%20Test%20Practice)
DOWNLOAD the newest Exam4Free Data-Engineer-Associate PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QSM4KXzTUT8wBHuuI8FODNVVwcxzDRUR
Once you establish your grip on our Data-Engineer-Associate exam materials, the real exam questions will be a piece of cake for you. There are three different versions of our Data-Engineer-Associate study questions for you to choose: the PDF, Software and APP online. Though the displays are totally different, the content of the Data-Engineer-Associate Practice Guide is the same. You can pass the exam with no matter whice version you want to buy.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Apply programming concepts
|
| Topic 2: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor data pipelines
|
| Topic 3: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Apply authentication and authorization
|
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Manage data lifecycle
|
>> New Data-Engineer-Associate Test Practice <<
Are you still worrying about the high difficulty to pass Amazon certification Data-Engineer-Associate exam? Are you still sleeplessly endeavoring to review the book in order to pass Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Certification? Do you want to pass Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam certification faster? Be quick to select our Exam4Free! Having it can quickly fulfill your dreams.
NEW QUESTION # 169
A company has a data lake in Amazon S3. The company collects AWS CloudTrail logs for multiple applications. The company stores the logs in the data lake, catalogs the logs in AWS Glue, and partitions the logs based on the year. The company uses Amazon Athena to analyze the logs.
Recently, customers reported that a query on one of the Athena tables did not return any data. A data engineer must resolve the issue.
Which combination of troubleshooting steps should the data engineer take? (Select TWO.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The problem likely arises from Athena not being able to read from the correct S3 location or missing partitions. The two most relevant troubleshooting steps involve checking the S3 location and repairing the table metadata.
* A. Confirm that Athena is pointing to the correct Amazon S3 location:
* One of the most common issues with missing data in Athena queries is that the query is pointed to an incorrect or outdated S3 location. Checking the S3 path ensures Athena is querying the correct data.
Reference:Amazon Athena Troubleshooting
C: Use the MSCK REPAIR TABLE command:
When new partitions are added to the S3 bucket without being reflected in the Glue Data Catalog, Athena queries will not return data from those partitions. The MSCK REPAIR TABLE command updates the Glue Data Catalog with the latest partitions.
Reference:MSCK REPAIR TABLE Command
Alternatives Considered:
B (Increase query timeout): Timeout issues are unrelated to missing data.
D (Restart Athena): Athena does not require restarting.
E (Delete and recreate table): This introduces unnecessary overhead when the issue can be resolved by repairing the table and confirming the S3 location.
References:
Athena Query Fails to Return Data
NEW QUESTION # 170
A data engineer uploads unpredictable volumes of unstructured data to an Amazon S3 bucket throughout the day. The data engineer needs to transform the data by using complex processing logic that takes from 5 to 30 minutes to complete. The solution must automatically scale with incoming data volume and process each uploaded file only one time.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B because the workload requires complex processing that can run for 5 to 30 minutes, automatic scaling, and exactly-once-style avoidance of reprocessing source files. AWS Glue jobs are designed for serverless ETL processing over S3 data, and job bookmarks track previously processed source data so the job processes only new data on later runs. AWS documentation states that Glue job bookmarks help prevent reprocessing of old data and can track S3 source files for supported formats. Lambda is a poor fit because it has execution-duration limits and is not ideal for 30-minute complex transformations. EMR and EC2 polling add cluster and infrastructure management. Glue jobs with bookmarks provide the least operational overhead for this data engineering pattern.
NEW QUESTION # 171
A security company stores IoT data that is in JSON format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The data structure can change when the company upgrades the IoT devices. The company wants to create a data catalog that includes the IoT data. The company's analytics department will use the data catalog to index the data.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The best solution to meet the requirements of creating a data catalog that includes the IoT data, and allowing the analytics department to index the data, most cost-effectively, is to create an Amazon Athena workgroup, explore the data that is in Amazon S3 by using Apache Spark through Athena, and provide the Athena workgroup schema and tables to the analytics department.
Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python1. Amazon Athena also supports Apache Spark, an open-source distributed processing framework that can run large-scale data analytics applications across clusters of servers2. You can use Athena to run Spark code on data in Amazon S3 without having to set up, manage, or scale any infrastructure. You can also use Athena to create and manage external tables that point to your data in Amazon S3, and store them in an external data catalog, such as AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon Athena Data Catalog, or your own Apache Hive metastore3. You can create Athena workgroups to separate query execution and resource allocation based on different criteria, such as users, teams, or applications4. You can share the schemas and tables in your Athena workgroup with other users or applications, such as Amazon QuickSight, for data visualization and analysis5.
Using Athena and Spark to create a data catalog and explore the IoT data in Amazon S3 is the most cost-effective solution, as you pay only for the queries you run or the compute you use, and you pay nothing when the service is idle1. You also save on the operational overhead and complexity of managing data warehouse infrastructure, as Athena and Spark are serverless and scalable. You can also benefit from the flexibility and performance of Athena and Spark, as they support various data formats, including JSON, and can handle schema changes and complex queries efficiently.
