With precious time passing away, many exam candidates are making progress with high speed and efficiency. You cannot lag behind and with our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice materials, and your goals will be easier to fix. So stop idling away your precious time and begin your review with the help of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice materials as soon as possible. By using them, it will be your habitual act to learn something with efficiency. With the cumulative effort over the past years, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice materials have made great progress with passing rate up to 98 to 100 percent among the market.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Coverage and Capacity Optimization | 30% | - Capacity planning, load balancing and optimization - Interference analysis and mitigation techniques - Coverage analysis, tuning and optimization |
| Topic 2: Mobility and Handover Optimization | 20% | - Mobility robustness and optimization - Handover parameters and algorithms - Inter-RAT mobility and optimization |
| Topic 3: Quality of Service and Resource Management | 15% | - QoS parameters, scheduling and admission control - Radio resource management and optimization |
| Topic 4: Advanced Optimization and SON Features | 10% | - Energy saving and advanced features - Self-Organizing Networks (SON) use cases and optimization |
| Topic 5: SRAN Performance Optimization Fundamentals | 25% | - Key performance indicators (KPIs) definition and measurement - Performance optimization principles and methodology - Network performance monitoring and analysis tools |
>> SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Top Exam Dumps <<
Are you a new comer in your company and eager to make yourself outstanding? Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam materials can help you. After a few days' studying and practicing with our products you will easily pass the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization examination. God helps those who help themselves. If you choose our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Study Guide, you will find God just by your side. The only thing you have to do is just to make your choice and study. Isn't it very easy? So know more about our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice engine right now!
NEW QUESTION # 22
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
NEW QUESTION # 23
A customer complains about coverage reduction after modernization of 4G TDD 4x4 sites to Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 with AEHC module 64T64R . Which of the following statements regarding RF design changes to increase the coverage is correct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In a Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 AEHC 64T64R deployment, LTE and NR share the same Massive MIMO active antenna system. Public Nokia material identifies AEHC as an AirScale Massive MIMO
64T64R B41 radio product, and Nokia's AirScale Massive MIMO portfolio is designed for high-capacity 5G
/RAN deployments.
Unlike a passive antenna system where coverage is changed mainly by physical/electrical RET, Massive MIMO coverage is strongly influenced by beamforming profiles and beamforming weight parameters . In concurrent LTE/NR operation, the RF design must consider the shared active antenna behavior, not independent passive RET-style tilt control per technology.
Therefore, for concurrent 4G/5G mMIMO coverage adjustment, the correct statement is:
The tilt/coverage behavior for both 4G and 5G is controlled by mMIMOSecSectorBFProfName and beamforming weight profile parameters.
NEW QUESTION # 24
In a high-mobility network, the maximum cell size must be restricted to 33 km . Which PRACH format and restricted-set type should be used?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is Format 1 / Type B .
For PRACH planning, the selected preamble format must support the required cell radius. Format 0 is too short for a 33 km cell because it is typically suitable only up to around 14.5 km . Format 2 is also not suitable because its practical maximum cell radius is around 29.5 km , which is below the required 33 km . Therefore, a longer PRACH format is needed.
Because the scenario mentions high mobility , an unrestricted PRACH set is not preferred. High-mobility environments require a restricted set to handle Doppler effects and reduce ambiguity in PRACH preamble detection. Between the restricted-set options, Type B is the correct choice for this 33 km high-mobility case.
A matching Nokia-style question source also lists this exact scenario with Format 1 / Type B as option A.
NEW QUESTION # 25
The slice type SST value for Extreme Broadband is typically:
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In 5G network slicing, SST means Slice/Service Type . It identifies the high-level service category of a network slice.
Typical standardized SST values are:
SST = 1 # eMBB, enhanced Mobile Broadband
SST = 2 # URLLC, Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication
SST = 3 # MIoT/mMTC, Massive IoT or massive Machine Type Communication
SST = 4 # V2X-related slice type
"Extreme Broadband" is normally aligned with eMBB , because it refers to high data rate, high capacity, and broadband user experience.
Therefore, the SST value for Extreme Broadband is:
1.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.
NEW QUESTION # 27
......
The practice exams (desktop and web-based) are customizable, meaning you can set the MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) questions and time according to your needs to improve your preparation for the Professional Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification test. You can give multiple practice tests to improve yourself and even access the result of previously given tests from the history to avoid mistakes while taking the MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) test. The practice tests have been made according to the latest pattern so you can practice in real MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam environment and improve yourself daily.
Online SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Training: https://www.practicematerial.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-exam-materials.html