P.S. Free & New 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestKingFree: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wEc7EkoYoA5v6pI3CylLVr1P8cAP-RXH
Now the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) 312-97 exam dumps have become the first choice of 312-97 exam candidates. With the top-notch and updated ECCouncil 312-97 test questions you can ace your EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) 312-97 exam success journey. The thousands of ECCouncil 312-97 Certification Exam candidates have passed their dream ECCouncil 312-97 certification and they all used the valid and real EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) 312-97 exam questions. You can also trust ECCouncil 312-97 pdf questions and practice tests.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Related Certifications: | CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) CND (Certified Network Defender) |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
The TestKingFree is committed to acing the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam questions preparation quickly, simply, and smartly. To achieve this objective TestKingFree is offering valid, updated, and real EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam dumps in three high-in-demand formats. These EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam questions formats are PDF dumps files, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice test software.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 34
A technology company is deploying a web-based service that processes user requests and interacts with external databases. As part of their DevSecOps strategy, the security team wants to implement an additional security measure within the CI/CD pipeline. They are looking for a solution to be integrated with the pipeline that will monitor and analyze HTTP traffic before it reaches the application, block unauthorized or malicious requests that could impact system integrity and enhance security beyond traditional network firewalls that inspect only IP addresses and ports. Which of the following service should the team integrate to meet these objectives?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Web Application Firewall (WAF) inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic at the application layer before it reaches the application, blocking malicious requests such as SQL injection and XSS-going beyond traditional firewalls that only filter IPs and ports, and integrating into the pipeline. SWGs filter outbound user web access, IDS detects but doesn't block at the app layer, and NGFWs still operate mainly on network-layer attributes.
NEW QUESTION # 35
A multinational retail company is adopting AWS to modernize its software development lifecycle and improve automation, scalability, and deployment efficiency. The DevOps team is currently facing several challenges, including manual code compilation and testing, slow-release cycles, and frequent deployment errors that lead to application downtime. To address these issues, the company plans to integrate AWS DevOps services to optimize its CI/CD pipeline. The team needs a solution that can compile source code, run automated tests, and generate deployment-ready artifacts without requiring manual setup or server management. By implementing this solution, they aim to process multiple builds in parallel, improve test automation, and accelerate software delivery. Which AWS DevOps service should the company use to meet this requirement?
Answer: C
Explanation:
AWS CodeBuild is the fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs automated tests, and produces deployment-ready artifacts-scaling to process multiple builds in parallel with no servers to manage. CodePipeline orchestrates the workflow, CodeDeploy performs deployments, and CodeCatalyst is a broader unified DevOps service, but the described build/test/artifact capability is CodeBuild.
NEW QUESTION # 36
(Jason Wylie has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company located in Sacramento, California. He would like to use Jenkins for CI and Azure Pipelines for CD to deploy a Spring Boot app to an Azure Container Service (AKS) Kubernetes cluster. He created a namespace for deploying the Jenkins in AKS, and then deployed the Jenkins app to the Pod. Which of the following commands should Jason run to see the pods that have been spun up and running?)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Kubernetes uses namespaces to logically isolate resources such as pods, services, and deployments. When an application like Jenkins is deployed into a specific namespace, the correct way to view the pods running in that namespace is by using the -n (or --namespace) flag with the kubectl get pods command. The command kubectl get pods -n jenkins instructs Kubernetes to list all pods in the "jenkins" namespace. The other options use invalid or unrelated flags that are not supported for namespace selection. Verifying pod status during the Release and Deploy stage is essential to ensure that applications have been deployed successfully and are running as expected before exposing services or proceeding to monitoring. This step supports deployment validation and operational readiness in Kubernetes-based DevSecOps environments.
NEW QUESTION # 37
(Jeremy Renner has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer at an IT company that develops customized software to various customers stretched across the globe. His organization is using Microsoft Azure DevOps Services. Using an IaC tool, Jeremey deployed the infrastructure in Azure. He would like to integrate Chef InSpec with Azure to ensure that the deployed infrastructure is in accordance with the architecture and industrial standards and the security policies are appropriately implemented. Therefore, he downloaded and installed Chef InSpec. He used Azure CLI command for creating an Azure Service Principal with reader permission to the Azure resources, then he exported the generated credentials. After installation and configuration of Chef InSpec, he would like to create the structure and profile. Which of the following commands should Jeremy use to create a new folder jyren-azureTests with all the required artifacts for InSpec tests?)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Chef InSpec provides a command-line interface for creating and executing compliance profiles. To initialize a new profile with the required directory structure, metadata file, and example controls, the correct command is inspec init profile <profile-name>. In Jeremy's case, running inspec init profile jyren-azureTests creates a new folder with all required artifacts needed to write and run Azure compliance tests. Options using prof are invalid abbreviations, and prefixing the command with chef is incorrect when using the InSpec CLI directly.
Creating a structured InSpec profile during the Build and Test stage enables automated validation of infrastructure against architectural standards and security policies, supporting Infrastructure as Code security and continuous compliance practices.
========
NEW QUESTION # 38
Carlos Mendoza, a DevSecOps engineer at a Mexico City retail chain, wants his organization to define, in a single collaborative document, the specific security responsibilities that shift from the cloud provider to his own team when using a managed Kubernetes service (like EKS) versus a fully self-hosted cluster. Which concept is Carlos applying?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Shared Responsibility Model explicitly delineates which security responsibilities belong to the cloud service provider (such as securing the underlying physical infrastructure and, for managed Kubernetes, the control plane) versus the customer (such as securing workloads, IAM configurations, network policies, and data), and clarifying this division is precisely what Carlos is doing when comparing a managed service like EKS to a self-hosted cluster. Zero Trust Architecture is a security philosophy requiring continuous verification of identity and context for every access request, regardless of network location, but does not itself define provider-versus- customer responsibility boundaries. The Principle of Least Privilege dictates that entities should be granted only the minimum access necessary to perform their function, a distinct concept from responsibility division between provider and customer. Defense in Depth refers to layering multiple independent security controls throughout a system, which is a general strategy rather than a delineation of provider/customer duties. Because Carlos is specifically defining what security duties shift between provider and customer for managed versus self-hosted services, the Shared Responsibility Model is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 39
......
Detailed 312-97 Study Dumps: https://www.testkingfree.com/ECCouncil/312-97-practice-exam-dumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of TestKingFree 312-97 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wEc7EkoYoA5v6pI3CylLVr1P8cAP-RXH