BTW, DOWNLOAD part of ActualVCE Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rm5CKiGzHxrxYzl7Fqg874QE8cP8Izz1
Top Rated Features of Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Practice Test Questions. The ActualVCE is committed to making the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam preparation journey simple, smart, and swift. To meet this objective the ActualVCE is offering Data-Engineer-Associate practice test questions with top-rated features. These features are updated and real Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions, availability of AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Data-Engineer-Associate exam real questions in three easy-to-use and compatible formats, three months free updated Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions download facility, affordable price and 100 percent AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Data-Engineer-Associate exam passing money back guarantee.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Implement data security controls - Apply governance and compliance best practices |
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Ingest and transform data using AWS services - Build and manage data pipelines |
| Topic 3: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Troubleshoot data workflow issues - Monitor and maintain data pipelines |
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Select appropriate data storage solutions - Optimize storage performance and cost |
>> Premium Data-Engineer-Associate Files <<
You may feel astonished and doubtful about this figure; but we do make our Data-Engineer-Associate exam dumps well received by most customers. Better still, the 98-99% pass rate has helped most of the candidates get the certification successfully, which is far beyond that of others in this field. In recent years, supported by our professional expert team, our Data-Engineer-Associate test braindumps have grown up and have made huge progress. Our Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps strive for providing you a comfortable study platform and continuously explore more functions to meet every customer’s requirements. We may foresee the prosperous talent market with more and more workers attempting to reach a high level through the Amazon certification.
NEW QUESTION # 168
A retail company stores order information in an Amazon Aurora table named Orders. The company needs to create operational reports from the Orders table with minimal latency. The Orders table contains billions of rows, and over 100,000 transactions can occur each second.
A marketing team needs to join the Orders data with an Amazon Redshift table named Campaigns in the marketing team's data warehouse. The operational Aurora database must not be affected.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational effort?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 169
A data engineer needs to create an AWS Lambda function that converts the format of data from .csv to Apache Parquet. The Lambda function must run only if a user uploads a .csv file to an Amazon S3 bucket.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Option A is the correct answer because it meets the requirements with the least operational overhead. Creating an S3 event notification that has an event type of s3:ObjectCreated:* will trigger the Lambda function whenever a new object is created in the S3 bucket. Using a filter rule to generate notifications only when the suffix includes .csv will ensure that the Lambda function only runs for .csv files. Setting the ARN of the Lambda function as the destination for the event notification will directly invoke the Lambda function without any additional steps.
Option B is incorrect because it requires the user to tag the objects with .csv, which adds an extra step and increases the operational overhead.
Option C is incorrect because it uses an event type of s3:*, which will trigger the Lambda function for any S3 event, not just object creation. This could result in unnecessary invocations and increased costs.
Option D is incorrect because it involves creating and subscribing to an SNS topic, which adds an extra layer of complexity and operational overhead.
References:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation, Section 3.2: S3 Event Notifications and Lambda Functions, Pages 67-69 Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 4: Data Transformation, Lesson 4.2: AWS Lambda, Pages 4-8 AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Lambda Developer Guide, Working with AWS Lambda Functions, Configuring Function Triggers, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3, Pages 1-5
NEW QUESTION # 170
A data engineer needs to optimize the performance of a data pipeline that handles retail orders. Data about the orders is ingested daily into an Amazon S3 bucket.
The data engineer runs queries once each week to extract metrics from the orders data based on the order date for multiple date ranges. The data engineer needs an optimization solution that ensures the query performance will not degrade when the volume of data increases.
Answer: B
Explanation:
For query workloads on S3 data that depend on date-based filters, partitioning by order date optimizes performance and cost because Athena reads only the relevant partitions.
Athena scales automatically and doesn't degrade with increasing data size when partitions are managed efficiently.
"Partitioning data in Amazon S3 based on query predicates such as order date improves Athena query performance and reduces scanned data volume."
- Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf This is the most cost-effective and scalable option for date-based queries.
NEW QUESTION # 171
A company is building a new application that ingests CSV files into Amazon Redshift. The company has developed the frontend for the application.
The files are stored in an Amazon S3 bucket. Files are no larger than 5 MB.
A data engineer is developing the extract, transform, and load (ETL) pipeline for the CSV files. The data engineer configured a Redshift cluster and an AWS Lambda function that copies the data out of the files into the Redshift cluster.
Which additional steps should the data engineer perform to meet these requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Option A is the most direct and operationally efficient way to trigger the existing Lambda-based load into Amazon Redshift whenever a new CSV file is uploaded to Amazon S3. The key requirement is event-driven automation on "new object created" events, and the study material explicitly describes using Amazon EventBridge to react to S3 uploads by creating a rule on the default event bus and routing matching events to a target application.
Compared with queue-based designs (Options B and D), Option A reduces components: there is no need to manage an SQS queue, batching/visibility timeout behavior, or retry semantics at the consumer layer. This is especially appropriate because the files are small (# 5 MB) and the Lambda function is already implemented to perform the copy/load step. Using DMS (Option C) is not designed for "S3 object arrival # Lambda # Redshift" event triggering; it introduces unnecessary services and operational work for a simple file-ingestion trigger.
Therefore, integrating S3 event notifications with EventBridge and targeting the Lambda function best meets the requirement with the least added complexity.
NEW QUESTION # 172
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule.
Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity:
provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with nominimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns.
You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
References:
1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 173
......
ActualVCE provides 24/7 customer support to answer any of your queries or concerns regarding the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) certification exam. They have a team of highly skilled and experienced professionals who have a thorough knowledge of the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam questions and format.
Data-Engineer-Associate Sample Questions Answers: https://www.actualvce.com/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate-valid-vce-dumps.html
2026 Latest ActualVCE Data-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rm5CKiGzHxrxYzl7Fqg874QE8cP8Izz1