無料でクラウドストレージから最新のJapancert Plat-Arch-204 PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lVB74latjD2zudmJGHdJ81P_urqmCC8e
SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204認定試験に受かることを悩んでいたら、Japancertを選びましょう。JapancertのSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204試験トレーニング資料は間違いなく最高のトレーニング資料ですから、それを選ぶことはあなたにとって最高の選択です。IT専門家になりたいですか。そうだったら、Japancertを利用したください。
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Exam |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Select |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Data Architect Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Maintained with annual certification maintenance requirements (no fixed expiration if maintained) |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 58% |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | Approximately 60 questions |
| Recommended Training: | Salesforce Trailhead Integration Architect Learning Path Integration Architecture Designer Modules |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Registration Webassessor (Kryterion exam delivery) |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center (varies by region and provider availability) |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended prerequisite: Salesforce Certified Application Architect and Salesforce Certified System Architect (part of the Salesforce Certified Technical Architect track is strongly recommended). |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/platformintegrationarchitect |
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect衝動的にまたは考慮せずに何かを購入すると、望ましくない選択につながる可能性があります。 その結果を防ぐために,Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architectトレーニング資料を用意しました。 これらは、保証期間中の専門的な練習資料です。 参考のために許容できる価格に加えて、3つのバージョンのすべての資料は、10年以上にわたってこの分野の専門家によって編集されています。 さらに、一連の利点があります。 したがって、Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architectの実際のテストの重要性は言うまでもありません。 今すぐご注文いただいた場合、1年間無料の更新をお送りします。 これらのサプリメントはすべて、Salesforce Certified Platform Integration ArchitectのPlat-Arch-204模擬試験にも役立ちます。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 95
Northern Trail Outfitters needs a synchronous callout from Salesforce to an Order Management System (OMS) when an opportunity is "Closed/Won" with products attached. What should an integration architect do to satisfy these requirements?
正解：B
解説：
To satisfy a requirement for a synchronous callout triggered by a user action, the architect should use a UI-driven approach, such as a Lightning component and a button.
In Salesforce, triggers (Option B) are primarily used for asynchronous logic in integration contexts. Because a trigger executes as part of the database save operation, making a synchronous callout directly from a trigger is prohibited as it would block the database transaction until the external system responds, leading to performance degradation and "uncommitted work pending" errors. If a trigger must initiate an integration, it must do so asynchronously (using @future or Queueable Apex), which violates the requirement for a synchronous call.
By using a Lightning component, the architect can initiate a synchronous Request-and-Reply pattern. When the sales rep clicks the "7Submit to OMS" button, the componen8t invokes an Apex method that makes the REST callout to the OMS in real-time. The user remains on the page while the system waits for the OMS to respond, allowing for immediate feedback-such as an order confirmation number or an error message-to be displayed in the UI. A Batch Apex job (Option C) is inherently asynchronous and delayed, making it unsuitable for a synchronous, real-time fulfillment requirement.
質問 # 96
Northern Trail Outfitters is planning to perform nightly batch loads into Salesforce using the Bulk API. The CIO is curious about monitoring recommendations for the jobs from the technical architect. Which recommendation should help meet the requirements?
正解：C
質問 # 97
Which Web Services Description Language (WSDL) should an architect consider when creating an integration that might be used for more than one Salesforce org and different metadata?
正解：B
解説：
In the world of Salesforce SOAP APIs, the choice of WSDL depends on the nature of the application being built. When an architect needs to build an integration that is org-agnostic-meaning it can work across multiple different Salesforce organizations with varying custom objects and fields-the Partner WSDL is the correct choice.
The Partner WSDL is loosely-typed. It does not contain information about an org's specific custom metadata; instead, it uses a generic sObject structure. This allows a single client application (like a third-party integration tool or a mobile app) to connect to any Salesforce org and dynamically discover its schema at runtime. Because it is not tied to a specific org's metadata, it does not need to be regenerated every time a custom field is added to one of the target orgs.
In contrast, Option A (Enterprise WSDL) is strongly-typed. It is generated specifically for one org and contains hard-coded references to that org's custom objects and fields. While this provides better compile-time safety for internal, single-org integrations, it is unsuitable for an application intended for "more than one Salesforce org" because the WSDL would be invalid for any org that doesn't have the exact same metadata. Option C is a general term; the actual choices provided by Salesforce for integration are the Partner or Enterprise WSDLs. Therefore, for maximum flexibility and reusability across a multi-org landscape, the Partner WSDL is the industry standard.
質問 # 98
A company uses Customer Community for course registration. The payment gateway takes more than 30 seconds to process transactions. Students want results in real time to retry if errors occur. What is the recommended integration approach?
正解：B
解説：
Standard synchronous Apex callouts have a timeout limit, and more importantly, Salesforce limits the number of long-running requests (those lasting longer than 5 seconds) that can execute concurrently. If a payment gateway consistently takes 30 seconds, a few simultaneous users could easily exhaust the org's concurrent request limit, causing the entire system to stop responding.
The Continuation pattern (Option C) is designed specifically for this "long-wait" scenario. It allows the Apex request to be suspended while waiting for the external service to respond, freeing up the Salesforce worker thread to handle other users. Once the gateway responds, the suspended process resumes and returns the result to the student's browser. This provides the "real-time" experience required for the student to retry immediately without the risk of bringing down the entire community due to thread exhaustion.
質問 # 99
Universal Containers (UC) support agents would like to open bank accounts on the spot. During the process, agents execute credit checks through external agencies. At any given time, up to 30 concurrent reps will be using the service. Which error handling mechanisms should be built to display an error to the agent when the credit verification process has failed?
正解：C
解説：
In a synchronous Request-Reply scenario where a bank agent is waiting "on the spot" for a credit check, the error-handling strategy must balance immediate feedback with system resilience.
Option A is the recommended architectural approach for enterprise resiliency. By placing a Middleware layer (like MuleSoft) between Salesforce and the credit agencies, the architect can implement sophisticated error-handling patterns that are invisible to the user but critical for success. If a credit agency's API is momentarily unreachable, the middleware can perform automated retries (e.g., three attempts with 500ms intervals). If the retries still fail, the middleware sends a clean, structured error response back to Salesforce.
Option B (Fire and Forget) is fundamentally unsuitable for this use case because the agent needs the result immediately to open the account; they cannot wait for a callback that might arrive hours later. Option C (Mock service) is only a testing tool and provides no value in a production environment where real financial data is required. By delegating the retry logic to the middleware, the architect protects Salesforce's concurrent request limits (since the agent only occupies a thread for the duration of the final response) and ensures that transient network issues do not result in a "failed" bank account application for the customer.
質問 # 100
......
Plat-Arch-204テスト模擬問題集: https://www.japancert.com/Plat-Arch-204.html
P.S. JapancertがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいPlat-Arch-204ダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lVB74latjD2zudmJGHdJ81P_urqmCC8e