P.S. Free & New 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingDumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1POefwrv1aaflN2aNpmX4p3ZtCr1YPhVP
Passing the 312-97 exam is your best career opportunity. The rich experience with relevant certificates is important for enterprises to open up a series of professional vacancies for your choices. Our website's 312-97 learning quiz bank and learning materials look up the Latest 312-97 Questions and answers based on the topics you choose. This choice will serve as a breakthrough of your entire career, so prepared to be amazed by high quality and accuracy rate of our 312-97 study guide.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
>> 312-97 Reliable Test Syllabus <<
At the TrainingDumps offer students ECCouncil 312-97 practice test questions, and 24/7 support to ensure they do comprehensive preparation for the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam. TrainingDumps EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) practice test material covers all the key topics and areas of knowledge necessary to master the ECCouncil Certification Exam.
NEW QUESTION # 98
During a security review of a software deployment, the security team identified a critical vulnerability in the source code after the application was already in production. The development team had assumed their pipeline was secure, as security testing was part of the CI/CD workflow. However, further investigation revealed that only dynamic analysis was conducted post-build, leaving potential code-level vulnerabilities undetected before deployment. To mitigate this risk, the DevSecOps lead proposed integrating a Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool to detect security flaws early in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and prevent vulnerabilities from reaching production. Which approach ensures the effective use of SAST?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Effective SAST integration means scanning source code as part of the build and enforcing quality gates-breaking the build on critical issues-so vulnerabilities are caught early in the SDLC and never reach production. Running SAST after deployment contradicts shift-left, scanning without enforcement lets findings be ignored, and limiting SAST to dependencies ignores first-party code flaws.
NEW QUESTION # 99
Debra Aniston is a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and web applications. Her team has found various coding issues in the application code. Debra would like to fix coding issues before they exist. She recommended a DevSecOps tool to the software developer team that highlights bugs and security vulnerabilities with clear remediation guidance, which helps in fixing security issues before the code is committed. Based on the information given, which of the following tools has Debra recommended to the software development team?
Answer: D
Explanation:
SonarLint is a static code analysis tool designed specifically to be used inside developers' IDEs, where it provides immediate feedback while code is being written. It highlights bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells and, importantly, provides clear remediation guidance that explains why an issue exists and how it can be fixed. This aligns directly with Debra's requirement to fix issues "before they exist," meaning before code is committed to the repository.
Arachni and OWASP ZAP are dynamic application security testing tools that require a running application and are typically used later in the pipeline. Tenable.io is a vulnerability management platform focused on infrastructure and application scanning rather than real-time developer feedback. By using SonarLint, developers receive continuous guidance during coding, supporting the shift-left security approach in DevSecOps and reducing the cost and effort of fixing vulnerabilities later in the lifecycle.
NEW QUESTION # 100
David, a security engineer at a financial institution, is conducting a manual code review for a newly developed customer management portal. During his assessment, he notices that user inputs from HTML forms are directly concatenated into SQL queries without any additional processing. Concerned about potential security risks, he investigates further to determine if the application is vulnerable to SQL injection. Which of the following should David check to confirm the presence of an SQL injection vulnerability?
Answer: D
Explanation:
User input concatenated directly into SQL queries is the classic SQL injection pattern. David should check whether the code uses string concatenation to build queries; if it does, without parameterized queries or input validation, SQL injection is present. Stored procedures or dynamic table generation are not the deciding factor, and JavaScript/CSS are client-side and irrelevant to server-side SQL construction.
NEW QUESTION # 101
Emily Johnson, a DevSecOps Engineer at TechSupport Solutions, is responsible for securing the code repositories of a customer support software platform. To enhance security, she decides to integrate Snyk with AWS CodeCommit to monitor and remediate vulnerabilities in the stored code. Emily configures an Amazon EventBridge Rule to trigger AWS CodePipeline whenever new code is pushed to AWS CodeCommit. The pipeline then invokes a security scanning process, where Snyk CLI is executed to analyze the code for vulnerabilities. Once Snyk CLI completes the security scan, the results are sent to Snyk UI for further analysis and tracking. Which of the following AWS services interacts with Snyk CLI and sends the results to Snyk UI?
Answer: C
Explanation:
AWS CodeBuild is the build service in the pipeline that executes the Snyk CLI scan: the pipeline invokes CodeBuild, which runs Snyk CLI against the code and then sends results to the Snyk UI for tracking. CodePipeline orchestrates stages, CodeCommit stores source, and CodeDeploy deploys-none run the Snyk scan itself.
NEW QUESTION # 102
(Lisa Kramer carries an experience of 4 years as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company. The software development team of her organization has developed a Ruby on Rails web application and would like to find vulnerabilities in Ruby dependencies. Therefore, the team leader of the software development team approached Lisa for help in this regard. Which of the following SCA tool should Lisa use to detect vulnerabilities in Ruby dependencies?)
Answer: A
Explanation:
Bundler-Audit is an SCA tool designed specifically for Ruby applications. It analyzes the Gemfile and Gemfile.lock to identify dependencies and checks them against known vulnerability databases. Bandit is intended for Python code analysis, Retire.js targets JavaScript libraries, and Tenable.io focuses on infrastructure-level vulnerabilities. By using Bundler-Audit during the Code stage, DevSecOps teams can detect vulnerable Ruby gems early and ensure that only secure dependencies are used. This reduces the risk of exploiting known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and supports secure dependency management throughout the development lifecycle.
========
NEW QUESTION # 103
......
Our EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) PDF file is portable which means customers can carry this real questions document to any place. You just need smartphones, or laptops, to access this EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) PDF format. These EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) questions PDFs are also printable. So candidates who prefer to study in the old way which is paper study can print EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) questions PDF as well.
312-97 Exam Labs: https://www.trainingdumps.com/312-97_exam-valid-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingDumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1POefwrv1aaflN2aNpmX4p3ZtCr1YPhVP