ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor최신업데이트버전덤프문제공부 & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험덤프데모

KoreaDumps ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fQTUOx-UBhedGF98Tj2l-rlN3ET0cTlN

KoreaDumps에는 베터랑의전문가들로 이루어진 연구팀이 잇습니다, 그들은 it지식과 풍부한 경험으로 여러 가지 여러분이PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험을 패스할 수 있을 자료 등을 만들었습니다, KoreaDumps 에서는 일년무료 업뎃을 제공하며, KoreaDumps 의 덤프들은 모두 높은 정확도를 자랑합니다. KoreaDumps 선택함으로 여러분이PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에 대한 부담은 사라질 것입니다.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험을 응시하려면, 지원자는 최소 5년간 정보 보안 관리 경험이 있어야 하며, 이 중 최소 2년간의 감사 경험이 있어야 합니다. 또한, 지원자는 PECB에서 인정하는 리드 감사자 교육 과정을 이수하거나 동등한 지식을 보유하고 있어야 합니다. 시험은 2부분으로 구성되어 있으며, 필기 시험과 실기 시험이 있습니다. 필기 시험은 150문항의 객관식 문제로 이루어진 3시간의 폐쇄형 시험입니다. 반면, 실기 시험은 4개의 케이스 스터디로 이루어져 있으며, 지원자는 ISMS 감사 팀을 이끌며 자신의 지식과 기술을 적용해야 하는 2시간의 폐쇄형 시험입니다.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor최신 업데이트버전 덤프문제공부 <<

최신 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor최신 업데이트버전 덤프문제공부 시험덤프공부

KoreaDumps에서 출시한 PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 덤프는 시험문제점유율이 가장 높은 시험대비자료입니다. 실제PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험문제유형과 같은 형식으로 제작된PECB인증ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험공부자료로서KoreaDumps덤프의 실용가치를 자랑하고 있습니다.덤프를 공부하여 시험불합격하시면 덤프비용은 환불처리해드립니다.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 자격증은 정보 보안 분야에서 ISMS의 인증 리드 감사자가 되고자 하는 전문가나 감사 역량을 향상시키고자 하는 전문가들을 위한 자격증입니다. 이 자격증 시험은 정보 보안 관리의 원칙과 실천, ISO/IEC 27001 표준 및 감사 프로세스와 관련된 다양한 주제를 다룹니다. 시험에 통과한 후보자는 ISMS의 효과적인 감사를 수행하고 개선을 위한 권장 사항을 제공할 수 있게 됩니다.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 인증은 ISO/IEC 27001 표준에 대한 인증 리드 감사자가 되기를 목표로 하는 전문가들을 대상으로 고안되었습니다. 이 인증 시험은 정보 보안, IT 거버넌스 및 품질 관리를 비롯한 다양한 분야에서 전문 인증 및 교육 과정을 제공하는 글로벌 프로페셔널 인증 및 교육 공급자인 PECB에서 제공됩니다.

최신 ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 무료샘플문제 (Q25-Q30):

질문 # 25
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations, including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment's top management to understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment's representatives stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment's operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to control employees' access rights. Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities. The procedures of the company stated that "Logs recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed," yet the company did not present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation for certification.
During stage 1 audit, the audit team found out that Sinvestment did not have records on information security training and awareness. What Sinvestment do in this case? Refer to scenario 6.

정답:A

설명:
Sinvestment should correct the identified issue related to the lack of documentation on information security training and awareness before the stage 2 audit. Addressing this gap promptly ensures that the ISMS is fully compliant and effective when assessed in the subsequent audit stage.


