DOWNLOAD the newest PassTorrent JN0-352 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h3xCN1hY2zECXMpoDpnCz7vgHD2Dn8px
In the process of using our JN0-352 Study Materials if the clients encounter the difficulties, the obstacles and the doubts they could contact our online customer service staff in the whole day. If the clients fail in the test by accident we will refund them at once in the first moment. Our service team will update the JN0-352 study materials periodically and provide one-year free update. We only use the certificated experts and published authors to compile our study materials and our products boost the practice test software to test the clients’ ability to answer the questions. The clients can firstly be familiar with our products in detail and then make their decisions to buy it or not.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| BGP | 15-20% | - Route advertisement, attributes and path selection - Neighbor relationships and session establishment - Routing policies, filtering and common troubleshooting |
| IP Multicast | 5-10% | - IGMP operation and configuration - Multicast routing monitoring and troubleshooting - PIM Dense Mode, Sparse Mode and RP mechanisms |
| Tunnels and Overlays | 5-10% | - Overlay network design and connectivity - Tunnel types, encapsulation and operation - GRE, IP-IP and dynamic tunnel configuration |
| IS-IS | 10-15% | - Configuration and route exchange - Scalable enterprise deployment and troubleshooting - Adjacency establishment, levels and metrics |
| High Availability and Resiliency | 5-10% | - Network resiliency design and troubleshooting - Redundancy protocols and failover mechanisms - Graceful restart and non-stop routing |
| OSPF | 15-20% | - Neighbor formation, area design and LSA types - Configuration, verification and troubleshooting - Route summarization and redistribution |
| Protocol Independent Routing | 10-15% | - Routing instances and route selection criteria - Routing tables, static routes and route preference - Basic routing policy and filter operation |
| Layer 2 Security | 10-15% | - Port security, MAC limiting and storm control - DHCP snooping, Dynamic ARP Inspection and IP Source Guard - Layer 2 firewall filters and security features |
| Layer 2 Switching and VLANs | 15-20% | - Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) and Virtual Chassis - VLAN concepts, configuration, trunking and tagging - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP, RSTP, MSTP) operation and configuration |
When you know you will enjoy one year free update after purchase, you may consider how to get the latest Juniper JN0-352 exam torrent. Here, we will tell you, the PassTorrent system will send the update JN0-352 exam dumps to you automatically. You can pay attention to your payment email. If you find there is update and do not find any update email, do not worry, you can check your spam. If there is still not, please contact us by email or online chat. Besides, if you have any questions about Juniper JN0-352, please contact us at any time. Our 7/24 customer service will be always at your side and solve your problem at once.
NEW QUESTION # 94
Which two statements about redundant trunk groups on EX Series switches are correct? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Redundant trunk groups are designed to provide link redundancy. If the primary link fails, the secondary link will automatically take over to ensure continued connectivity.
In redundant trunk groups, while regular data traffic is sent over the primary link, Layer 2 control traffic (such as STP, LACP, etc.) is allowed on the secondary link to maintain network stability and protocol operations.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/multicast-l2/topics/topic-map/redundant-trunk-groups.html
NEW QUESTION # 95
You have configured the four EX Series switches with RSTP, as shown in the exhibit. You discover that whenever a link between switches goes up or down, the switches take longer than expected for RSTP to converge, using the default settings.
In this scenario, which action would solve the delay in RSTP convergence?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The exhibit shows the configuration of RSTP on EX-4, which has the command force-version stp.
This command forces the switch to use the legacy STP protocol instead of RSTP, even though the switch supports RSTP. This means that EX-4 will not be able to take advantage of the faster convergence and enhanced features of RSTP, such as edge ports, link type, and proposal/agreement sequence. The other switches in the network are likely to be running RSTP, as it is the default protocol for EX Series switches. Therefore, there will be a compatibility issue between EX-4 and the other switches, which will result in longer convergence times and suboptimal performance. The switch will also generate a warning message that says "Warning:
STP version mismatch with neighbor" when it receives a BPDU from a RSTP neighbor.
To solve this problem, the force-version command must be removed from EX-4, so that it can run RSTP natively and interoperate with the other switches in the network. This will enable faster convergence and better stability for the network topology. To remove the command, you can use the delete protocols rstp force-version command in configuration mode.
NEW QUESTION # 96
You want to enable redundancy for the EBGP peering between the two routers shown in the exhibit.
Which three actions will you perform in this scenario? (Choose three.)
