Außerdem sind jetzt einige Teile dieser Fast2test Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos erhältlich: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NUHJ_oNknwCfUvzjTzFHjN9Jzefb-6sv
Fast2test ist nicht nur zuverlässig, sondern bietet auch erstklassigen Service. Wenn Sie die Prüfung nach dem Kauf der Plat-Arch-204 -Produkte nicht bestehen, versprechen wir Ihnen 100% eine volle Rückerstattung. Fast2test steht Ihnen auch einen einjährigen kostenlosen Update-Service zur Verfügung.
| Thema | Einzelheiten |
|---|---|
| Thema 1 |
|
| Thema 2 |
|
| Thema 3 |
|
>> Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsaufgaben <<
Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen aus Testfragen sowie Antworten, die von den erfahrenen IT-Experten aus Fast2test durch ihre Praxis und Erforschungen entworfen werden. Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung sind zur Zeit die genaueste auf dem Markt. Sie können die Demo auf der Webseite Fast2test.de herunterladen. Sie werden Ihr Helfer sein, während Sie sich auf die Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten.
84. Frage
A company captures orders and needs to send them to the Order fulfillment system. The user is not required to have confirmation from the Order fulfillment system. Which system constraint question should be considered when designing an integration to send orders from Salesforce to a fulfillment system?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
When designing an integration where the user does not require immediate confirmation, the architect is moving away from a synchronous "Request-Reply" pattern toward an asynchronous "Fire-and-Forget"16 or "Batch Processing" pattern. In such scenarios, the most critical architectural constraint is defining the latency requirements.
Latency dictates the technical choice of the integration tool. If the fulfillment system needs the order within seconds of creation to begin a high-speed picking process, the architect might choose Salesforce Outbound Messaging or an Apex Callout triggered by a Platform Event. If the system only needs to process orders once an hour or overnight, a Batch ETL process is more appropriate. Understanding the acceptable delay (latency) ensures that the solution meets business expectations without over-engineering for real-time performance where it isn't required.
While Option B (Outbound Messaging) is a valid technical capability, it is a specific solution rather than a high-level "system constraint question" that drives the initial design phase. Option C (Address Validation) is a functional requirement regarding data integrity, but it does not define the architectural framework of the integration as effectively as latency does. By identifying the latency threshold, the architect can determine if the integration should be near real-time, hourly, or daily, which in turn influences how the system handles error recovery, retries, and transaction volumes.
85. Frage
An enterprise customer is implementing Salesforce for Case Management. Based on the landscape (Email, Order Management, Data Warehouse, Case Management), what should the integration architect evaluate?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
The evaluation of an integration landscape is a process of rationalization. The goal is to identify which legacy systems Salesforce will replace (System Retirement) and which systems it must coexist with (Integration).
In this scenario, Salesforce is being implemented for Case Management. Salesforce Service Cloud is the industry leader for this specific function. Therefore, the legacy Case Management System should be retired. Any architecture that suggests "integrating" Salesforce with the legacy Case Management system (Options A and B) is creating a redundant and complex "dual-master" scenario that increases technical debt.
To provide a successful support experience, Salesforce needs to be the central "Engagement Layer," which requires integration with the remaining ecosystem:
Email Management System: To support "Email-to-Case" and ensure all customer communications are captured within the Salesforce Case record.
Order Management System (OMS): Support agents often need to verify purchase history or shipping status to resolve a case. A "Data Virtualization" or "Request-Reply" integration with the OMS is vital.
Data Warehouse: For long-term historical reporting and cross-functional analytics, Salesforce must push case data to the enterprise Data Warehouse.
By evaluating the integration with the Data Warehouse, Order Management, and Email Management systems, the architect ensures that Salesforce is enriched with the context it needs to resolve cases while simultaneously retiring the redundant legacy support system.
86. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters is creating a distributable Salesforce package. The package needs to call into a Custom Apex REST endpoint in the central org. The security team wants to ensure a specific integration account is used in the central org that they will authorize after installation. Which item should an architect recommend?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
When building a distributable package (likely a Managed Package) that must securely communicate back to a central "Hub" org, the architect must use a framework that supports OAuth 2.0 flows. Storing plain-text or even encrypted passwords (Option B) is a security violation and is brittle across different environments.
