Certification ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions - Examinations ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Actual Questions

DOWNLOAD the newest Actual4Dumps ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EJSmEh1e-J_uBG-sj6DzBYoTdYqy_502

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor dumps at Actual4Dumps are always kept up to date. Every addition or subtraction of ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam questions in the exam syllabus is updated in our braindumps instantly. Practice on real ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and we have provided their answers too for your convenience. If you put just a bit of extra effort, you can score the highest possible score in the real ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam because our ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Preparation dumps are designed for the best results. Start learning the futuristic way. ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam practice software allows you to practice on real ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor questions. The ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Practice Exam consists of multiple practice modes, with practice history records and self-assessment reports. You can customize the practice environment to suit your learning objectives.

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:PECB
Exam Name:PECB Certified ISO 9001 Lead Auditor
Exam Number:ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor
Exam Duration:180 minutes
Available Languages:English
Real Exam Qty:80
Exam Price:USD 1000
Passing Score:70%
Certificate Validity Period:3 Years
Related Certifications:PECB Master in Quality Management
PECB Certified ISO 9001 Lead Implementer
Exam Format:Open Book, Multiple Choice
Sample Questions:PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions
Exam Way:Online (PECB Exams application) or Paper-based (at training centers)
Pre Condition:None (Recommended: Training course and experience in Quality Management)
Official Syllabus URL:https://pecb.com/en/education-and-certification-for-individuals/iso-9001-lead-auditor

>> Certification ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions <<

User Friendly Actual4Dumps ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Practice Test Software

Our ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor practice braindumps not only apply to students, but also apply to office workers; not only apply to veterans in the workplace, but also apply to newly recruited newcomers. And our ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor study materials use a very simple and understandable language, to ensure that all people can learn and understand. Besides, our ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Real Exam also allows you to avoid the boring of textbook reading, but let you master all the important knowledge in the process of doing exercises.

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of a quality management system: The main objective of this domain is to evaluate your skills of explaining and applying ISO 9001 principles and concepts.
Topic 2
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: Questions about interpreting and applying the main concepts and principles related to a QMS audit appear in this topic.
Topic 3
  • Managing an ISO 9001 audit program: This topic evaluates your abilities to establish and managing a QMS audit program.
Topic 4
  • Conducting an ISO 9001 audit: It evaluates your skills to conduct a QMS audit.
Topic 5
  • Preparing an ISO 9001 audit: This topic covers sub-topics related to preparing a quality management system audit.
Topic 6
  • Closing an ISO 9001 audit: The topic focuses on concluding a QMS audit and conducting audit follow-up activities.

PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q98-Q103):

NEW QUESTION # 98
Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.
Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled.
The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.
The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team.
Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.
Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Scenario 7 states that Sean planned audit activities on his own. Is this acceptable?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.2.2 (Audit Planning):
* The audit team leader is responsible for planning the audit and assigning roles.
* Top management (A) does not plan the audit, but they provide resources.
* While team members may provide input, the leader has the final authority.
Thus, B is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.2.2 (Audit Planning)


NEW QUESTION # 99
You are conducting an ISO 9001 audit of a Materials Recycling Facility (MRF). The organisation processes waste plastics into raw materials for plastic bottle manufacturers. You reach the manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products, such as plastic bags, plastic film and badly contaminated items that would compromise the recycling process. You interview the line supervisor.
You: "Why are these plastic items being rejected at this stage?"
Auditee: "They do not meet our processing standards."
You: "What is the reason for that?"
Auditee: "These items are likely to damage the machinery down the line. They can also compromise our quality standards. We need to protect our reputation for good quality output materials." You: "What happens to the rejected items?" Auditee: "Some get melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled." You: "What happens to the waste products?" Auditee: "I'm not sure. I suppose they go to landfill." Which two. of the following actions would you take to investigate further?

Answer: D,F

Explanation:
According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.7 requires that an organization identify and control any nonconforming outputs that do not conform to the requirements of the customer or other relevant requirements. Nonconforming outputs are any outputs from the process, product or service that do not meet the specified quality criteria. Nonconforming outputs must be dealt with in one or more of the following ways:
Correction of the nonconformity
Segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services Informing the customer Authorisation for acceptance under concession The organization must also retain documented information on the description of the nonconformity, the actions taken, any concessions obtained, and the identification of the authority deciding the action to resolve the nonconformity.
In this scenario, you have interviewed a line supervisor who is responsible for managing a manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products. The supervisor has explained that these plastic items are rejected at this stage because they do not meet their processing standards and they can damage their machinery and compromise their quality standards. The supervisor has also mentioned that some of these rejected items are melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled.
Based on this information, you can investigate further by taking two actions:
A: Check the process for handling nonconforming items: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for identifying, segregating, containing, returning or suspending provision of nonconforming items at this stage. You can also check whether there is a system for informing customers about any nonconforming items that may affect their satisfaction or expectations.
D: Determine what happens to the waste products: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for disposing of waste products that cannot be recycled as per environmental regulations and customer requirements.
These two actions would help you to determine whether there are any nonconforming outputs at this stage and how they are controlled by the organization.


