration pattern and mechanism should be selected?
Answer: B
Explanation:
This scenario describes a classic Request and Reply pattern where a user action in the UI requires an immediate, synchronous response from an external system to determine the next step in a business process (the Flow).
The requirement specifies that an OpenAPI 2.0 (Swagger) definition is available. For an Integration Architect, this is a prime use case for External Services. External Services allow you to import an OpenAPI schema and automatically generate "Invocable Actions" that can be used directly in Flow Builder without writing a single line of Apex code.
Why this is the best fit:
Low Code: It fulfills the requirement purely through declarative configuration, which reduces maintenance and development costs.
Real-Time: It performs a synchronous HTTP callout and waits for the Boolean/String values to be returned to the Flow variables.
Type Safety: Because it uses the OpenAPI definition, Salesforce understands the data types (Boolean/String) natively.
Option A (Data Virtualization) is more suitable for viewing and searching large external datasets as if they were records; it is over-engineered for a simple "check status" function. Option C (Remote Call-In) is the inverse of the requirement; it refers to an external system calling into Salesforce. By using Enhanced External Services, the architect provides a scalable, declarative solution that perfectly aligns with modern Salesforce development best practices for real-time external system interaction.
NEW QUESTION # 120
......
This is a simple and portable document of real Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Questions. It contains actual Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam questions and answers and can be helpful for quick revision or for studying on the go. It is also printable so you can easily study on a hard copy of the pdf having a break from staring.
Plat-Arch-204 New Dumps Ebook: https://www.prep4sures.top/Plat-Arch-204-exam-dumps-torrent.html
P.S. Free & New Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4sures: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CjVV8smID5OhvW_fKNa8i-Us7m5jGAhp