Option A is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating a new AWS Glue workload to orchestrate theingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Glue Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components6. AWS Glue Schema Registry is a service that allows you to centrally store and manage the schemas of your streaming data in AWS Glue Data Catalog7. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores8. Amazon Redshift Serverless is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to run and scale analytics without having to manage data warehouse infrastructure9. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your ETL jobs8. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue and Amazon Redshift Serverless would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless, and then query it from there, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option B is not the best solution, as creating an Amazon Redshift provisioned cluster, creating an Amazon Redshift Spectrum database for the analytics department to explore the data that is in Amazon S3, and creating Redshift stored procedures to load the data into Amazon Redshift, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters are clusters that you create and manage by specifying the number and type of nodes, and the amount of storage and compute capacity10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL11. Redshift stored procedures are SQL statements that you can define and store in Amazon Redshift, and then call them by using the CALL command12. While these features are powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters charge you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries11. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters and Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision andmanage the cluster, create an external schema and database for the data in Amazon S3, and load the data into the cluster using stored procedures, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option D is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating AWS Lambda user defined functions (UDFs) by using the Amazon Redshift Data API, and creating an AWS Step Functions job to orchestrate the ingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers13. AWS Lambda UDFs are Lambda functions that you can invoke from within an Amazon Redshift query. Amazon Redshift Data API is a service that allows you to run SQL statements on Amazon Redshift clusters using HTTP requests, without needing a persistent connection. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Lambda charges you based on the number of requests and the duration of your functions13. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. AWS Step Functions charges you based on the number of state transitions in your workflows. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue, AWS Lambda, Amazon Redshift Data API, and AWS Step Functions would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to create and invoke Lambda functions to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless using the Data API, and coordinate the ingestion process using Step Functions, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark. References:
What is Amazon Athena?
Apache Spark on Amazon Athena
Creating tables, updating the schema, and adding new partitions in the Data Catalog from AWS Glue ETL jobs Managing Athena workgroups Using Amazon QuickSight to visualize data in Amazon Athena AWS Glue Data Catalog AWS Glue Schema Registry What is AWS Glue?
Amazon Redshift Serverless
Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters
Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift
What is AWS Lambda?
[Creating and using AWS Lambda UDFs]
[Using the Amazon Redshift Data API]
[What is AWS Step Functions?]
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
NEW QUESTION # 172
A company is migrating its database servers from Amazon EC2 instances that run Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server DB instances. The company's analytics team must export large data elements every day until the migration is complete. The data elements are the result of SQL joins across multiple tables. The data must be in Apache Parquet format. The analytics team must store the data in Amazon S3.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST operationally efficient way?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Option A is the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements because it minimizes the number of steps and services involved in the data export process. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including Amazon S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. By creating a view in the SQL Server databases that contains the required data elements, the AWS Glue job can select the data directly from the view without having to perform any joins or transformations on the source data. The AWS Glue job can then transfer the data in Parquet format to an S3 bucket and run on a daily schedule.
Option B is not operationally efficient because it involves multiple steps and services to export the data. SQL Server Agent is a tool that can run scheduled tasks on SQL Server databases, such as executing SQL queries.
However, SQL Server Agent cannot directly export data to S3, so the query output must be saved as .csv objects on the EC2 instance. Then, an S3 event must be configured to trigger an AWS Lambda function that can transform the .csv objects to Parquet format and upload them to S3. This option adds complexity and latency to the data export process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Option C is not operationally efficient because it introduces an unnecessary step of running an AWS Glue crawler to read the view. An AWS Glue crawler is a service that can scan data sources and create metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. The Data Catalog is a central repository that stores information about the data sources, such as schema, format, and location. However, in this scenario, the schema and format of the data elements are already known and fixed, so there is no need to run a crawler to discover them. The AWS Glue job can directly select the data from the view without using the Data Catalog. Running a crawler adds extra time and cost to the data export process.
Option D is not operationally efficient because it requires custom code and configuration to query the databases and transform the data. An AWS Lambda function is a service that can run code in response to events or triggers, such as Amazon EventBridge. Amazon EventBridge is a service that can connect applications and services with event sources, such as schedules, and route them to targets, such as Lambda functions. However, in this scenario, using a Lambda function to query the databases and transform the data is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining code that uses JDBC to connect to the SQL Server databases, retrieve the required data, convert the data to Parquet format, and transfer the data to S3.
This option also has limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency of the Lambda function, which may affect the performance and reliability of the data export process.
References:
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
* AWS Glue Documentation
* Working with Views in AWS Glue
* Converting to Columnar Formats
NEW QUESTION # 173
A data engineer is troubleshooting an AWS Glue workflow that occasionally fails. The engineer determines that the failures are a result of data quality issues. A business reporting team needs to receive an email notification any time the workflow fails in the future.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 174
......
The Exam4Free is a leading platform that is committed to offering to make Amazon Exam Questions preparation simple, smart, and successful. To achieve this objective Exam4Free has got the services of experienced and qualified Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam trainers. They work together and put all their efforts and ensure the top standard of Exam4Free Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam dumps all the time.
Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Revision Plan: https://www.exam4free.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-valid-dumps.html
2026 Latest Exam4Free Data-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QSM4KXzTUT8wBHuuI8FODNVVwcxzDRUR