さらに、Jpexam AgilePM-Practitionerダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uIgBMLNOaHP84aJ55PH8qKnoggNl3iNP
AgilePM-Practitioner準備資料は、資格認定の優れた支援者となります。 一度だけ試験をクリアできるように、世界中で高品質な認定AgilePM-Practitioner学習ガイドを提供することに集中しています。 AgilePM-Practitioner信頼性の高い試験ブートキャンプ資料には、PDFバージョン、ソフトテストエンジン、APPテストエンジンの3つの形式が含まれているため、当社の製品はさまざまな受験者の習慣を満たし、実際のAgilePM-Practitionerテストのほぼ完全な質問と回答をカバーします。
| Certification Vendor: | APMG International |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | APMG Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner Examination |
| Exam Number: | AgilePM-Practitioner |
| Related Certifications: | AgilePM Foundation AgilePM Practitioner |
| Real Exam Qty: | 4 scenario-based questions (objective testing format with multiple sub-questions) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Price: | Varies by region and training provider (typically ~£250–£350 GBP) |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 50% (typically 40/80 marks) |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-part questions, Scenario-based objective testing, Closed book |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 5 years (subject to APMG certification renewal policy) |
| Recommended Training: | DSDM Agile Project Management Guidance APMG Accredited AgilePM Training Providers |
| Exam Registration: | APMG International AgilePM Page APMG Candidate Portal / Exam Booking |
| Sample Questions: | APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or accredited test centre exam |
| Pre Condition: | APMG AgilePM Foundation certification is recommended or required before sitting the Practitioner exam (varies by provider and training route). |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://apmg-international.com/product/agilepm |
>> AgilePM-Practitioner出題範囲 <<
当社Jpexamは、常にAgilePM-Practitioner認定の傾向を追ってきました。当社の研究開発チームは、AgilePM-Practitioner試験で出題される質問を調査するだけではありません。 AgilePM-Practitioner練習資料の内容は、試験のすべての質問が含まれるように慎重に選択されています。そして、私たちの教材には、いつでも、どこでも、読む、Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner Examテストする、勉強するのに役立つ3つの形式があります。つまり、当社の製品を使用すると、試験の準備を効率的に行うことができます。 AgilePM-Practitioner認定を希望される場合、当社APMG-Internationalの製品が最適です。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 125
A
* Explanation: Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason explains the assertion.
Kotter's model identifies celebrating early wins as a critical step to sustain momentum and mitigate resistance.
Assertion 4:
The CEO's openness will help to make the vision more 'sellable' to the 'volunteer army' when
'communicating the vision and the strategy'.Reason:It is important to institutionalize the strategic changes into the culture so that implementation of the vision becomes second nature to staff.
正解：
解説：
B
* Explanation: Both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason does not directly explain the assertion. The CEO's openness is more about inspiring and aligning the volunteer army, while institutionalizing change into culture is a separate step in Kotter's model.
Final Answer Table
Assertion Line
Answer
1
A
2
A
3
A
4
B
質問 # 126
A difference of opinion on the outcome of an earlier project has created a
'them and us' culture between the Sales Department and the Operations
Department.
What action should the Project Manager take to resolve this?
正解：D
解説：
The most effective action the Project Manager should take to resolve the 'them and us' culture between the Sales Department and the Operations Department is:
B: Brief the team and the Business Visionary on the use of an Agile Project Management approach and the requirement to collaborate.
Addressing the cultural divide requires fostering an environment of collaboration and mutual respect. By educating all team members and the Business Visionary about Agile Project Management principles, which emphasize teamwork, collaboration, and collective ownership of project outcomes, the Project Manager can help shift the team's mindset towards a more unified approach. This briefing should highlight the value of diverse perspectives and the importance of working together towards common goals, thus addressing the underlying issues contributing to the 'them and us' culture. Encouraging open communication and collaboration as fundamental components of the Agile approach can help break down barriers and build a more cohesive team.
