IT-Fachleute sind sehr beliebt. Aber die Konkurrenz ist zugleich auch sehr heftig. So beteiligen sich viele IT-Fachleute an der autoritären SAVE International CVS IT-Zertifizierungsprüfung, um Ihre Position zu konsolidieren. Und unser ZertPruefung bietet speziell Bequemlichkeiten für den SAVE International CVS Kandidaten.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Value Methodology Job Plan | 30% | - Presentation and implementation phase - Function analysis phase - Development phase - Preparation phase - Evaluation phase - Information phase - Creative phase |
| Leadership and Facilitation | 15% | - Workshop facilitation skills - Stakeholder management and communication - Leading value study teams |
| Value Methodology Principles and Concepts | 25% | - Origins, development and application scope of Value Methodology - Definition and core concepts of Value - Value index, function and cost relationship |
| Standards, Ethics and Application | 10% | - Professional ethics and responsibilities - Application in different industries and sectors - SAVE International standards and guidelines |
| Tools and Techniques | 20% | - Creative thinking and idea generation methods - Cost analysis and worth assessment - Function analysis system technique (FAST) - Decision-making and evaluation tools |
Wir ZertPruefung haben viel Zeit und Mühe für die SAVE International CVS Prüfungssoftware eingesetzt, die für Sie entwickelt. Das Ziel ist nur, dass Sie wenig Zeit und Mühe aufwenden, um SAVE International CVS Prüfung zu bestehen. Die „100% Geld-zurück- Garantie “ ist kein leeres Geschwätz. Trotz unsere Verlässlichkeit auf unsere Produkte geben wir Ihnen die ganzen Gebühren der SAVE International CVS Prüfungssoftware rechtzeitig zurück, falls Sie keine befriedigte Hilfe davon finden. Allerdings glauben wir, dass die SAVE International CVS Prüfungssoftware will Ihrer Hoffnung nicht enttäuschen. Wir wünschen Ihnen viel Erfolg bei der Prüfung!
34. Frage
Place the process for building a work breakdown structure in the correct order:
Antwort:
Begründung:
Explanation:
Step 1 - Identify the major deliverables
Step 2 - Identify major supporting activities and tasks
Step 3 - Organize and structure the deliverables
Step 4 - Assign responsibility for deliverables
Step 5 - Verify the work breakdown structure
The correct sequence begins with identifying the major deliverables because a Work Breakdown Structure is deliverable-oriented. The team must first define what must be produced before it can break the work into manageable parts. After the major deliverables are clear, the next step is to identify the major supporting activities and tasks required to complete each deliverable.
The third step is to organize and structure the deliverables into a logical hierarchy. This converts the project scope into a structured framework that can be planned, estimated, tracked, and controlled. The fourth step is to assign responsibility for deliverables , because the WBS must support accountability. Each work element should have clear ownership so that implementation actions do not remain vague or unmanaged.
The final step is to verify the work breakdown structure . Verification confirms that the WBS is complete, logical, non-duplicative, and aligned with the intended scope. In VM practice, this supports implementation planning by connecting proposals, deliverables, responsibilities, and follow-up control.
References/topics: VM Programs; Implementation Planning; Work Breakdown Structure; Deliverable Breakdown; Responsibility Assignment; Project Control.
35. Frage
Match the following to their appropriate "How" direction on the function logic path for the prescription eyeglasses.
Antwort:
Begründung:
Explanation:
The correct "How" direction follows the classical FAST logic path from the broader purpose toward the dependent means of accomplishment. SAVE defines FAST as a graphical representation of dependent relationships between functions and states that a Classical FAST model displays function interrelationships using how-why logic . In this eyeglasses example, Improve vision is the higher-order purpose: it explains why the basic function exists. The basic function is Correct vision , because prescription eyeglasses exist primarily to correct the user's vision. Moving in the "How" direction, the system corrects vision by Position lenses and Secure lenses ; the frame, bridge, arms, and nose pads exist to keep corrective lenses in the proper relationship to the eyes. The farthest "How"/lower-order decision is Select eyeglasses and Select contact lenses , representing the selected means or alternative correction approach.
The distractors are not on the critical function logic path. Secure position and Resist damage are supporting or secondary dependability functions. Complement appearance is a sell/aesthetic function, because it improves user acceptance but does not define the primary functional logic. SAVE's glossary distinguishes higher-order, lower-order, and secondary functions and explains that secondary functions support the basic function through a specific design approach.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; How-Why Logic; Critical Function Logic Path; Basic, Higher-Order, Lower-Order, and Secondary Functions.