질문 # 26
Select a word from the following options that best completes the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

정답:

설명:

Explanation

The purpose of a management system audit is to evaluate the performance of an organization's management system.
A management system audit is an independent and systematic analysis and evaluation of a company's overall activities and performances1. It is a valuable tool used to determine the efficiency, functions, accomplishments and achievements of the company1. A management system audit can be conducted against a range of audit criteria, including (but not limited to) requirements set of in existing ISO standards2.
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, the purpose of an audit is to enable the auditor to provide an audit conclusion that is related to the audit objectives2. The audit objectives are defined by the audit client and may include determining the extent of conformity or nonconformity of the audited management system against the audit criteria, evaluating the ability of the audited management system to ensure that the organization meets applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, identifying potential improvement opportunities for the audited management system, and facilitating continual improvement of the audited management system2.
Therefore, the correct answer is evaluate, as it best describes the purpose of a management system audit. The other options are not correct because they are not specific enough or do not reflect the intended outcome of an audit. For example, improve implies that the audit itself will enhance the performance of the management system, which is not necessarily true. Manage implies that the audit will control or direct the management system, which is not its role. Research implies that the audit will generate new knowledge or information about the management system, which is not its primary aim.


질문 # 27
Scenario 7: Webvue. headquartered in Japan, is a technology company specializing in the development, support, and maintenance of computer software. Webvue provides solutions across various technology fields and business sectors. Its flagship service is CloudWebvue, a comprehensive cloud computing platform offering storage, networking, and virtual computing services. Designed for both businesses and individual users. CloudWebvue is known for its flexibility, scalability, and reliability.
Webvue has decided to only include CloudWebvue in its ISO/IEC 27001 certification scope. Thus, the stage 1 and 2 audits were performed simultaneously Webvue takes pride in its strictness regarding asset confidentiality They protect the information stored in CloudWebvue by using appropriate cryptographic controls. Every piece of information of any classification level, whether for internal use. restricted, or confidential, is first encrypted with a unique corresponding hash and then stored in the cloud The audit team comprised five persons Keith. Sean. Layla, Sam. and Tin a. Keith, the most experienced auditor on the IT and information security auditing team, was the audit team leader. His responsibilities included planning the audit and managing the audit team. Sean and Layla were experienced in project planning, business analysis, and IT systems (hardware and application) Their tasks included audit planning according to Webvue's internal systems and processes Sam and Tina, on the other hand, who had recently completed their education, were responsible for completing the day-to-day tasks while developing their audit skills While verifying conformity to control 8.24 Use of cryptography of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A through interviews with the relevant staff, the audit team found out that the cryptographic keys have been initially generated based on random bit generator (RBG) and other best practices for the generation of the cryptographic keys. After checking Webvue's cryptography policy, they concluded that the information obtained by the interviews was true. However, the cryptographic keys are still in use because the policy does not address the use and lifetime of cryptographic keys.
As later agreed upon between Webvue and the certification body, the audit team opted to conduct a virtual audit specifically focused on verifying conformity to control 8.11 Data Masking of ISO/IEC 27001 within Webvue, aligning with the certification scope and audit objectives. They examined the processes involved in protecting data within CloudWebvue. focusing on how the company adhered to its policies and regulatory standards. As part of this process. Keith, the audit team leader, took screenshot copies of relevant documents and cryptographic key management procedures to document and analyze the effectiveness of Webvue's practices.
Webvue uses generated test data for testing purposes. However, as determined by both the interview with the manager of the QA Department and the procedures used by this department, sometimes live system data are used. In such scenarios, large amounts of data are generated while producing more accurate results. The test data is protected and controlled, as verified by the simulation of the encryption process performed by Webvue's personnel during the audit While interviewing the manager of the QA Department, Keith observed that employees in the Security Training Department were not following proper procedures, even though this department fell outside the audit scope. Despite the exclusion in the audit scope, the non conformity in the Security Training Department has potential implications for the processes within the audit scope, specifically impacting data security and cryptographic practices in CloudWebvue. Therefore, Keith incorporated this finding into the audit report and accordingly informed the auditee.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on Scenario 7, was Keith's choice regarding the incorporation of the Security Training Department in the audit report appropriate?

