Übrigens, Sie können die vollständige Version der EchteFrage Mule-Arch-201 Prüfungsfragen aus dem Cloud-Speicher herunterladen: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LIsMSAQyLepfN2J16QBpCmlHSm3po43M
In den letzten Jahren entwickelt sich die IT-Branche sehr schnell. Viele Leute fangen an, IT-Kenntnisse zu lernen. Sie geben viel Mühe aus, um eine bessere Zukunft zu haben. Die Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine unentbehrliche Zertifizierungsprüfung in der IT-Branche. Viele Leute machen sich große Sorgen um die Prüfung. Heute empfehle ich Ihnen einen gute Methode, nämlich, die Fragenkataloge zur Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung von EchteFrage zu kaufen. Sie können Ihnen helfen, die Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung 100% zu bestehen. Sonst geben wir Ihnen eine volle Rückerstattung. Und Sie würden keine Verluste erleiden.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Deploying API Implementations to CloudHub | 11% | - CloudHub 2.0 & Runtime Fabric - Deployment Strategies - CloudHub Architecture |
| Topic 2: Managing APIs | 12% | - API Lifecycle Management - API Versioning - API Security (Policies, SLAs) |
| Topic 3: Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks | 8% | - Alerting & Auditing - Analytics & Business Insights - Anypoint Monitoring Tools |
| Topic 4: Understanding the MuleSoft Platform & Application Networks | 11% | - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Core Concepts - C4E (Center for Enablement) Definition - Application Network Fundamentals |
| Topic 5: Applying Integration Patterns | 11% | - Integration Scenarios & Patterns - Batch Processing - Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) |
| Topic 6: Meeting API Quality Goals | 8% | - API Performance Optimization - Resilience & Reliability Patterns - Unit & Integration Testing |
| Topic 7: Architecting and Deploying API Implementations | 11% | - Disaster Recovery (DR) Strategies - Mule Runtime Architecture - High Availability (HA) Design |
| Topic 8: Designing and Sharing APIs | 11% | - API Design Best Practices - Anypoint Exchange for Sharing Assets - API-Led Connectivity Approach |
| Topic 9: Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations | 17% | - Governance and Compliance Framework - IT Delivery & C4E Operating Model - Platform Foundation Setup |
Mit den Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung von EchteFrage würden Sie eine glänzende Zukunft haben und Erfolg erzielen. Sie werden Sie nicht nur zum Erfolg führen, sondern auch Ihre Fähigkeiten in der IT-Branche effizient entfalten. Sie umfassen zahlreiche Wissensgebiete und können Ihre Kenntnisse verbessern. Wenn Sie noch warten oder zögern, denn Sie wissen nicht, wie man die Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen kann, keine Sorge. Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zertifizierungsprüfung von EchteFrage wird alle Ihren Probleme lösen.
125. Frage
An organization has created an API-led architecture that uses various API layers to integrate mobile clients with a backend system. The backend system consists of a number of specialized components and can be accessed via a REST API. The process and experience APIs share the same bounded-context model that is different from the backend data model. What additional canonical models, bounded-context models, or anti-corruption layers are best added to this architecture to help process data consumed from the backend system?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Correct Answe r: Create a bounded-context model for the system layer to closely match the backend data model, and add an anti-corruption layer to let the different bounded contexts cooperate across the system and process layers
*****************************************
>> Canonical models are not an option here as the organization has already put in efforts and created bounded-context models for Experience and Process APIs.
>> Anti-corruption layers for ALL APIs is unnecessary and invalid because it is mentioned that experience and process APIs share same bounded-context model. It is just the System layer APIs that need to choose their approach now.
>> So, having an anti-corruption layer just between the process and system layers will work well. Also to speed up the approach, system APIs can mimic the backend system data model.
126. Frage
Say, there is a legacy CRM system called CRM-Z which is offering below functions:
1. Customer creation
2. Amend details of an existing customer
3. Retrieve details of a customer
4. Suspend a customer
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Correct Answe r: Implement different system APIs named createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has seperation of concerns
*****************************************
>> It is quite normal to have a single API and different Verb + Resource combinations. However, this fits well for an Experience API or a Process API but not a best architecture style for System APIs. So, option with just one customerManagement API is not the best choice here.
>> The option with APIs in createCustomerInCRMZ format is next close choice w.r.t modularization and less maintenance but the naming of APIs is directly coupled with the legacy system. A better foreseen approach would be to name your APIs by abstracting the backend system names as it allows seamless replacement/migration of any backend system anytime. So, this is not the correct choice too.
>> createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer is the right approach and is the best fit compared to other options as they are both modular and same time got the names decoupled from backend system and it has covered all requirements a System API needs.
127. Frage
An organization is implementing a Quote of the Day API that caches today's quote.
What scenario can use the GoudHub Object Store via the Object Store connector to persist the cache's state?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Correct Answe r: When there is one CloudHub deployment of the API implementation to three CloudHub workers that must share the cache state.
*****************************************
Key details in the scenario:
>> Use the CloudHub Object Store via the Object Store connector
Considering above details:
>> CloudHub Object Stores have one-to-one relationship with CloudHub Mule Applications.
>> We CANNOT use an application's CloudHub Object Store to be shared among multiple Mule applications running in different Regions or Business Groups or Customer-hosted Mule Runtimes by using Object Store connector.
>> If it is really necessary and very badly needed, then Anypoint Platform supports a way by allowing access to CloudHub Object Store of another application using Object Store REST API. But NOT using Object Store connector.
So, the only scenario where we can use the CloudHub Object Store via the Object Store connector to persist the cache's state is when there is one CloudHub deployment of the API implementation to multiple CloudHub workers that must share the cache state.
128. Frage
A Mule application exposes an HTTPS endpoint and is deployed to three CloudHub workers that do not use static IP addresses. The Mule application expects a high volume of client requests in short time periods. What is the most cost-effective infrastructure component that should be used to serve the high volume of client requests?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Correct Answe r: The CloudHub shared load balancer
*****************************************
The scenario in this question can be split as below:
>> There are 3 CloudHub workers (So, there are already good number of workers to handle high volume of requests)
>> The workers are not using static IP addresses (So, one CANNOT use customer load-balancing solutions without static IPs)
>> Looking for most cost-effective component to load balance the client requests among the workers.
Based on the above details given in the scenario:
>> Runtime autoscaling is NOT at all cost-effective as it incurs extra cost. Most over, there are already 3 workers running which is a good number.
>> We cannot go for a customer-hosted load balancer as it is also NOT most cost-effective (needs custom load balancer to maintain and licensing) and same time the Mule App is not having Static IP Addresses which limits from going with custom load balancing.
>> An API Proxy is irrelevant there as it has no role to play w.r.t handling high volumes or load balancing.
So, the only right option to go with and fits the purpose of scenario being most cost-effective is - using a CloudHub Shared Load Balancer.
129. Frage
What API policy would be LEAST LIKELY used when designing an Experience API that is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Correct Answe r: IP whitelist
*****************************************
>> OAuth 2.0 access token and Client ID enforcement policies are VERY common to apply on Experience APIs as API consumers need to register and access the APIs using one of these mechanisms
>> JSON threat protection is also VERY common policy to apply on Experience APIs to prevent bad or suspicious payloads hitting the API implementations.
>> IP whitelisting policy is usually very common in Process and System APIs to only whitelist the IP range inside the local VPC. But also applied occassionally on some experience APIs where the End User/ API Consumers are FIXED.
>> When we know the API consumers upfront who are going to access certain Experience APIs, then we can request for static IPs from such consumers and whitelist them to prevent anyone else hitting the API.
However, the experience API given in the question/ scenario is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application. Which means, there is no way we can know all possible IPs that are to be whitelisted as mobile phones and tablets can so many in number and any device in the city/state/country/globe.
So, It is very LEAST LIKELY to apply IP Whitelisting on such Experience APIs whose consumers are typically Mobile Phones or Tablets.
130. Frage
......
Wollen Sie, ein ITer, durch den Erfolg zu IT-Zertifizierungsprüfungen Ihre Fähigkeit beweisen? Und heute besitzen immer mehr Ihre Freuden und Kommilitonen die IT-Zertifizierungen. Und in diesem Fall können Sie weniger Chancen haben, wenn Sie keine Zertifizierung haben. Und haben Sie sich entschieden, welche Prüfung abzulegen? Wie sind Salesforce Prüfungen? Oder Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zeritifizierungsprüfung? Salesforce Mule-Arch-201 Zeritifizierungsprüfung ist wertvoll und hilft Ihnen unbedingt, Ihren Wunsch zu erreichen.
Mule-Arch-201 Testantworten: https://www.echtefrage.top/Mule-Arch-201-deutsch-pruefungen.html
BONUS!!! Laden Sie die vollständige Version der EchteFrage Mule-Arch-201 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LIsMSAQyLepfN2J16QBpCmlHSm3po43M