PECB Latest Study ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam - Itcertmaster Ensures you a Easy Studying Experience

P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Itcertmaster: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B-KfhmdqLK8P_iWbi6q_E1EFOMSmnWPR

If you are the person who is willing to get ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam prep, our products would be the perfect choice for you. Here are some advantages of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorexam prep, our study materials guarantee the high-efficient preparing time for you to make progress is mainly attributed to our marvelous organization of the content and layout which can make our customers well-focused and targeted during the learning process. If you are interested our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Guide Torrent, please contact us immediately, we would show our greatest enthusiasm to help you obtain the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is an internationally recognized exam that focuses on the auditing and management of information security systems. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is intended for professionals who are interested in auditing and assessing an organization's information security management system (ISMS) against the ISO/IEC 27001 standard.

>> Latest Study ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions <<

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Testking - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Question

Itcertmaster has been to make the greatest efforts to provide the best and most convenient service for our candidates. High speed and high efficiency are certainly the most important points. In today's society, high efficiency is hot topic everywhere. So we designed training materials which have hign efficiency for the majority of candidates. It allows candidates to grasp the knowledge quickly, and achieved excellent results in the exam. Itcertmaster's PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Training materials can help you to save a lot of time and effort. You can also use the extra time and effort to earn more money.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is intended for those individuals who have a thorough understanding of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, which outlines requirements for an ISMS. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is designed for professionals who have experience in information security management and auditing, and who are seeking to enhance their skills and knowledge in this area. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam provides a comprehensive assessment of the candidate's ability to conduct ISMS audits, evaluate the effectiveness of the system, and identify areas for improvement.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q188-Q193):

NEW QUESTION # 188
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations, including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment's top management to understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment's representatives stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment's operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to control employees' access rights. Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities. The procedures of the company stated that "Logs recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed," yet the company did not present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation for certification.
According to scenario 6, the marketing department employees were not following the access control policy. Which option is correct in this case?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Even though the marketing department was not included in the audit scope, the issue of employees' access rights control must be communicated to Sinvestment's representatives and included in the audit report because it is part of Sinvestment's information security policy. It reflects on the overall adherence to the ISMS requirements.


NEW QUESTION # 189
Which three of the following options are an advantage of using a sampling plan for the audit?

Answer: C,D,E

Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, a sampling plan is a method for selecting a representative subset of the audit evidence from a defined population1. A sampling plan can have several advantages for the audit, such as providing a suitable understanding of the ISMS by covering its key processes, activities, and controls; implementing the audit plan efficiently by optimizing the use of time and resources; and giving confidence in the audit results by ensuring that the sample is sufficient, reliable, and unbiased1. Therefore, these three options are examples of advantages of using a sampling plan for the audit. The other options are not advantages, but rather disadvantages or risks of using a sampling plan. For example, overruling the auditor's instincts may lead to missing important evidence or issues that are not covered by the sampling plan; using the same plan for consecutive audits may reduce the effectiveness and validity of the audit results; and missing key issues may result from an inadequate or inappropriate sampling plan1. References: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 190
Scenario 1
Fintive is a distinguished security provider specializing in online payments and protection solutions. Founded in 1999 by Thomas Fin in San Jose, California, Fintive offers services to companies operating online that seek to improve their information security, prevent fraud, and protect user information such as personally identifiable information (PII).
Fintive bases its decision-making and operational processes on previous cases, gathering customer data, classifying them according to the case, and analyzing them.
Initially, Fintive required a large number of employees to be able to conduct such complex analyses.
However, as technology advanced, the company recognized an opportunity to implement a modern tool - a chatbot - to achieve pattern analyses aimed at preventing fraud in real time. This tool would also assist in improving customer service.
The initial idea was communicated to the software development team, who supported the initiative and were assigned to work on the project. They began integrating the chatbot into the existing system and set an objective regarding the chatbot, which was to answer 85% of all chat queries.
After successfully integrating the chatbot, the company released it for customer use. However, the chatbot exhibited several issues. Due to insufficient testing and a lack of sample data provided during the training phase - when it was supposed to learn the query pattern - the chatbot failed to effectively address user queries. Additionally, it sent random files to users when it encountered invalid inputs, such as unusual patterns of dots and special characters.
Consequently, the chatbot could not effectively answer customer queries, overwhelming traditional customer support and preventing them from assisting customers with their requests.
Recognizing the potential risks, Fintive decided to implement a set of new controls. The measures included enabling comprehensive audit logging, configuring automated alert systems to flag unusual activities, performing periodic access reviews, and monitoring system behavior for anomalies. The objective was to identify unauthorized access, errors, or suspicious activities in a timely manner, ensuring that any potential issues could be quickly recognized and investigated before causing significant harm.
Question
Based on Scenario 1, what type of control did Fintive implement in response to the identified issues?

Answer: A

Explanation:
From Exact Extract:
1. Definition of control types (ISO-aligned understanding)
In information security management:
* Preventive controls are designed to prevent an incident from occurring.
* Detective controls are designed to identify and detect incidents or anomalies after or as they occur.
* Corrective controls are designed to correct issues after detection.
2. Analysis of the controls implemented by Fintive
The scenario explicitly states that Fintive implemented the following controls:
* Comprehensive audit logging
* Automated alert systems to flag unusual activities
* Periodic access reviews
* Monitoring system behavior for anomalies
All of these controls are designed to:
* Detect unauthorized access
* Detect errors
* Detect suspicious activities
* Enable investigation after detection
This aligns directly with detective controls, not preventive or corrective.
3. ISO/IEC 27002:2022 - Exact control alignment
The controls implemented correspond to Annex A technological and organisational detective controls, including:
* A.8.15 - Logging
Logging enables the detection and investigation of security events.
* A.8.16 - Monitoring activities
Monitoring is used to detect anomalous behaviour and potential security incidents.
* A.5.18 - Access rights (periodic reviews)
Access reviews detect inappropriate or excessive access.
These controls do not prevent the chatbot from malfunctioning, nor do they directly fix it - they detect issues so that action can be taken.
4. Why the other options are incorrect
* A. Preventive - IncorrectPreventive controls would include secure coding practices, input validation, sandboxing, or improved testing before release. These were not the controls described.
* C. Corrective - IncorrectCorrective controls would involve fixing the chatbot logic, retraining the model, or disabling unsafe features. The scenario explicitly focuses on detection and monitoring, not correction.
Auditor Conclusion
Fintive implemented detective controls to identify unauthorized access, errors, and suspicious activity arising from the chatbot's behaviour. This is consistent with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 risk treatment and monitoring requirements.


NEW QUESTION # 191
What would be the reference for you to know who should have access to data/document?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The reference for you to know who should have access to data/document is the Access Control List (ACL), which is a list of users or groups who are authorized to access a specific data/document and their respective access rights (such as read, write, modify, delete, etc.). The ACL is a tool for implementing the access control policy of the organization, which is defined in accordance with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 9.4.1. The ACL should be maintained and updated regularly to ensure that only authorized users can access the data/document. References: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course],
[ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements]


NEW QUESTION # 192
Which four of the following statements about audit reports are true?

Answer: C,E,G,H


NEW QUESTION # 193
......

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Testking: https://www.itcertmaster.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor.html

2026 Latest Itcertmaster ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B-KfhmdqLK8P_iWbi6q_E1EFOMSmnWPR