CT-GenAI日本語受験攻略、CT-GenAI模擬問題集

CT-GenAIの試験問題は頻繁に更新され、十分な数のテストバンクを取得して、理論と実践の傾向を追跡できることが保証されます。つまり、CT-GenAIトレーニング資料は多くの利点を高め、CT-GenAIガイド急流をよりよく理解するためです。 CT-GenAI実践ガイドを購入して、私たちISQIを信頼してください。それでも私たちを完全に信じられない場合は、CT-GenAI学習質問の機能と機能の紹介をお読みください。

ISQI CT-GenAI Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Risks and Testing Challenges for Generative AI30%- Quality Risks Specific to Generative AI
  • 1. Dependency on external components
  • 2. Input sensitivity (prompt brittleness)
  • 3. Inconsistent responses across runs
  • 4. Offensive, harmful, or biased content
  • 5. Inappropriate output for the context
  • 6. Incorrect or fabricated outputs (hallucinations)
- Testing Challenges for Generative AI
  • 1. Complexity of the AI component
  • 2. Coverage challenges
  • 3. Regulatory and compliance considerations
  • 4. Test oracle problem
  • 5. Subjectivity of quality assessment
  • 6. Ethical testing concerns
  • 7. Non-deterministic output behavior
Fundamentals of Generative AI20%- Generative AI Concepts
  • 1. Hallucinations
  • 2. Alignment and guardrails
  • 3. Training data and context windows
  • 4. AI model behavior
  • 5. Emergent capabilities and limitations
  • 6. Model types (Base, Instruction-tuned, RAG)
- AI Development Lifecycle
  • 1. Deployment and monitoring
  • 2. Evaluation
  • 3. Data collection, preparation, and curation
  • 4. Model training and fine-tuning
- AI Terminology
  • 1. Deep Learning
  • 2. Tokens and prompts
  • 3. Transformer architecture
  • 4. Generative AI (GenAI)
  • 5. Machine Learning (ML)
  • 6. Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • 7. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Testing Activities for Generative AI30%- Requirements-Based Testing
  • 1. Functional requirements for AI-based systems
  • 2. AI-related quality requirements
  • 3. Non-functional requirements for AI-based systems
- Prompt-Based Testing
  • 1. Test case design using prompts
  • 2. Test data creation with GenAI
  • 3. Prompt engineering basics
- Traceability and Documentation
  • 1. Test coverage of AI model components
  • 2. Documentation requirements for AI testing
- Model and Output Evaluation
  • 1. Human evaluation methods
  • 2. Output correctness and quality assessment
  • 3. Automated evaluation methods
  • 4. Metamorphic testing
  • 5. Checkpoint testing
Tools for Testing Generative AI20%- Using Tools for Common Testing Activities
  • 1. Prompt testing tools
  • 2. Model evaluation tools
  • 3. Security testing tools
  • 4. Simulation and monitoring tools
- Testing Tools Overview
  • 1. Categories of GenAI testing tools
  • 2. Selecting appropriate tools for specific testing needs

>> CT-GenAI日本語受験攻略 <<

ハイパスレートのCT-GenAI日本語受験攻略 & 合格スムーズCT-GenAI模擬問題集 | 実際的なCT-GenAI赤本勉強

チャンスはいつも準備がある人のために存在しています。IT業界で就職する前に、あなたはISQIのCT-GenAI試験に合格したら、あなたに満足させる仕事を探す準備をよくしました。ISQIのCT-GenAI試験に合格しがたいですが、我々Jpshikenの提供するISQIのCT-GenAI試験の資料を通して多くの人は試験に合格しました。あなたはその中の一員になりたいですか。我々の商品にあなたを助けさせましょう。

ISQI ISTQB Certified Tester Testing with Generative AI (CT-GenAI) v1.0 認定 CT-GenAI 試験問題 (Q27-Q32):

質問 # 27
You must generate test cases for a new payments rule. The system includes API specifications stored in a vector database and prior tests in a relational database. Which of the following sequences BEST represents the correct order for applying a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) workflow?
i. Retrieve semantically similar specification chunks from the vector database ii. Feed both retrieved datasets as context for the LLM to generate new test cases iii. Retrieve relevant historical cases from the relational database iv. Submit a focused query describing the new test requirement

正解:A

解説:
A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) workflow is designed to "ground" an LLM's output in specific, verifiable data. The logical flow begins with an initial input or "focused query" (Step iv) that defines the tester's goal-in this case, generating cases for a new payments rule. The system then uses this query to perform a semantic search in avector database(Step i) to find the most relevant "chunks" of the new API specification. Following this, the system retrieves complementary data from therelational database(Step iii), such as historical test cases that might provide structural patterns or regression context. Finally, all the retrieved information-the new specs and the historical context-is bundled together and "fed" into the LLM as part of an augmented prompt (Step ii). This ensures the LLM doesn't hallucinate rules but instead synthesizes the new requirements with established organizational testing standards. Following the order in Option B ensures that the model is provided with the most relevant and logically organized context prior to generating the final testware.


