BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassTorrent Mule-Arch-201 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QCDrdEIuFO_Ehb5xUiz5aj7wByMHfyaw
Preparing for the Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) certification exam can be time-consuming and expensive. That's why we guarantee that our customers will pass the prepare for your Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) exam on the first attempt by using our product. By providing this guarantee, we save our customers both time and money, making our Mule-Arch-201 Practice material a wise investment in their career development.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks | 8% | - Alerting & Auditing - Anypoint Monitoring Tools - Analytics & Business Insights |
| Topic 2: Meeting API Quality Goals | 8% | - Resilience & Reliability Patterns - Unit & Integration Testing - API Performance Optimization |
| Topic 3: Deploying API Implementations to CloudHub | 11% | - Deployment Strategies - CloudHub Architecture - CloudHub 2.0 & Runtime Fabric |
| Topic 4: Architecting and Deploying API Implementations | 11% | - Disaster Recovery (DR) Strategies - High Availability (HA) Design - Mule Runtime Architecture |
| Topic 5: Designing and Sharing APIs | 11% | - API-Led Connectivity Approach - Anypoint Exchange for Sharing Assets - API Design Best Practices |
| Topic 6: Understanding the MuleSoft Platform & Application Networks | 11% | - C4E (Center for Enablement) Definition - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Core Concepts - Application Network Fundamentals |
| Topic 7: Managing APIs | 12% | - API Security (Policies, SLAs) - API Lifecycle Management - API Versioning |
| Topic 8: Applying Integration Patterns | 11% | - Integration Scenarios & Patterns - Batch Processing - Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) |
| Topic 9: Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations | 17% | - Platform Foundation Setup - Governance and Compliance Framework - IT Delivery & C4E Operating Model |
>> Mule-Arch-201 Braindumps Downloads <<
Our Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect prep torrent will provide customers with three different versions, including the PDF version, the software version and the online version, each of them has its own advantages. Now I am going to introduce you the PDF version of Mule-Arch-201 test braindumps which are very convenient. It is well known to us that the PDF version is very convenient and practical. The PDF version of our Mule-Arch-201 Test Braindumps provide demo for customers; you will have the right to download the demo for free if you choose to use the PDF version.
NEW QUESTION # 144
What best describes the Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs), also known as DNS entries, created when a Mule application is deployed to the CloudHub Shared Worker Cloud?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: The FQDNs are determined by the application name chosen, IRRESPECTIVE of the region
*****************************************
>> When deploying applications to Shared Worker Cloud, the FQDN are always determined by application name chosen.
>> It does NOT matter what region the app is being deployed to.
>> Although it is fact and true that the generated FQDN will have the region included in it (Ex: exp-salesorder-api.au-s1.cloudhub.io), it does NOT mean that the same name can be used when deploying to another CloudHub region.
>> Application name should be universally unique irrespective of Region and Organization and solely determines the FQDN for Shared Load Balancers.
NEW QUESTION # 145
Which of the following best fits the definition of API-led connectivity?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: API-led connectivity is not just an architecture or technology but also a way to organize people and processes for efficient IT delivery in the organization.
*****************************************
Reference:
NEW QUESTION # 146
A system API is deployed to a primary environment as well as to a disaster recovery (DR) environment, with different DNS names in each environment. A process API is a client to the system API and is being rate limited by the system API, with different limits in each of the environments. The system API's DR environment provides only 20% of the rate limiting offered by the primary environment. What is the best API fault-tolerant invocation strategy to reduce overall errors in the process API, given these conditions and constraints?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment; add timeout and retry logic to the process API to avoid intermittent failures; if it still fails, invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment
*****************************************
There is one important consideration to be noted in the question which is - System API in DR environment provides only 20% of the rate limiting offered by the primary environment. So, comparitively, very less calls will be allowed into the DR environment API opposed to its primary environment. With this in mind, lets analyse what is the right and best fault-tolerant invocation strategy.
1. Invoking both the system APIs in parallel is definitely NOT a feasible approach because of the 20% limitation we have on DR environment. Calling in parallel every time would easily and quickly exhaust the rate limits on DR environment and may not give chance to genuine intermittent error scenarios to let in during the time of need.
2. Another option given is suggesting to add timeout and retry logic to process API while invoking primary environment's system API. This is good so far. However, when all retries failed, the option is suggesting to invoke the copy of process API on DR environment which is not right or recommended. Only system API is the one to be considered for fallback and not the whole process API. Process APIs usually have lot of heavy orchestration calling many other APIs which we do not want to repeat again by calling DR's process API. So this option is NOT right.
3. One more option given is suggesting to add the retry (no timeout) logic to process API to directly retry on DR environment's system API instead of retrying the primary environment system API first. This is not at all a proper fallback. A proper fallback should occur only after all retries are performed and exhausted on Primary environment first. But here, the option is suggesting to directly retry fallback API on first failure itself without trying main API. So, this option is NOT right too.
This leaves us one option which is right and best fit.
- Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment
- Add Timeout and Retry logic on it in process API
- If it fails even after all retries, then invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment.
NEW QUESTION # 147
Refer to the exhibit. An organization needs to enable access to their customer data from both a mobile app and a web application, which each need access to common fields as well as certain unique fields.
The data is available partially in a database and partially in a 3rd-party CRM system.
What APIs should be created to best fit these design requirements?
A) A Process API that contains the data required by both the web and mobile apps, allowing these applications to invoke it directly and access the data they need thereby providing the flexibility to add more fields in the future without needing API changes B) One set of APIs (Experience API, Process API, and System API) for the web app, and another set for the mobile app C) Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system
D) A common Experience API used by both the web and mobile apps, but separate Process APIs for the web and mobile apps that interact with the database and the CRM System
Answer: A
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system
*****************************************
As per MuleSoft's API-led connectivity:
>> Experience APIs should be built as per each consumer needs and their experience.
>> Process APIs should contain all the orchestration logic to achieve the business functionality.
>> System APIs should be built for each backend system to unlock their data.
NEW QUESTION # 148
How are an API implementation, API client, and API consumer combined to invoke and process an API?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: The API consumer creates an API client, which sends API invocations to an API such that they are processed by an API implementation
*****************************************
Terminology:
>> API Client - It is a piece of code or program the is written to invoke an API
>> API Consumer - An owner/entity who owns the API Client. API Consumers write API clients.
>> API - The provider of the API functionality. Typically an API Instance on API Manager where they are managed and operated.
>> API Implementation - The actual piece of code written by API provider where the functionality of the API is implemented. Typically, these are Mule Applications running on Runtime Manager.
NEW QUESTION # 149
......
PassTorrent is a website to meet the needs of many customers. Some people who used our simulation test software to pass the IT certification exam to become a PassTorrent repeat customers. PassTorrent can provide the leading Salesforce training techniques to help you pass Salesforce Certification Mule-Arch-201 Exam.
Mule-Arch-201 Valid Exam Vce Free: https://www.passtorrent.com/Mule-Arch-201-latest-torrent.html
P.S. Free & New Mule-Arch-201 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassTorrent: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QCDrdEIuFO_Ehb5xUiz5aj7wByMHfyaw