質問 # 127
Answer the following question about how risks will be reduced on the Hoy Hall Hotel project through successful application of the DSDM Principles.
Column 1 lists a selection of project risks identified on the Hoy Hall Hotel project. Column 2 is a list of the DSDM Principles. For each risk in Column 1, select from Column
2 the DSDM Principle which, if applied appropriately, would MOST help to reduce or mitigate that risk.
Each selection from Column 2 can be used once, more than once or not at all.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Here are the DSDM Principles that would most help to reduce or mitigate the listed risks:
* The 'Hoy for Hoy Hall' Action Group may cause delay to the project if they are not kept updated on how the finished rooms are going to look.
* G. Communicate continuously and clearly
* Timber Tigers will ensure that the front rooms are finished and approved by the end of Timebox A.
* E. Build incrementally from firm foundations
* The Architecture Angels IT support team may require more detail up front in order to approve the initial design for the new online reservation system.
* A. Focus on the business need
* The morale of the Solution Development Team may be adversely affected if the external web design specialist is not a team player.
* C. Collaborate
* Empowering the Solution Development Team to manage themselves on a day-to-day basis may result in the Project Manager losing sight of what activities are being carried out, by whom and when.
* H. Demonstrate control
質問 # 128
Review sessions have been scheduled at end of Investigation, Refinement and Consolidation for the later Timeboxes to ensure that the mistakes made in Timebox A do not happen again.
Which Agile principle MOST influences this course of action?
正解：B
解説：
Topic 1, Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project
Scenario:
Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project
(Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.
After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.
Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this.
To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.
Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.
In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.
Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good
relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.
A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive.
This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A
Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.
The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for
Steering the project.
The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.
Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.
The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment.
All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.
Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.
質問 # 129
Using the project timeline given in the Project Scenario, answer the following question about application of Timeboxing on the Hoy Hall project.
Lines 1 to 5 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies.
Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.
Assertion :
1. All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.
BECAUSE
The Investigation step within each Structured Timebox requires everyone working within the team to jointly agree how the requirements of the Timebox will be met.
2. Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off BECAUSE The aim of the Investigation step within each Timebox is to complete as much of the development work as possible.
3. It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.
BECAUSE
Each Timebox should comprise an Evolutionary Development phase and
Deployment phase.
4. It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.
BECAUSE
A typical Timebox Plan should provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment.
5. It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.
Reason
BECAUSE
The Solution Development Team is responsible for planning the detail of all the work of each Timebox.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
For each line, here is the appropriate option from A to E that applies:
* All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.
* E. False (Assertion) False (Reason)
* Rationale: It is not practical or in line with Agile principles to consolidate all internal works into one Structured Timebox, as the work will likely need to be spread over multiple Timeboxes.
Additionally, the Investigation step involves agreeing on how to meet the requirements of the Timebox, not necessarily consolidating all work into one.
* Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off
* B. True (Assertion) True (Reason) BUT the reason does not explain the assertion
* Rationale: While it is true that acceptance criteria should be agreed upon during the Timebox Kick-Off, the reason given is incorrect because the aim of the Investigation step is not necessarily to complete as much development work as possible but to plan and understand the work that will be carried out.
* It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.
* A. True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion
* Rationale: Each Timebox should indeed include both Evolutionary Development and a Deployment phase. This assertion and reason correctly align with the concept of Timeboxing in Agile.
* It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.
* A. True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion
* Rationale: The typical Timebox Plan does provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment, which would include planning for deployment.
* It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.
* C. True (Assertion) False (Reason)
* Rationale: While it is true that Earth Excavations should create a detailed plan for their activities in Timebox C, the reason is incorrect as the Solution Development Team is not solely responsible for planning all work details within a Timebox. This task would typically be a collaborative effort involving all relevant parties.
質問 # 130
......
AgilePM-Practitioner復習解答例: https://www.jpexam.com/AgilePM-Practitioner_exam.html
P.S. JpexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいAgilePM-Practitionerダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uIgBMLNOaHP84aJ55PH8qKnoggNl3iNP