無料でクラウドストレージから最新のCertJuken Platform-App-Builder PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PiJR8JqTn22wK6mm5OdQZt0DWNgxpieh
変化する地域に対応するには、問題を解決する効率を改善する必要があります。これは、試験に対処するだけでなく、多くの側面を反映しています。 Platform-App-Builder実践教材は、あなたがそれを実現するのに役立ちます。これらの時間に敏感な試験の受験者にとって、重要なニュースで構成される高効率のPlatform-App-Builder実際のテストは、最高の助けになります。定期的にそれらを練習することによってのみ、あなたはあなたに明らかな進歩が起こったのを見るでしょう。
Salesforce Platform-App-Builder（Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder）認定試験は、Salesforce Platformを使用してカスタムアプリケーションを設計、構築、展開する専門家の能力を証明するために設計されています。この認定試験は、Salesforce Platform上でアプリケーションを開発した経験がある個人が、自分のスキルと知識を検証したい場合に最適です。試験は、データモデリング、セキュリティ、ユーザーインターフェイスデザイン、ビジネスロジック、自動化など、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。認定試験は、組織のビジネス要件を満たすカスタムアプリケーションを設計、構築、展開する候補者の能力をテストすることを意図しています。
Salesforce Platform-App-Builder認定試験は、Salesforceプラットフォームの経験があり、知識とスキルセットを拡大しようとしている個人を対象としています。この試験では、データモデリングと管理、セキュリティ、ユーザーインターフェイス、自動化、ビジネスロジックなど、さまざまなトピックについて説明します。この試験は、60の複数選択の質問で構成されており、105分の時間制限があります。
>> Platform-App-Builder日本語版復習指南 <<
製品がどれほど優れていても、ユーザーは使用過程でいくつかの難しい問題に遭遇します。 Platform-App-Builderの実際の試験資料も例外ではありません。最高の製品体験を楽しむために、ユーザーが使用中のプロセスで問題が見つかった場合は、Platform-App-Builderを初めてチェックして、試験問題のパフォーマンス、ユーザーが問題を解決するのに役立つ専門のメンテナンススタッフ。 Platform-App-Builderラーニングリファレンスファイルには、効率の良い製品メンテナンスチームがあり、数分でPlatform-App-Builder試験の質問を送信できます。
Salesforceは、あらゆる規模のビジネスに幅広い顧客関係管理（CRM）ツールを提供するクラウドベースのソフトウェア会社です。 Salesforceプラットフォームの重要な機能の1つは、Salesforce Platform-App-Builderを使用してカスタムアプリを構築できることです。このツールを使用すると、開発者と非技術的なユーザーも同様に、従業員や顧客が外部的に使用できるカスタムアプリを作成できます。
質問 # 32
An app builder has a custom component they want to make available on the utility bar, but the component is unavailable.
How should the component be tagged?
正解：C
解説：
To make a custom component available for the utility bar in Salesforce, the component needs to be explicitly tagged for use in the utility bar. Salesforce components require specific configurations to be available in different parts of the application, such as the utility bar, record pages, or app pages.
* Option C: For use on the utility bar: When a custom Lightning component is developed, it must include a specific target tag in its .js-meta.xml configuration file that marks it as usable in the utility bar. This is done by setting the target to "lightning__UtilityBar". Without this tag, the component will not appear as an option to add to the utility bar in the App Manager.
* Example of how the component is tagged in the meta.xml file:
xml
Copy code
<targets>
<target>lightning__UtilityBar</target>
</targets>
質問 # 33
Universal Containers has a requirement that an email notification needs to be sent to an Account owner automatically 5 days before a related Contract ' s end date.
Which flow type and element combination should the Platform App Builder use?
正解：D
解説：
A schedule-triggered flow is appropriate when Salesforce must periodically identify records approaching a date and perform an automated action. Salesforce documents schedule-triggered flows as automation that runs at a specified time and frequency for batches of records. A daily scheduled flow can use Get Records to identify Contracts whose End Date is five days away, obtain the related Account information, and invoke Send Email for the Account owner. Salesforce provides the same architectural pattern for expiration reminders, where a daily schedule-triggered flow checks records and sends notifications a specified number of days before expiration. Screen Flow requires user interaction, while an autolaunched flow does not independently provide the required recurring schedule.
質問 # 34
DreamHouse Realty wants to import its property records from an external system into Salesforce. The app builder will use an external ID field to house the property ID from the external system. Which two details should the app builder know when using external ID fields?
正解：A、B
解説：
Treat the requirement as something users will depend on daily. The proper configuration is B. Each object can have up to 25 custom external ID fields.; D. An external ID field can be an auto-number field. In Salesforce terms, this is a data import and matching issue. Salesforce import tools differ by data volume, matching logic, and operation. Data Import Wizard is guided and duplicate-aware for supported objects; Data Loader is stronger for larger updates, upserts, and clearing values.
The selected configuration is the professional answer because it is native, declarative, and placed at the right scope. If the requirement later expands, another administrator can inspect the same metadata area and understand how the behavior is being produced. That is far better than a solution that depends on hidden assumptions or user training.
The rejected choices solve different problems. A (Each org can have up to 25 custom external ID fields.) is less defensible because it is not the most maintainable declarative control for this design. C (An external ID field can be a URL field.) would be fragile here because it could produce an inconsistent result once different users, records, or apps are tested. The configuration remains understandable for future admins because the decision is visible in metadata rather than buried in a workaround.
---
質問 # 35
An app builder at DreamHouse Realty created a custom object which has Fields containing data from two different objects via related lookups. What is needed to create " with " or " without " reports on the new custom Object?
正解：D
解説：
Treat the requirement as something users will depend on daily. Custom report types define reportable object relationships, including whether the report includes only matching child records or parent records with and without children. The proper configuration is D. Custom Report Type. This is the option that best matches the Salesforce responsibility being tested under Data Modeling and Management.
A practical administrator would confirm the object context, the user action, and whether the result must be stored, calculated, displayed, automated, approved, or deployed. Here the selected answer is the one that acts at the correct point in that chain. It keeps the configuration declarative and avoids inventing a process around a problem that Salesforce already has a native feature to solve.
The rejected choices solve different problems. A (Report Filters) is less defensible because Reporting configuration helps analysis, but it does not enforce the requested record behavior. B (Row-Level Formula) should be rejected because A formula is calculated display logic and cannot always store static values or perform record updates. C (Report Bucket Field) would be fragile here because Reporting configuration helps analysis, but it does not enforce the requested record behavior. The configuration remains understandable for future admins because the decision is visible in metadata rather than buried in a workaround.
---
質問 # 36
The Director of Customer Services wants to know when agents are overwhelmed with high-priority items in the support queue. The Director wants to receive a notification when a new case is open with the status of "New" for more than four business hours.
Which two automation processes should be used to accomplish this? (Choose two.)
正解：B、C
質問 # 37
......
Platform-App-Builder専門知識: https://www.certjuken.com/Platform-App-Builder-exam.html
P.S.CertJukenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 Salesforce Platform-App-Builderダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PiJR8JqTn22wK6mm5OdQZt0DWNgxpieh