The architecturally sound solution is to leverage the Authentication Provider and Named Credentials framework. In the central org, a Connected App is created to act as the OAuth endpoint. In the package, an Authentication Provider is configured using the Consumer Key and Consumer Secret from that Connected App. This setup allows the administrator in the "Subscriber" org (the org where the package is installed) to initiate an OAuth flow.
When the security team "authorizes" the integration after installation, they are essentially completing the OAuth handshake. This grants the subscriber org an Access Token and a Refresh Token associated with the specific integration user in the central org. This mechanism ensures:
Credential Security: No passwords are ever stored in the code or metadata.
Centralized Control: The security team in the central org can revoke the Refresh Token at any time to kill the integration.
Scalability: The same package can be distributed to hundreds of orgs, each with its own unique, secure connection to the central Hub.
By using an Authentication Provider combined with a Named Credential, the Apex code in the package can simply call the endpoint by its developer name, and Salesforce handles the entire authentication header injection automatically, ensuring a robust and secure cross-org integration.
87. Frage
Salesforce users need to read data from an external system via an HTTP request. Which security methods should an integration architect leverage within Salesforce to secure the integration?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
To secure outbound HTTP requests from Salesforce, architects must implement defense-in-depth measures at both the authentication and transport layers.
Named Credentials are the primary architectural recommendation for managing callout endpoints and authentication in a secure, declarative manner. They abstract the endpoint URL and authentication parameters (such as usernames, passwords, or OAuth tokens) away from Apex code. This prevents sensitive credentials from being hardcoded or exposed in metadata, significantly reducing the risk of accidental disclosure. By using Named Credentials, Salesforce handles the heavy lifting of authentication headers automatically, ensuring that the integration is both secure and maintainable.
Two-way SSL (Mutual Authentication) provides an additional layer of security at the transport layer. While standard SSL ensures that Salesforce trusts the external server, Two-way SSL requires the external server to also verify the identity of the Salesforce client. The architect first generates a certificate in Salesforce, which is then presented to the external system during the TLS handshake. This "mutual trust" ensures that the external service only accepts requests from an authorized Salesforce instance, protecting against man-in-the-middle attacks and unauthorized access attempts.
While an Authorization Provider (Option C) is essential for OAuth-based flows, it is typically used within the configuration of a Named Credential rather than as a standalone security method for a generic HTTP request. By combining Named Credentials with Two-way SSL, the architect ensures that the integration is secured at both the session/authentication level and the network/transport level, adhering to enterprise security best practices for cloud-to-on-premise or cloud-to-cloud communication.
88. Frage
UC has an API-led architecture with three tiers. Requirement: return data to systems of engagement (mobile, web, Salesforce) in different formats and enforce different security protocols. What should the architect recommend?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
In a standard API-led connectivity model, the First Tier (Experience APIs) is responsible for tailoring data for specific systems of engagement.
The Experience APIs take the core data from the lower tiers and transform it into the specific return formats (e.g., JSON for mobile, XML for legacy web) and security protocols (e.g., OAuth for Salesforce, API Keys for web) required by each consumer. Option B correctly identifies that these transformations and security enforcements should happen at this outer layer. While an API Gateway (Option A) can provide generic security and rate limiting, it is the Experience API layer that provides the functional transformation and specific protocol requirements defined by the business needs of the engagement systems.
89. Frage
......
Es ist ganz normal, vor der Prüfung Angst zu haben, besonders vor der schwierig Prüfung wie Salesforce Plat-Arch-204. Wir wissen, dass allein mit der Ermutigung können Ihnen nicht selbstbewusst machen. Deshalb bieten wir die praktische Prüfungssoftware, um Ihnen zu helfen, Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 zu bestehen. Sie können zuerst die Demo der Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 gratis probieren. Wir glauben, dass Sie bestimmt unsere Bemühungen und Professionellsein von der Demo empfinden!
Plat-Arch-204 Deutsch Prüfung: https://de.fast2test.com/Plat-Arch-204-premium-file.html
2026 Die neuesten Fast2test Plat-Arch-204 PDF-Versionen Prüfungsfragen und Plat-Arch-204 Fragen und Antworten sind kostenlos verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NUHJ_oNknwCfUvzjTzFHjN9Jzefb-6sv