CheckPoint 156-590資格認定はバッジのような存在で、あなたの所有する専業技術と能力を上司に直ちに知られさせます。次のジョブプロモーション、プロジェクタとチャンスを申し込むとき、CheckPoint 156-590資格認定はライバルに先立つのを助け、あなたの大業を成し遂げられます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Threat Prevention Policy | 20% | - Applying Threat Prevention policy layers - Threat Prevention action settings - Profile-based vs. rule-based configurations - Creating and configuring Threat Prevention profiles |
| Threat Extraction | 10% | - Threat Extraction (Sanboxing) concepts - PDF, Office document, and archive sanitization - Threat Extraction policy configuration |
| IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) | 20% | - IPS signatures and protections - IPS logging and alerts - IPS exceptions and whitelisting - IPS policy configuration and tuning - IPS architecture and deployment modes |
| Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus | 15% | - Anti-Virus scanning methods (streamed vs. traditional) - Bot detection mechanisms - Configuring Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus policies - Bot and malware signature updates |
| Threat Emulation (SandBlast) | 15% | - File emulation process and verdicts - Threat Emulation policy configuration - Zero-day threat protection - Threat Emulation architecture and deployment |
| Threat Prevention Dashboard and Monitoring | 10% | - Using SmartConsole for monitoring - Threat Prevention statistics and trends - Threat Prevention logs and reporting - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues |
| Threat Prevention Overview and Architecture | 10% | - Security Gateway integration with Threat Prevention - Check Point Threat Prevention solution overview - Threat Prevention architecture and components |
現在の社会的背景と開発の見通しに基づいて、156-590認定は徐々に職場で最も際立つための前提条件として受け入れられています。 156-590試験資料は、夢をかなえるための試験ツールとしてご利用いただけます。 10年以上の努力により、156-590実践教材は業界で最も信頼性の高い製品になりました。 156-590試験問題には多くの利点があり、時間をかけて知ることができます。
質問 # 19
Which statement is true concerning the Custom Policy Tools?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is A. Block List files - Configure disallowed files . Custom Policy Tools are used to manage Threat Prevention objects and enforcement helpers under the Threat Prevention policy view. A Block List file is used to define files that should be treated as disallowed, blocked, or explicitly malicious/undesired according to the policy objective. This is the opposite of the Allow List, which Check Point documents as a list of trusted files that the Threat Prevention engine does not inspect for malware, viruses, and bots, helping reduce gateway resource utilization. The official guide shows Allow List Files under Threat Prevention > Custom Policy Tools > Allow List Files .
Option A is therefore the correct true statement because it accurately describes the role of block-list file handling. Option B sounds plausible but is not the tested correct statement in this question's answer key; the course item is specifically validating the Block List definition. Option C is incorrect because indicators are not "benign activity"; indicators usually represent observables such as IPs, domains, URLs, or hashes used for threat intelligence or enforcement. Option D is incorrect because profiles are not only available for Autonomous Threat Prevention; Custom Threat Prevention also uses profiles such as Basic, Optimized, and Strict. Reference topics: Custom Policy Tools, Block List Files, Allow List Files, Indicators, Threat Prevention Profiles.
質問 # 20
Which process is responsible for communication with the Check Point ThreatCloud for the sake of Anti-Virus Protection Update?
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is A. The CPAS Daemon (cpasd) . In the course-guide context, cpasd is the process associated with Anti-Virus communication toward Check Point ThreatCloud for protection-update and classification purposes. The functional reason is that Anti-Virus file inspection depends on Check Point's ThreatSpect and ThreatCloud intelligence pipeline. Check Point documentation explains that each Security Gateway has a Malware database and a local cache; when the cache has no answer, it queries the ThreatCloud repository. For Anti-Virus, the signature is sent for file classification.
The ThreatCloud network is dynamically updated and distributes attack information that can convert zero-day attack data into known signatures that Anti-Virus can block. This explains why the communication process matters: AV enforcement is not limited to a static local signature set; it relies on cloud-assisted reputation, classification, and continuously updated intelligence. The distractors do not match this function. RAD is mainly associated with resource categorization and URL/Application intelligence. pslavd is not the ThreatCloud update communication process named in this question. ted belongs to Threat Emulation, not Anti-Virus protection updates. Reference topics: Anti-Virus, CPAS/cpasd, ThreatCloud repository, Malware database, local cache, file classification.
質問 # 21
Task: Enable HTTPS inspection for Threat Prevention profile to scan encrypted content.
正解：
解説：
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Ensure HTTPS Inspection is enabled on gateway.
2- In the custom profile, enable Inspect HTTPS traffic under Anti-Virus and Anti-Bot.
3- Set CA certificate deployment for clients.
4- Save changes and install both TP and HTTPS inspection policies.
5- Validate detection using test HTTPS malware download.
質問 # 22
Task: Configure exceptions for Anti-Virus to ignore a known safe file hash.
正解：
解説：
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Open SmartConsole > Threat Prevention > Protections.
2- Go to "Anti-Virus" protections.
3- Create a new exception using file hash under "Files & Hashes."
4- Set action to "Ignore" or "Detect."
5- Save, apply to profile, publish, and install policy.
質問 # 23
At what point is the Anti-Bot blade enforced?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is B. Post-infection . Anti-Bot is the Threat Prevention blade focused on identifying and stopping bot-infected hosts after compromise indicators appear. Check Point documentation explicitly describes Anti-Bot as performing post-infection detection of bots on hosts and preventing bot damage by blocking command-and-control communications. The broader Threat Prevention guide also lists Anti-Bot as post-infection detection and explains that it uses ThreatCloud intelligence and multiple detection methods to identify bot activity.
This differs from IPS and Anti-Virus positioning. IPS and Anti-Virus are commonly understood as pre- infection controls because they attempt to block exploit traffic or malicious files before the host is compromised. Anti-Bot, by contrast, assumes the possibility that a host may already be infected and focuses on detecting outbound C & C communication, botnet behavior, malicious destinations, and other compromise evidence. Pre-inspection and post-inspection are not valid lifecycle categories for this blade in the exam context. In real operations, Anti-Bot is especially valuable for finding infected internal machines that bypassed earlier preventive controls or became infected off-network. Reference topics: Anti-Bot Software Blade, post-infection detection, Command and Control prevention, ThreatCloud intelligence, botnet behavior detection.
質問 # 24
......
インターネットでCheckPointの156-590問題集を探す人がたくさんいますが、どれが信頼できるか良く分からないです。ここで我々はCertJukenの156-590問題集を勧めたいです。我々は自分の商品に自信を持っていますから、以上の様々な承諾をします。我々の商品を利用する人から大好評を博すのは我々の156-590問題集の高質量と行き届いたサービスからです。
156-590コンポーネント: https://www.certjuken.com/156-590-exam.html