BONUS!!! Download part of Pass4SureQuiz Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14DE2urTRF9YEmMa6veOYmNYFB8M4gR6X
The price for the Data-Engineer-Associate certification test's registration is somewhere around $100 to $1000. Thus, you would never risk your precious time and money. Pass4SureQuiz offers a demo version of the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice material which is totally free. You can try a free demo to make yourself more confident about the authenticity of the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) product. After buying the Data-Engineer-Associate material, you can instantly use it.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Store Management | 26% | - Optimize storage performance and cost - Select appropriate data storage solutions |
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Ingest and transform data using AWS services - Build and manage data pipelines |
| Topic 3: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Implement data security controls - Apply governance and compliance best practices |
| Topic 4: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor and maintain data pipelines - Troubleshoot data workflow issues |
>> Data-Engineer-Associate PDF Guide <<
For candidates who are going to attend the exam, the pass rate is quite important. Data-Engineer-Associate training materials of us are pass guaranteed, and if you can’t pass the exam one time, we are money back guaranteed. Besides Data-Engineer-Associate training materials are verified by skilled experts, therefore the quality and accuracy can be guaranteed, and you can use the Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps at ease. We also have online and offline chat service stuff, if any other questions, please contact us, we will give a reply to you as quickly as possible.
NEW QUESTION # 160
A company stores a large dataset in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer frequently runs complex queries on the dataset by using Amazon Athena. The data engineer needs to optimize query performance and optimize costs for queries that are run multiple times with the same parameters.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Amazon Athena charges per amount of data scanned by each query. When the same query with identical parameters is executed multiple times, re-scanning the data repeatedly increases both cost and execution time.
Athena provides query result reuse, which allows previously computed query results to be reused when an identical query is rerun within a configurable time window.
By enabling query result reuse at the Athena workgroup level, Athena automatically returns cached results instead of re-reading data from Amazon S3. This significantly improves query performance while reducing data scan costs. This feature is specifically designed for workloads where analysts frequently rerun complex queries with the same parameters, which directly matches the scenario.
Converting data to JSON would degrade performance because JSON is not a columnar format and increases scan size. Using Amazon EMR introduces unnecessary infrastructure management and cost for a query optimization problem that Athena already solves natively. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is intended for querying S3 data from within Redshift and does not address repeated-query optimization in Athena.
Therefore, configuring query result reuse in the Athena workgroup is the most cost-effective and operationally efficient solution.
NEW QUESTION # 161
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule.
Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity:
provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on- demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns. You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 162
A data engineer is building an automated extract, transform, and load (ETL) ingestion pipeline by using AWS Glue. The pipeline ingests compressed files that are in an Amazon S3 bucket. The ingestion pipeline must support incremental data processing.
Which AWS Glue feature should the data engineer use to meet this requirement?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Problem Analysis:
The pipeline processes compressed files in S3 and must support incremental data processing.
AWS Glue features must facilitate tracking progress to avoid reprocessing the same data.
Key Considerations:
Incremental data processing requires tracking which files or partitions have already been processed.
The solution must be automated and efficient for large-scale ETL jobs.
Solution Analysis:
Option A: Workflows
Workflows organize and orchestrate multiple Glue jobs but do not track progress for incremental data processing.
Option B: Triggers
Triggers initiate Glue jobs based on a schedule or events but do not track which data has been processed.
Option C: Job Bookmarks
Job bookmarks track the state of the data that has been processed, enabling incremental processing.
Automatically skip files or partitions that were previously processed in Glue jobs.
Option D: Classifiers
Classifiers determine the schema of incoming data but do not handle incremental processing.
Final Recommendation:
Job bookmarks are specifically designed to enable incremental data processing in AWS Glue ETL pipelines.
Reference:
AWS Glue Job Bookmarks Documentation
AWS Glue ETL Features
NEW QUESTION # 163
A company currently stores all of its data in Amazon S3 by using the S3 Standard storage class.
A data engineer examined data access patterns to identify trends. During the first 6 months, most data files are accessed several times each day. Between 6 months and 2 years, most data files are accessed once or twice each month. After 2 years, data files are accessed only once or twice each year.
The data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy to develop new data storage rules. The new storage solution must continue to provide high availability.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: D
Explanation:
To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.
Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a 12-hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.
Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.
Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.
Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone-IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.
Reference:
1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service
2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What's New with AWS
NEW QUESTION # 164
A media company wants to improve a system that recommends media content to customer based on user behavior and preferences. To improve the recommendation system, the company needs to incorporate insights from third-party datasets into the company's existing analytics platform.
The company wants to minimize the effort and time required to incorporate third-party datasets.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: A
Explanation:
AWS Data Exchange is a service that makes it easy to find, subscribe to, and use third-party data in the cloud.
It provides a secure and reliable way to access and integrate data from various sources, such as data providers, public datasets, or AWS services. Using AWS Data Exchange, you can browse and subscribe to data products that suit your needs, and then use API calls or the AWS Management Console to export the data to Amazon S3, where you can use it with your existing analytics platform. This solution minimizes the effort and time required to incorporate third-party datasets, as you do not need to set up and manage data pipelines, storage, or access controls. You also benefit from the data quality and freshness provided by the data providers, who can update their data products as frequently as needed12.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
* B. Use API calls to access and integrate third-party datasets from AWS. This option is vague and does not specify which AWS service or feature is used to access and integrate third-party datasets. AWS offers a variety of services and features that can help with data ingestion, processing, and analysis, but not all of them are suitable for the given scenario. For example, AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can help you discover, prepare, and combine data from various sources, but it requires you to create and run data extraction, transformation, and loading (ETL) jobs, which can add operational overhead3.
* C. Use Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to access and integrate third-party datasets from AWS CodeCommit repositories. This option is not feasible, as AWS CodeCommit is a source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories, not a data source that can be accessed by Amazon Kinesis Data Streams. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a service that enables you to capture, process, and analyze data streams in real time, such as clickstream data, application logs, or IoT telemetry. It does not support accessing and integrating data from AWS CodeCommit repositories, which are meant for storing and managing code, not data .
* D. Use Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to access and integrate third-party datasets from Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR). This option is also not feasible, as Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service that stores, manages, and deploys container images, not a data source that can be accessed by Amazon Kinesis Data Streams. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams does not support accessing and integrating data from Amazon ECR, which is meant for storing and managing container images, not data .
:
1: AWS Data Exchange User Guide
2: AWS Data Exchange FAQs
3: AWS Glue Developer Guide
4: AWS CodeCommit User Guide
5: Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Developer Guide
6: Amazon Elastic Container Registry User Guide
7: Build a Continuous Delivery Pipeline for Your Container Images with Amazon ECR as Source
NEW QUESTION # 165
......
Now you do not need to worry about the relevancy and top standard of Pass4SureQuiz AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam questions. These Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps are designed and verified by qualified AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam trainers. Now you can trust Pass4SureQuiz AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice questions and start preparation without wasting further time.
Exam Data-Engineer-Associate Demo: https://www.pass4surequiz.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-exam-quiz.html
What's more, part of that Pass4SureQuiz Data-Engineer-Associate dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14DE2urTRF9YEmMa6veOYmNYFB8M4gR6X