BONUS!!! Fast2test Data-Engineer-Associate 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AjS0snYLNkBZbcSyrw4K1naPn7rkZEbq
Fast2test 에서 출시한 Amazon인증Data-Engineer-Associate시험덤프는 100%시험통과율을 보장해드립니다. 엘리트한 IT전문가들이 갖은 노력으로 연구제작한Amazon인증Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는 PDF버전과 소프트웨어버전 두가지 버전으로 되어있습니다. 구매전 PDF버전무료샘플로Fast2test제품을 체험해보고 구매할수 있기에 신뢰하셔도 됩니다. 시험불합격시 불합격성적표로 덤프비용을 환불받을수 있기에 아무런 고민을 하지 않으셔도 괜찮습니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Orchestrate data pipelines
|
| Topic 2: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Automate data pipelines
|
| Topic 3: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Manage data privacy and compliance
|
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Manage data lifecycle
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate시험난이도 <<
우리 Fast2test 에는 최신의Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate학습가이드가 있습니다. Fast2test의 부지런한 IT전문가들이 자기만의 지식과 끊임없는 노력과 경험으로 최고의Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate합습자료로Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate인증시험을 응시하실 수 있습니다.Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate인증시험은 IT업계에서의 비중은 아주 큽니다. 시험신청하시는분들도 많아지고 또 많은 분들이 우리Fast2test의Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate자료로 시험을 패스했습니다. 이미 패스한 분들의 리뷰로 우리Fast2test의 제품의 중요함과 정확함을 증명하였습니다.
질문 # 11
A data engineer needs to use AWS Step Functions to design an orchestration workflow. The workflow must parallel process a large collection of data files and apply a specific transformation to each file.
Which Step Functions state should the data engineer use to meet these requirements?
정답：D
설명：
Option C is the correct answer because the Map state is designed to process a collection of data in parallel by applying the same transformation to each element. The Map state can invoke a nested workflow for each element, which can be another state machine or a Lambda function. The Map state will wait until all the parallel executions are completed before moving to the next state.
Option A is incorrect because the Parallel state is used to execute multiple branches of logic concurrently, not to process a collection of data. The Parallel state can have different branches with different logic and states, whereas the Map state has only one branch that is applied to each element of the collection.
Option B is incorrect because the Choice state is used to make decisions based on a comparison of a value to a set of rules. The Choice state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.
Option D is incorrect because the Wait state is used to delay the state machine from continuing for a specified time. The Wait state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.
:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Orchestration, Section 5.3: AWS Step Functions, Pages 131-132 Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 5: Data Orchestration, Lesson 5.2: AWS Step Functions, Pages 9-10 AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Step Functions Developer Guide, Step Functions Concepts, State Types, Map State, Pages 1-3
질문 # 12
A hotel management company receives daily data files from each of its hotels. The company wants to upload its data to AWS. The company plans to use Amazon Athena to access the files. The company needs to protect the files from accidental deletion. The company will develop an application on its on-premises servers to automatically forward the files to a fully managed AWS ingestion service.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
정답：D
설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (150-250 words)
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed data ingestion service that enables reliable and scalable delivery of streaming and batch data into Amazon S3 with minimal operational overhead. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fully managed AWS ingestion service while avoiding the need to provision, scale, or manage infrastructure.
By using the Amazon Kinesis Agent on the on-premises servers, the company can automatically forward daily data files to Kinesis Data Firehose. Firehose handles buffering, retry logic, scaling, and delivery without requiring administrative effort. Delivering the data to Amazon S3 allows seamless integration with Amazon Athena, which natively queries data stored in S3 without requiring data movement or transformation.
Enabling Amazon S3 versioning protects files from accidental deletion by preserving previous versions of objects. This aligns with AWS best practices for data durability and governance, especially for analytics workloads and compliance requirements.