NEW QUESTION # 100
Match each of the following statements into the table below to show whether they apply to first-party audits, second-party audits or third-party audits:

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:

Table
Statement
First-party audits
Second-party audits
Third-party audits
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.
Yes
No
No
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.
No
No
Yes
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.
No
Yes
No
Here is a brief explanation of each statement:
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third- party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second- party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.


NEW QUESTION # 101
Scenario 5: Mechanical-Electro (ME) Audit Stages
Mechanical-Electro, better known as ME, is an American company that provides mechanical and electrical services in China. Their services range from air-conditioning systems, ventilation systems, plumbing, to installation of electrical equipment in automobile plants, electronic manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants.
Due to the fierce competition from local Chinese companies and failing to meet customer requirements, ME ' s revenue dropped significantly. In addition, customers ' trust and confidence in the company decreased, and the reputation of the company was damaged.
In light of these developments, the top management of ME decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After having an effective QMS in place for over a year, they applied for a certification audit.
A team of four auditors was appointed for the audit, including Li Na as the audit team leader. Initially, the audit team conducted a general review of ME ' s documents, including the quality policy, operational procedures, inventory lists, QMS scope, process documentation, training records, and previous audit reports.
Li Na stated that this would allow the team to maintain a systematic and structured approach to gathering documents for all audit stages. While reviewing the documented information, the team observed some minor issues but did not identify any major nonconformities. Therefore, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to prepare a report or conduct a meeting with ME ' s representatives at that stage of the audit. She stated that all areas of concern would be discussed in the next phase of the audit.
Following the on-site activities and the opening meeting with ME ' s top management, the audit team structured an audit test plan to verify whether ME's QMS conformed to Clause 8.2.1 (Customer Communication) of ISO 9001.
To do so, they gathered information through group interviews and sampling. Li Na conducted interviews with departmental managers in the first group and then with top management. In addition, she chose a sampling method that sufficiently represented customer complaints from both areas of ME ' s operations.
The team members were responsible for the sampling procedure. They selected a sample size of 4 out of 45 customer complaints received weekly for electrical services and 2 out of 10 complaints for mechanical services.
Afterward, the audit team evaluated the evidence against the audit criteria and generated the audit findings.
Which stages of the audit were performed?

Answer: C

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Understanding Audit Stages Based on ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015
ISO certification audits consist of two main stages:
Stage 1 Audit (Readiness Review)
The organization's documented information is reviewed to assess readiness for Stage 2.
This ensures that the QMS is developed, implemented, and prepared for full assessment.
Stage 2 Audit (On-Site Evaluation)
Auditors assess process implementation and effectiveness through interviews, observations, and evidence collection.
The audit team verifies if the organization meets ISO 9001 requirements in practice.
Why is the Correct Answer B?
The audit team reviewed ME's documents, which is a Stage 1 activity.
The audit team performed interviews, sampling, and on-site verification, which is a Stage 2 activity.
There was no mention of an audit follow-up or a surveillance audit, which occur post-certification.
Why are the Other Options Incorrect?
A (Audit follow-up and Stage 1 Audit) # Follow-up audits occur after certification, which was not the case here.
C (Stage 2 Audit and Surveillance Audit) # Surveillance audits are post-certification audits and were not conducted yet.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.3.1 - Initial Certification Audit (Stage 1 & 2)


NEW QUESTION # 102
Put the following steps of a third-party audit into the correct sequence in which they happen.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
Sequence:
Stage 1 Audit
Stage 2 Opening Meeting
Interviews
Stage 2 Closing Meeting
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings
Issue Certificate
Surveillance Audit
Follow-up Audit
To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Here is a brief explanation of each step:
Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.
Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.
Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.
Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage
2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.
Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.
Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.
Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.


NEW QUESTION # 103
......

Examinations ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Actual Questions: https://www.actual4dumps.com/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor-study-material.html

DOWNLOAD the newest Actual4Dumps ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EJSmEh1e-J_uBG-sj6DzBYoTdYqy_502