Latest 312-97 Latest Test Vce - 100% Pass 312-97 Exam

P.S. Free 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Exams4sures: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OuWJKe4gp1mhIJWE292Cd5bVrs0jvshk

Our 312-97 learning materials are known for instant download. You can get the download link and password within ten minutes after purchasing, therefore you can start your learning as quickly as possible. Besides, 312-97 exam dumps contain most of knowledge points of the exam, and it will be enough for you to pass the exam, and in the process of practicing 312-97 Exam Dumps, your professional ability will also be improved. We offer you free update for 365 days after purchasing. The latest version for 312-97 training materials will be sent to your email automatically.

ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:EC-Council
Exam Name:EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Exam
Exam Number:312-97
Certificate Validity Period:3 years
Passing Score:70%
Real Exam Qty:100
Available Languages:Japanese, English, Korean, Simplified Chinese
Exam Format:Multiple Choice Questions
Exam Price:$550 USD
Exam Duration:240 minutes
Recommended Training:EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer Official Training
Exam Registration:EC-Council Official Registration
Sample Questions:ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions
Exam Way:Online via EC-Council Exam Portal or ECC Exam Center
Pre Condition:2 years of work experience in information security domain if not attending official training; $100 USD non-refundable application fee required
Official Syllabus URL:https://www.eccouncil.org/train-certify/certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde/

>> 312-97 Latest Test Vce <<

New 312-97 Braindumps Files | Reliable 312-97 Exam Question

You can download and try out our EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) exam torrent freely before you purchase our product. Our product provides the demo thus you can have a full understanding of our 312-97 prep torrent. Our study materials can boosts your confidence for real exam, and will help you remember the exam questions and answers that you will take part in. You can decide which version is what you need actually and then buy the version of EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) exam torrent you want.

ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Understanding DevOps Culture: This module introduces DevOps principles, covering cultural and technical foundations that emphasize collaboration between development and operations teams. It addresses automation, CI
  • CD practices, continuous improvement, and the essential communication patterns needed for faster, reliable software delivery.
Topic 2
  • DevSecOps Pipeline - Build and Test Stage: This module explores integrating automated security testing into build and testing processes through CI pipelines. It covers SAST and DAST approaches to identify and address vulnerabilities early in development.
Topic 3
  • DevSecOps Pipeline - Plan Stage: This module covers the planning phase, emphasizing security requirement identification and threat modeling. It highlights cross-functional collaboration between development, security, and operations teams to ensure alignment with security goals.
Topic 4
  • DevSecOps Pipeline - Release and Deploy Stage: This module explains maintaining security during release and deployment through secure techniques and infrastructure as code security. It covers container security tools, release management, and secure configuration practices for production transitions.

ECCouncil EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Sample Questions (Q146-Q151):

NEW QUESTION # 146
Ingrid Larsen, a release engineer at an Oslo renewable energy company, wants to deploy a new version of a critical control-system API to only 5% of production traffic initially, monitoring error rates before a full rollout. Which deployment strategy is she using?

Answer: B

Explanation:
Canary deployment routes a small, controlled percentage of production traffic (in this case, 5%) to the new version while the majority continues to use the stable version, allowing teams to monitor real-world metrics like error rates and latency before deciding to proceed with a full rollout -- this is exactly Ingrid's approach. Blue-green deployment instead maintains two complete, identical environments and switches all traffic at once from the old (blue) to the new (green) environment rather than a gradual percentage-based shift. Recreate deployment terminates the old version entirely before starting the new one, causing downtime, which contradicts the gradual traffic- splitting Ingrid describes. Rolling deployment incrementally replaces instances of the old version with the new one across the infrastructure rather than splitting live traffic by percentage to a parallel version. Since Ingrid is directing a specific traffic percentage to the new version for monitoring, canary deployment is correct.


NEW QUESTION # 147
(Craig Kelly has been working as a software development team leader in an IT company over the past 8 years.
His team is working on the development of an Android application product. Sandra Oliver, a DevSecOps engineer, used DAST tools and fuzz testing to perform advanced checks on the Android application product and detected critical and high severity issues. She provided the information about the security issues and the recommendations to mitigate them to Craig's team. Which type of security checks performed by Sandra involve detection of critical and high severity issues using DAST tools and fuzz testing?)