質問 # 28
A team notices vague, inconsistent LLM outputs for the same story for two different prompts. Which technique BEST helps choose the stronger wording among two prompt versions using predefined metrics?

正解:D

解説:
A/B testing, also known as split testing, is a systematic empirical method used to compare two versions of a prompt (Version A and Version B) to determine which one performs better based on predefined evaluation metrics. In the realm of LLMs, where outputs can be stochastic (probabilistic), A/B testing is essential for mitigating inconsistency. When a team encounters vague or varying results for a user story, simply modifying the prompt iteratively (Option B) may improve the result but does not provide a statistical or objective basis for why one version is superior. Byrunning A/B tests, testers can evaluate prompts against specific KPIs such as accuracy, relevance, format adherence, or the absence of hallucinations. This process involves sending the same input data through both prompt versions multiple times and scoring the outputs. The version that consistently yields the "stronger wording" or more precise testware is then selected as the production standard. This data-driven approach is a cornerstone of prompt engineering in professional environments, ensuring that the most effective linguistic structures are utilized to maximize the model's performance and reliability.


質問 # 29
Which statement about data privacy risks in GenAI-assisted testing is INCORRECT?

正解:D

解説:
The statement that "Strict GDPR compliance eliminates all privacy risk" isincorrectbecause compliance is a legal and procedural framework, not a foolproof technical shield against all possible risks. Even within a GDPR-compliant environment, risks such as "model inversion" attacks, accidental data leakage through
"membership inference," or the unintentional generation of Sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (SPII) can still occur. Data privacy in GenAI is complex because LLMs function by processing and sometimes retaining patterns from the data they are fed. As noted in the CT-GenAI syllabus, some tools may process data in ways that are not fully transparent (Option A), and outputs can inadvertently include snippets of sensitive data used during the prompting or training phase (Option B). Furthermore, failing to adhere to regulations like GDPR or the EU AI Act certainly leads to legal and financial exposure (Option D). Therefore, while compliance frameworks significantly mitigate risk, they do not "eliminate" it; a robust GenAI strategy requires ongoing technical controls, data masking, and human oversight to manage residual privacy threats effectively.


質問 # 30
Which technique MOST directly reduces hallucinations by grounding the model in project realities?

正解:D

解説:
Hallucinations-where an LLM generates factually incorrect or nonsensical information-occur primarily when the model lacks sufficient specific information and "fills in the gaps" using probabilistic patterns from its training data. The most effective mitigation strategy is "grounding," which involves providing the model with detailed, project-specific context. By including technical specifications, existing API schemas, business rules, and identified constraints within the prompt, the tester restricts the model's operational space to the
"project realities." This ensures the model does not have to guess or improvise details about the System Under Test (SUT). In contrast, randomizing prompts (Option B) or relying on generic examples (Option C) increases the likelihood of inconsistent and inaccurate outputs. Furthermore, using "longer" or higher temperature settings (Option D) actually encourages creativity and randomness, which is the opposite of the precision required for testing and significantly increases the risk of hallucinations. Therefore, rich contextual grounding is the technical foundation for reliable AI-assisted test analysis.


質問 # 31
What does an embedding represent in an LLM?

正解:D

解説:
Embeddingsare a fundamental concept in modern Natural Language Processing (NLP) and LLMs. They are high-dimensional numerical vectors-essentially lists of numbers-that represent the meaning (semantics) of a piece of text (a word, sentence, or document). Unlike traditional keyword matching, which looks for identical strings of characters, embeddings allow the model to understand the "closeness" of concepts. For example, in a vector space, the word "bug" would be mathematically closer to "defect" or "error" than to
"feature" or "requirement." This captures the semantic relationship between terms. This technology is the backbone of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) used in testing: when a tester queries a documentation set, the system converts the query into an embedding and looks for other chunks of text with similar vector values. This allows the AI to retrieve relevant context even if the exact keywords do not match. It is not about logical rules (Option C) or groups of tokens (Option A), but rather a mathematical representation of language that enables machines to process human meaning.


質問 # 32
......

試験の準備をするためにJpshikenのISQIのCT-GenAI試験トレーニング資料を買うのは冒険的行為と思ったとしたら、あなたの人生の全てが冒険なことになります。一番遠いところへ行った人はリスクを背負うことを恐れない人です。また、JpshikenのISQIのCT-GenAI試験トレーニング資料が信頼できるのは多くの受験生に証明されたものです。JpshikenのISQIのCT-GenAI試験トレーニング資料を利用したらきっと成功できますから、Jpshikenを選ばない理由はないです。

CT-GenAI模擬問題集: https://www.jpshiken.com/CT-GenAI_shiken.html