36. Frage
A VM study team struggles to reach consensus while evaluating an idea during the Evaluation Phase. Which approaches should the VM facilitator use?
Choose 3 answers.
Antwort: A,B,E
Begründung:
The correct approaches are A, B, and D because the facilitator's role in the Evaluation Phase is to keep the team in a structured, objective decision process rather than prematurely discarding ideas or resetting the workshop. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard defines the Evaluation Phase as the point where the team uses a structured process to select ideas with value-improvement potential while considering project functions, performance requirements, and resource limits. ( ) When consensus is difficult, the facilitator should first clarify the idea. Modifying the idea title can remove ambiguity, improve shared understanding, and ensure the team is evaluating the same concept. Asking for more information is also appropriate because disagreement often reflects insufficient technical, cost, risk, or implementation detail.
The facilitator must also ensure that every team member has provided input, since VM relies on multidisciplinary team judgment and stakeholder expertise. The Standard identifies the team as a multidisciplinary group chosen for relevant expertise and experience, including different points of view. ( ) Removing the idea is premature unless it clearly fails criteria, and restarting the evaluation process is unnecessary unless the entire evaluation basis is invalid.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; VM Facilitation; Team Consensus; Structured Evaluation; Idea Clarification.
37. Frage
Unwanted functions
Choose 3 answers.
Antwort: A,D,E
Begründung:
The correct answers are A, C, and E . In Value Methodology, an unwanted function is a negative or undesirable function created by the selected design approach, process method, or operating solution. The SAVE glossary defines an unwanted function as one identified by the customer, user, or stakeholder as undesirable and caused by the approach used to achieve the subject's purpose. The SAVE Value Methodology Standard similarly classifies it as a negative secondary function caused by the method used to achieve the basic function, such as heat generated by lighting that then requires cooling. ( UW Courses ) Therefore, C is correct because unwanted functions are typically byproducts of how another required or basic function is performed. A is correct because these negative functions can reduce performance, quality, reliability, safety, or user satisfaction. E is correct because unwanted functions consume resources through added mitigation, maintenance, energy, rework, or corrective measures.
Option D is incorrect because Value Index is used broadly in Function Analysis to compare cost and worth and select improvement opportunities, not to define unwanted functions. ( UW Courses ) Option B is too broad; unwanted functions may become targets for elimination, but that is not their defining characteristic.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Classification; Secondary Functions; Unwanted Functions; Function Cost and Worth.
38. Frage
What are typical examples of evaluation criteria used for a business process study during the Evaluation Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
Antwort: A,D
Begründung:
The correct answers are A. Efficiency and D. Scalability . In the Evaluation Phase, the VM team uses structured criteria to screen and rank creative ideas based on their ability to improve value while still delivering the required functions. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard defines VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team to improve value through function analysis, and it confirms that VM applies not only to products and construction projects but also to business procedures, services, manufacturing processes, and business plans . ( ) For a business process study , typical evaluation criteria focus on how well an alternative improves process performance. Efficiency is a primary criterion because business-process alternatives are commonly judged by cycle time, resource use, duplication reduction, workflow simplification, and productivity. Scalability is also typical because the improved process should remain effective as transaction volume, users, locations, or organizational complexity increase.
Environmental impact may be valid in sustainability-driven studies, construction, or product/process engineering, but it is not a typical core criterion for a general business-process VM study. Maintenance is more typical for physical assets, facilities, equipment, or technical systems. The Evaluation Phase specifically selects ideas that offer value improvement while considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Business Process Study; Evaluation Criteria; ; Scalability; Value Improvement.
39. Frage
......
ZertPruefung setzt sich aus den riesigen IT-Eliteteams zusammen. Sie alle haben hohe Autorität im IT-Bereich. Sie nutzen professionelle Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen aus, um den an den SAVE International CVS Zertifizierungsprüfungen beteiligenden Kandidaten die Prüfungsunterlagen zu bieten. Die Genauigkeit von SAVE International CVS Fragen Und Antworten aus ZertPruefung ist sehr hoch. Wir versprechen, dass Sie die Prüfung beim ersten Versuch 100% bestehen können. Außerdem stehen wir Ihnen einen einjährigen Update-Service zur Verfügung.
CVS Ausbildungsressourcen: https://www.zertpruefung.ch/CVS_exam.html