Answer: A

Explanation:
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and fuzz testing require a running application in order to actively probe for vulnerabilities such as injection flaws, authentication bypasses, and improper input handling. These techniques are therefore performed after the application has been built and deployed to a testing environment, categorizing them astest-time checks. Commit-time and build-time checks rely primarily on static analysis and dependency scanning and do not exercise application behavior at runtime.
Deploy-time checks focus on configuration validation rather than aggressive attack simulation. Test-time checks are specifically designed to uncover critical and high-severity vulnerabilities by mimicking real-world attack scenarios. Performing DAST and fuzz testing during this stage allows teams to detect exploitable flaws before production release, significantly strengthening application security.
========


NEW QUESTION # 148
Frances Fisher joined TerraWolt Pvt. Ltd. as a DevSecOps engineer in 2020. On February 1,
2022, his organization became a victim of cyber security attack. The attacker targeted the network and application vulnerabilities and compromised some important functionality of the application. To secure the organization against similar types of attacks, Franches used a flexible, accurate, low maintenance vulnerability management and assessment solution that continuously scans the network and application vulnerabilities and provides daily updates and specialized testing methodologies to catch maximum detectable vulnerabilities. Based on the above- mentioned information, which of the following tools is Frances using?

Answer: D

Explanation:
BeSECURE is a vulnerability management and assessment solution designed for continuous scanning of both network and application vulnerabilities. It emphasizes flexibility, accuracy, low maintenance overhead, and frequent updates to vulnerability detection mechanisms. These characteristics align directly with the scenario described, where the organization requires continuous scanning, daily updates, and specialized testing methodologies to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. SonarQube focuses on static code quality and security analysis during development, Black Duck is primarily used for open-source software composition analysis, and Shadow Daemon is a web application firewall rather than a comprehensive vulnerability management solution. Using BeSECURE during the Operate and Monitor stage allows organizations to maintain ongoing visibility into their security posture, detect new vulnerabilities as they emerge, and reduce the likelihood of repeat attacks by addressing weaknesses proactively.


NEW QUESTION # 149
William McDougall has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company located in Sacramento, California. His organization has been using Microsoft Azure DevOps service to develop software products securely and quickly. To take proactive decisions related to security issues and to reduce the overall security risk, William would like to integrate ThreatModeler with Azure Pipelines. How can ThreatModeler be integrated with Azure Pipelines and made a part of William's organization DevSecOps pipeline?

Answer: D

Explanation:
ThreatModeler integration with Azure Pipelines is achieved using a bidirectional API, which allows automated and continuous interaction between the pipeline and the threat modeling platform.
This bidirectional communication enables Azure Pipelines to trigger threat modeling activities while also receiving results, risk scores, and actionable insights back from ThreatModeler. Such feedback loops are critical for proactive security decision-making during the Plan stage of DevSecOps. Unidirectional APIs or UI-based integrations limit automation and do not support continuous feedback, making them unsuitable for pipeline-driven workflows. UI-based approaches also introduce manual steps, which conflict with DevSecOps principles of automation and consistency. By using a bidirectional API, William's organization can embed threat modeling into the planning process, identify architectural risks early, and ensure security considerations are continuously enforced as part of the pipeline.


NEW QUESTION # 150
Alex Hales recently joined TAVR Software Solution Pvt. Ltd. As a DevSecOps engineer. To automatically detect security loopholes in the web applications while building and testing them, he integrated OWASP ZAP DAST Plugin with Jenkins. How can Alex uniquely identify every build in the project?

Answer: D

Explanation:
Jenkins automatically assigns a unique identifier to each build using the environment variable BUILD_ID. When integrating OWASP ZAP with Jenkins, appending ${BUILD_ID} to output filenames or reports ensures that every scan result corresponds to a specific build execution. This avoids overwriting previous reports and allows traceability between build artifacts and security findings. Variables such as ${ZAPROXY_HOME} refer to installation paths, not build uniqueness, while ${Profile_ID} and ${zap_scan} are not standard Jenkins variables for uniquely identifying builds. Using ${BUILD_ID} supports better auditing, historical analysis, and correlation between detected vulnerabilities and the exact build in which they were found, which is critical during the Build and Test stage of a DevSecOps pipeline.


NEW QUESTION # 151
......

New 312-97 Braindumps Files: https://www.exams4sures.com/ECCouncil/312-97-practice-exam-dumps.html

P.S. Free & New 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Exams4sures: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OuWJKe4gp1mhIJWE292Cd5bVrs0jvshk