Hence, memorizing them will help you get prepared for the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization examination in a short time. The product of VerifiedDumps comes in PDF, desktop practice exam software, and MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) web-based practice test. To give you a complete understanding of these formats, we have discussed their features below.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Configuration management for optimization - Automated optimization features - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools |
| Topic 2: Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Network failure identification and resolution - Common performance issues diagnosis - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Root cause analysis methodologies - Optimization case studies |
| Topic 3: Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Interference analysis and mitigation - Coverage optimization methods - Load balancing techniques - Capacity optimization strategies - Parameter tuning best practices - Handover optimization |
| Topic 4: SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN solution components and functions - Single RAN integration principles |
| Topic 5: Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - KPI definition and measurement - Performance data collection and analysis - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Threshold configuration and alerting - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards |
>> SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Simulator Free <<
When purchasing the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization lesarning materials, one of the major questions you may concerns may be the quality of the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam dumps. Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning materials will provide you with the high quality of the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam dumps with the most professional specialists to edit SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Learning Materials, and the quality can be guaranteed. Besides, we also provide the free update for one year, namely you can get the latest version freely for 365 days.
NEW QUESTION # 23
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
NEW QUESTION # 24
In the context of mmWave deployments , what is the primary benefit of analog beamforming ?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A .
In mmWave systems, beamforming is essential because FR2 signals suffer from high path loss and blockage.
Analog beamforming uses fewer RF chains than fully digital beamforming, so it is cheaper and less complex in terms of RF hardware, power consumption, and implementation. Research and industry references explain that analog and hybrid beamforming architectures reduce the number of required ADCs/RF chains compared with fully digital beamforming, lowering cost and power complexity.
However, analog beamforming has limitations. It usually forms one beam, or a limited number of beams, at a time from a panel. Supporting multiple independent simultaneous beams and more UEs per sector is more associated with digital or hybrid beamforming, not pure analog beamforming.
Therefore, the primary benefit is:
Low cost and low complexity for coverage at higher mmWave bands.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Regarding the Vo5G / IMS voice and video over 5G feature, which statements are correct?
Answer: G
Explanation:
The correct answer is C: A, B, C, and D .
This question is about Vo5G / VoNR IMS service support in 5G SA. For IMS-based services over 5G, different QoS flows are used for signaling, voice media, and video media.
Statement A is correct.
The feature supports IMS voice and video over 5G in the gNB for FR1 , including both TDD and FDD deployments.
Statement B is correct.
IMS signaling commonly uses 5QI 5 . This QoS flow carries SIP/IMS signaling messages such as registration, session setup, modification, and release.
Statement C is correct.
IMS conversational voice uses 5QI 1 , which is the standardized GBR QoS identifier for conversational voice.
Statement D is correct.
IMS conversational video commonly uses 5QI 2 , which is associated with conversational video traffic.
NEW QUESTION # 26
When selecting an LTE anchor layer for EN-DC , why is it important to check 3GPP band combinations ?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In 5G NSA EN-DC , the UE connects to LTE as the Master Cell Group , or anchor, and NR as the Secondary Cell Group . Not every LTE band can be paired with every NR band. The supported LTE-NR combinations are defined by 3GPP band-combination rules and must also be supported by the UE chipset and device capability.
For example, an operator may have LTE Band 3, Band 7, or Band 20 and NR n78, but only certain LTE-NR combinations may be valid for EN-DC. If the selected LTE anchor band is not supported in combination with the NR band, the UE will not be able to establish EN-DC even if LTE and NR coverage both exist.
Option C is not correct because dual-uplink support depends on UE capability and specific band-combination support; it cannot be guaranteed for all UE models. Option A and D are unrelated to the main purpose of checking 3GPP band combinations.
So the correct reason is:
To ensure that LTE and NR bands are compatible and allowed as EN-DC pairs.
NEW QUESTION # 27
A slice supporting sensors and smart meters would be categorized as:
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is A .
Sensors and smart meters are typical massive IoT use cases. They usually involve a very large number of devices sending small amounts of data, often with low mobility and low power requirements.
This type of traffic fits mMTC , or massive Machine Type Communications .
Why the other options are not correct:
URLLC is used for very low-latency and highly reliable services, such as industrial automation, remote control, or mission-critical applications.
eMBB is used for high-throughput broadband services, such as video, fixed wireless access, or enhanced mobile internet.
DNN is not a slice category. It means Data Network Name and identifies the data network the UE connects to, similar to APN in LTE.
Therefore, a slice supporting sensors and smart meters is categorized as:
mMTC.
NEW QUESTION # 28
......
Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization training materials make it easier to prepare exam with a variety of high quality functions. We are committed to your achievements, so make sure you try preparation exam at a time to win. Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam prep is of reasonably great position from highly proficient helpers who have been devoted to their quality over ten years to figure your problems out. Their quality function of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning quiz is observably clear once you download them.
Real SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exams: https://www.verifieddumps.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-valid-exam-braindumps.html