Answer: B,D,E
Explanation:
A is correct because you need to configure BGP multihop to enable redundancy for the EBGP peering between the two routers. BGP multihop is a feature that allows BGP peers to establish a session over multiple hops, instead of requiring them to be directly connected. By default, EBGP peers use a time-to-live (TTL) value of 1 for their packets, which means that they can only reach adjacent neighbors. However, if you configure BGP multihop with a higher TTL value, you can allow EBGP peers to communicate over multiple routers in between. This can provide redundancy in case of a link failure or a router failure between the EBGP peers.
B is correct because you need to configure loopback interface peering to enable redundancy for the EBGP peering between the two routers. Loopback interface peering is a technique that uses loopback interfaces as the source and destination addresses for BGP sessions, instead of physical interfaces. Loopback interfaces are virtual interfaces that are always up and reachable as long as the router is operational. By using loopback interface peering, you can avoid the dependency on a single physical interface or link for the BGP session, and use multiple paths to reach the loopback address of the peer. This can provide redundancy and load balancing for the EBGP peering.
C is correct because you need to configure routes for the peer loopback interface IP addresses to enable redundancy for the EBGP peering between the two routers. Routes for the peer loopback interface IP addresses are necessary to ensure that the routers can reach each other's loopback addresses over multiple hops. You can use static routes or dynamic routing protocols to advertise and learn the routes for the peer loopback interface IP addresses. Without these routes, the routers will not be able to establish or maintain the BGP session using their loopback interfaces.
NEW QUESTION # 97
You are troubleshooting a Layer 2 topology issue in a campus network. The switches are running RSTP. You need to verify which switch is currently acting as the root bridge and identify the root port on the local device.
Which operational command should the administrator use to view this information?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The show spanning-tree bridge command is specifically designed to surface exactly the two pieces of information required in this scenario within a single output. Its Root ID field reports the full Bridge Identifier (priority and MAC address) of whichever switch has been elected root bridge for the spanning-tree instance in question, immediately answering which switch in the campus network is currently acting as root, regardless of whether that happens to be the local device or a remote one. In the same output, the command's Root port field explicitly names the specific local interface (for example, ge-0/0/1.0) that the local switch has selected as its path toward that root bridge, directly answering the second part of the requirement without needing to cross-reference a separate command. Together, these two fields give a complete, immediate picture of both root bridge identity and local root port selection from one operational command. show spanning-tree interface instead presents a per-interface breakdown of STP role (root, designated, alternate, backup) and state across all local ports, which can indirectly reveal the root port by looking for the 'Root' role, but it does not directly report the Root ID/root bridge identity in the same structured way that show spanning-tree bridge does. show ethernet-switching table and show ethernet-switching interface pertain entirely to MAC address learning and switching-specific interface configuration respectively, and neither surfaces any spanning-tree topology or root bridge information at all. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Switching - Spanning Tree Protocols, Verifying Root Bridge and Root Port with show spanning-tree bridge.
NEW QUESTION # 98
Click the Exhibit button. You run the show ospf database command and you see a Router LSA marked with an asterisk.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the significance of this result?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the output of show ospf database, Junos marks every self-originated link-state advertisement with an asterisk immediately preceding the LSA's link-state ID. A self-originated LSA is one that was created and flooded by the router on which the command is being executed, as opposed to an LSA that was received from and originated by a neighboring router elsewhere in the area. In this exhibit, the asterisked Router LSA has an ID of 10.101.100.0 and an Advertising Router value of the same 10.101.100.0, confirming that this particular Router LSA describes the local device's own links, area membership, and interface costs, and that the local router itself flooded this LSA into the area's link- state database. This distinction matters operationally because when troubleshooting OSPF topology or SPF calculation issues, engineers frequently need to isolate their own router's advertised state from the states advertised by every other router in the area; the asterisk provides an immediate, unambiguous visual cue for that separation without needing to cross-reference the router's own ID separately. It has no relationship to designated router or backup designated router status -- DR/BDR roles are indicated elsewhere in interface-level output, not through the asterisk convention in the LSA database dump, and a router that is neither DR nor BDR still self-originates and flags its own Router LSA the same way.
NEW QUESTION # 99
......
Juniper training pdf material is the valid tools which can help you prepare for the JN0-352 actual test. JN0-352 vce demo gives you the prep hints and important tips, helping you identify areas of weakness and improve both your conceptual knowledge and hands-on skills. With the help of JN0-352 study material, you will master the concepts and techniques that ensure you exam success. What’s more, you can receive JN0-352 updated study material within one year after purchase. Besides, you can rest assured to enjoy the secure shopping for Juniper exam dumps on our site, and your personal information will be protected by our policy.
Exam Dumps JN0-352 Zip: https://www.passtorrent.com/JN0-352-latest-torrent.html
What's more, part of that PassTorrent JN0-352 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h3xCN1hY2zECXMpoDpnCz7vgHD2Dn8px