Other options introduce unnecessary operational complexity. AWS DataSync with Amazon EFS is not optimized for Athena-based analytics. AWS Glue jobs and Amazon RDS are unsuitable for file-based analytical access. A self-managed Apache Kafka solution with Amazon MSK significantly increases operational overhead.
Therefore, option B is the most efficient, scalable, and operationally optimal solution according to AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate best practices.
질문 # 13
A retail company uses an Amazon Redshift data warehouse and an Amazon S3 bucket. The company ingests retail order data into the S3 bucket every day.
The company stores all order data at a single path within the S3 bucket. The data has more than 100 columns. The company ingests the order data from a third-party application that generates more than 30 files in CSV format every day. Each CSV file is between 50 and 70 MB in size.
The company uses Amazon Redshift Spectrum to run queries that select sets of columns. Users aggregate metrics based on daily orders. Recently, users have reported that the performance of the queries has degraded. A data engineer must resolve the performance issues for the queries.
Which combination of steps will meet this requirement with LEAST developmental effort? (Select TWO.)
정답：B,E
설명：
The performance issue in Amazon Redshift Spectrum queries arises due to the nature of CSV files, which are row-based storage formats. Spectrum is more optimized for columnar formats, which significantly improve performance by reducing the amount of data scanned. Also, partitioning data based on relevant columns like order date can further reduce the amount of data scanned, as queries can focus only on the necessary partitions.
A . Configure the third-party application to create the files in a columnar format:
Columnar formats (like Parquet or ORC) store data in a way that is optimized for analytical queries because they allow queries to scan only the columns required, rather than scanning all columns in a row-based format like CSV.
Amazon Redshift Spectrum works much more efficiently with columnar formats, reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned, which improves query performance.
Reference:
C . Partition the order data in the S3 bucket based on order date:
Partitioning the data on columns like order date allows Redshift Spectrum to skip scanning unnecessary partitions, leading to improved query performance.
By organizing data into partitions, you minimize the number of files Spectrum has to read, further optimizing performance.
Alternatives Considered:
B (Develop an AWS Glue ETL job): While consolidating files can improve performance by reducing the number of small files (which can be inefficient to process), it adds additional ETL complexity. Switching to a columnar format (Option A) and partitioning (Option C) provides more significant performance improvements with less development effort.
D and E (JSON-related options): Using JSON format or the SUPER type in Redshift introduces complexity and isn't as efficient as the proposed solutions, especially since JSON is not a columnar format.
Amazon Redshift Spectrum Documentation
Columnar Formats and Data Partitioning in S3
질문 # 14
A data engineer is designing a new data lake architecture for a company. The data engineer plans to use Apache Iceberg tables and AWS Glue Data Catalog to achieve fast query performance and enhanced metadata handling. The data engineer needs to query historical data for trend analysis and optimize storage costs for a large volume of event data.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST development effort?
정답：B
설명：
Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering is designed to optimize storage costs by automatically moving objects between access tiers based on access patterns. Since Apache Iceberg works with S3 storage, using Intelligent-Tiering provides cost-efficiency without the need for custom development or jobs.
* Option B improves performance but doesn't optimize cost automatically.
* Option C is not a real AWS Glue feature - Glue does not automatically optimize Iceberg storage.
* Option D requires custom development effort, which is contrary to the requirement.
"S3 Intelligent-Tiering is ideal for data lakes and analytics use cases that access data irregularly." Reference: AWS Documentation - S3 Intelligent-Tiering
질문 # 15
A security company stores IoT data that is in JSON format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The data structure can change when the company upgrades the IoT devices. The company wants to create a data catalog that includes the IoT data. The company's analytics department will use the data catalog to index the data.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
정답：D
설명：
The best solution to meet the requirements of creating a data catalog that includes the IoT data, and allowing the analytics department to index the data, most cost-effectively, is to create an Amazon Athena workgroup, explore the data that is in Amazon S3 by using Apache Spark through Athena, and provide the Athena workgroup schema and tables to the analytics department.
Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python1. Amazon Athena also supports Apache Spark, an open-source distributed processing framework that can run large-scale data analytics applications across clusters of servers2. You can use Athena to run Spark code on data in Amazon S3 without having to set up, manage, or scale any infrastructure. You can also use Athena to create and manage external tables that point to your data in Amazon S3, and store them in an external data catalog, such as AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon Athena Data Catalog, or your own Apache Hive metastore3. You can create Athena workgroups to separate query execution and resource allocation based on different criteria, such as users, teams, or applications4. You can share the schemas and tables in your Athena workgroup with other users or applications, such as Amazon QuickSight, for data visualization and analysis5.
Using Athena and Spark to create a data catalog and explore the IoT data in Amazon S3 is the most cost-effective solution, as you pay only for the queries you run or the compute you use, and you pay nothing when the service is idle1. You also save on the operational overhead and complexity of managing data warehouse infrastructure, as Athena and Spark are serverless and scalable. You can also benefit from the flexibility and performance of Athena and Spark, as they support various data formats, including JSON, and can handle schema changes and complex queries efficiently.
Option A is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating a new AWS Glue workload to orchestrate theingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Glue Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components6. AWS Glue Schema Registry is a service that allows you to centrally store and manage the schemas of your streaming data in AWS Glue Data Catalog7. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores8. Amazon Redshift Serverless is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to run and scale analytics without having to manage data warehouse infrastructure9. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your ETL jobs8. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue and Amazon Redshift Serverless would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless, and then query it from there, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option B is not the best solution, as creating an Amazon Redshift provisioned cluster, creating an Amazon Redshift Spectrum database for the analytics department to explore the data that is in Amazon S3, and creating Redshift stored procedures to load the data into Amazon Redshift, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters are clusters that you create and manage by specifying the number and type of nodes, and the amount of storage and compute capacity10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL11. Redshift stored procedures are SQL statements that you can define and store in Amazon Redshift, and then call them by using the CALL command12. While these features are powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters charge you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries11. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters and Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision andmanage the cluster, create an external schema and database for the data in Amazon S3, and load the data into the cluster using stored procedures, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option D is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating AWS Lambda user defined functions (UDFs) by using the Amazon Redshift Data API, and creating an AWS Step Functions job to orchestrate the ingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers13. AWS Lambda UDFs are Lambda functions that you can invoke from within an Amazon Redshift query. Amazon Redshift Data API is a service that allows you to run SQL statements on Amazon Redshift clusters using HTTP requests, without needing a persistent connection. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Lambda charges you based on the number of requests and the duration of your functions13. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. AWS Step Functions charges you based on the number of state transitions in your workflows. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue, AWS Lambda, Amazon Redshift Data API, and AWS Step Functions would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to create and invoke Lambda functions to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless using the Data API, and coordinate the ingestion process using Step Functions, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark. References:
What is Amazon Athena?
Apache Spark on Amazon Athena
Creating tables, updating the schema, and adding new partitions in the Data Catalog from AWS Glue ETL jobs Managing Athena workgroups Using Amazon QuickSight to visualize data in Amazon Athena AWS Glue Data Catalog AWS Glue Schema Registry What is AWS Glue?
Amazon Redshift Serverless
Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters
Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift
What is AWS Lambda?
[Creating and using AWS Lambda UDFs]
[Using the Amazon Redshift Data API]
[What is AWS Step Functions?]
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
질문 # 16
......
Fast2test에서 Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프를 구입하시면 퍼펙트한 구매후 서비스를 제공해드립니다. Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프가 업데이트되면 업데이트된 최신버전을 무료로 서비스로 드립니다. 시험에서 불합격성적표를 받으시면 덤프구매시 지불한 덤프비용은 환불해드립니다.
Data-Engineer-Associate시험대비덤프: https://kr.fast2test.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-premium-file.html
참고: Fast2test에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AjS0snYLNkBZbcSyrw4K1naPn7rkZEbq