정답:B

설명:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct Answer:
ISO 19011:2018 allows auditors to report significant issues that impact the audit scope, even if they arise outside the predefined scope.
Security Training Department nonconformities directly affected CloudWebvue's ISMS, justifying its inclusion in the audit report.
B . Incorrect:
Transparency is crucial in audits, and Keith correctly informed the auditee before reporting.
C . Incorrect:
Issues affecting ISMS implementation must be reported, as they pose risks to the certification scope.
Relevant Standard Reference:


질문 # 28
Select a word from the following options that best completes the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

정답:

설명:

Explanation:

The purpose of a management system audit is to evaluate the performance of an organization's management system.
A management system audit is an independent and systematic analysis and evaluation of a company's overall activities and performances1. It is a valuable tool used to determine the efficiency, functions, accomplishments and achievements of the company1. A management system audit can be conducted against a range of audit criteria, including (but not limited to) requirements set of in existing ISO standards2.
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, the purpose of an audit is to enable the auditor to provide an audit conclusion that is related to the audit objectives2. The audit objectives are defined by the audit client and may include determining the extent of conformity or nonconformity of the audited management system against the audit criteria, evaluating the ability of the audited management system to ensure that the organization meets applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, identifying potential improvement opportunities for the audited management system, and facilitating continual improvement of the audited management system2.
Therefore, the correct answer is evaluate, as it best describes the purpose of a management system audit. The other options are not correct because they are not specific enough or do not reflect the intended outcome of an audit. For example, improve implies that the audit itself will enhance the performance of the management system, which is not necessarily true. Manage implies that the audit will control or direct the management system, which is not its role. Research implies that the audit will generate new knowledge or information about the management system, which is not its primary aim.


질문 # 29
You are conducting a third-party surveillance audit when another member of the audit team approaches you seeking clarification. They have been asked to assess the organisation's application of control 5.7 - Threat Intelligence. They are aware that this is one of the new controls introduced in the 2022 edition of ISO/IEC
27001, and they want to make sure they audit the control correctly.
They have prepared a checklist to assist them with their audit and want you to confirm that their planned activities are aligned with the control's requirements.
Which three of the following options represent valid audit trails?

정답:A,C,D

설명:
These three options represent valid audit trails for control 5.7, as they are aligned with the control's requirements and objectives. According to the web search results from my predefined tool, control 5.7 requires organisations to collect and analyse information relating to information security threats and use that information to take mitigation actions12. The control also specifies that threat intelligence should be relevant, perceptive, contextual, and actionable, and that it should be used to prevent, detect, or respond to threats34.
Therefore, the auditor should verify how the organisation collects, analyses, and produces threat intelligence, how it uses threat intelligence to protect its information assets, and how it monitors and evaluates the effectiveness of its threat intelligence arrangements. The other options are not valid audit trails, as they are either irrelevant, incorrect, or incomplete. For example:
*The task of producing threat intelligence is not assigned to the organisation's internal audit team, but to the person or team responsible for the ISMS, such as the information security manager or the information security committee5 .
*The organisation's risk assessment process does not begin with effective threat intelligence, but with the identification of the context, scope, and objectives of the ISMS . Threat intelligence is an input for the risk identification and analysis, but not the starting point of the risk assessment process.
*Speaking to top management to make sure all staff are aware of the importance of reporting threats is not sufficient to audit the control, as it does not address how the organisation collects, analyses, and produces threat intelligence, nor how it uses it to take mitigation actions. The auditor should also speak to the staff involved in the threat intelligence process, and review the relevant documents and records.
*Checking that the organisation has a fully documented threat intelligence process is not enough to audit the control, as it does not verify the implementation and effectiveness of the process. The auditor should also observe the process in action, and examine the outputs and outcomes of the process.
*Determining whether internal and external sources of information are used in the production of threat intelligence is a partial audit trail, as it only covers one aspect of the control. The auditor should also assess the quality, reliability, and relevance of the sources, and how the information is analysed and used.
References: = 1: ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 5.7 - Threat Intelligence - ISMS.online12: ISO 27001 Annex A
5.7 Threat Intelligence - High Table23: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques
- Information security management systems - Requirements, clause A.5.74: ISO 27002 Emphasizes Need For Threat Intelligence - Rapid745: ISO/IEC 27007:2011 Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for information security management systems auditing, clause 6.3.2. : ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability [Updated 2024] - Sprinto3 : ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 6.1.1. : ISO 27001 Requirement 6.1.1 - Actions to address risks and opportunities | ISMS.online1


질문 # 30
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험덤프데모: https://www.koreadumps.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_exam-braindumps.html

BONUS!!! KoreaDumps ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fQTUOx-UBhedGF98Tj2l-rlN3ET0cTlN