さらに、It-Passports OGEA-103ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nltqR8laLL573dDeoyiHAKnQEZaT5Xkr
最新のThe Open Group OGEA-103スタディガイドが作成されていることをご注意ください。 これらの試験教材は高い合格率です。 OGEA-103学習ガイドは、今後の試験に最適な支援になると確信しています。 「ノーパス全額返金」を保証します。 過去の失敗について落ち込んでいて、有効なOGEA-103学習ガイドを探したいと思う場合は、間違いなく100％合格として試験資料に返信することをお勧めします。 私たちのOGEA-103学習ガイドに対する何千もの候補者の選択があなたの賢明な決定です。
| Certification Vendor: | The Open Group |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam |
| Exam Number: | OGEA-103 |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Exam Price: | Approx. 495 USD (varies by region and test provider) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 48 (approx. 40 Part 1 + 8 Part 2 scenario-based) |
| Certificate Validity Period: | No expiration (TOGAF certification is generally non-expiring) |
| Related Certifications: | TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 (Certified) TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 1 (Foundation) |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based complex questions (Part 2), Multiple choice questions (Part 1) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 60% overall; both Part 1 and Part 2 sections must be passed |
| Recommended Training: | The Open Group Accredited Training Courses TOGAF Standard Official Documentation |
| Exam Registration: | Pearson VUE TOGAF Exams The Open Group Certification Portal |
| Sample Questions: | The Open Group OGEA-103 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based exam delivered via Pearson VUE test centers or online proctored exam |
| Pre Condition: | No formal prerequisites required, but familiarity with enterprise architecture concepts is recommended. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.opengroup.org/certifications/togaf |
私たちは、It-PassportsのThe Open GroupのOGEA-103問題集を使ったら、初めて認定試験を受ける君でも一回で試験に合格することができるということを保証します。もし認定試験に失敗したら、或いは学習教材は問題があれば、私たちは全額返金することを保証いたします。そして、It-PassportsのThe Open GroupのOGEA-103問題集を購入したら、私たちは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。
OGEA-103試験は、TOGAFフレームワークを使用してエンタープライズアーキテクチャの分野で知識と専門知識を実証したい個人向けに設計されています。これは、既にTOGAFパート1およびパート2コースを完了しており、より効率的な方法で認定を取得することを目指している人を対象としています。この試験では、ADM（アーキテクチャ開発方法）、TOGAFリファレンスモデル、アーキテクチャコンテンツフレームワークなど、TOGAF認定のパート1とパート2の両方のトピックをすべてカバーしています。
質問 # 88
Which of the following is a responsibility of an Architecture Board?
正解：C
解説：
An Architecture Board is an executive-level group responsible for the review and maintenance of the strategic architecture and all of its sub-architectures1. It is a key element in a successful Architecture Governance strategy2.
An Architecture Board is typically made responsible, and accountable, for achieving some or all of the following goals2:
Providing the basis for all decision-making with regard to the architectures Consistency between sub-architectures Establishing targets for re-use of components Flexibility of the Enterprise Architecture: To meet changing business needs To leverage new technologies Enforcement of Architecture Compliance Improving the maturity level of architecture discipline within the organization Ensuring that the discipline of architecture-based development is adopted Supporting a visible escalation capability for out-of-bounds decisions Therefore, the correct answer is option D, which captures one of the goals of an Architecture Board as stated in the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.22.
Option A is incorrect, because conducting assessments of the maturity level of architecture discipline within the organization is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Capability Framework3.
Option B is incorrect, because allocating resources for architecture projects is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Governance Framework4.
Option C is incorrect, because creating the Statement of Architecture Work is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Development Method5.
Reference:
1: Architecture Board - The Open Group3
2: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Board
3: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Capability Framework
4: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Governance Framework
5: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part II: Architecture Development Method - Phase A: Architecture Vision
質問 # 89
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as the Chief Enterprise Architect within a law firm specializing in personal injury cases.
Many of the firm's competitors have improved their litigation strategies, and efficiency by streamlining their processes using Artificial Intelligence {Al).
The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to examine the use of Machine Learning in defining a new Al-driven litigation and finance process for the firm. This process would instruct the lawyers and analysts as to what tasks and portfolio they should work on. The key objectives are to increase task profitability, maximize staff utilization, and increase individual profitability.
The CIO has emphasized that the architecture should enable the fast implementation of continuous Machine Learning. The solution will need to be constantly measured for delivered value and be quickly iterated to success.
Some of the partners have expressed concerns about letting the Al make the decisions, others about the risks associated with use of it for the type of service they deliver. The CIO wants to know if these concerns can be addressed, and how risks will be covered by a new architecture enabling Al and Machine Learning.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to respond to the CIO recommending an approach that would enable the development of an architecture that addresses the concerns of the CIO and the concerns of the partners.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
正解：C
解説：
A Stakeholder Map is a technique that can be used to identify and classify the stakeholders of the architecture work, and to document their key interests, requirements, and concerns. A stakeholder is any person, group, or organization that has a stake in the outcome of the architecture work, such as the sponsor, the client, the users, the suppliers, the regulators, or the competitors. A Stakeholder Map can help to understand the needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and to communicate and engage with them effectively1 The steps for creating a Stakeholder Map are:
* Identify the stakeholders of the architecture work, using various sources and methods, such as interviews, surveys, workshops, or existing documents.
* Classify the stakeholders according to their roles, responsibilities, and relationships, using various criteria and dimensions, such as power, influence, interest, attitude, or impact.
* Define the concerns and relevant views for each stakeholder group, using various techniques, such as business scenarios, use cases, or value propositions. A concern is a key interest or issue that is relevant to the stakeholder, such as a goal, a problem, a need, or a risk. A view is a representation of the system of interest from the perspective of one or more stakeholders and their concerns.
* Record the stakeholders and their concerns in a Stakeholder Map, which shows the mapping between the stakeholder groups, the concerns, and the views. The Stakeholder Map also shows the dependencies, assumptions, and issues related to each stakeholder and concern.
Therefore, the best answer is B, because it recommends the approach that would enable the development of an architecture that addresses the concerns of the CIO and the partners, using the Stakeholder Map technique. The answer covers the following aspects:
* An analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken, which involves identifying, classifying, and defining the stakeholders and their concerns.
* The stakeholders and their concerns are documented in a Stakeholder Map, which provides a clear and comprehensive picture of the stakeholder landscape and their interests.
* The concerns and relevant views are recorded in the Architecture Vision document, which is the output
* of Phase A: Architecture Vision of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture. The Architecture Vision defines the scope and approach of the architecture work, and establishes the business goals and drivers that motivate the architecture work. The Architecture Vision also involves obtaining the approval and commitment of the sponsors and other key stakeholders, and initiating the Architecture Governance process2
* The requirements include risk mitigation through regular assessments, which involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks that may affect the architecture, and determining the appropriate measures or actions to prevent, reduce, or mitigate the risks. Risk mitigation can also involve monitoring and reviewing the risk situation, and communicating and reporting the risk status and actions3
* This approach also allows a supervised agile implementation of the continuous Machine Learning, which involves applying agile principles and practices to the architecture development and implementation, such as iterative and incremental delivery, frequent feedback, collaboration, and adaptation. A supervised agile implementation can help to ensure the quality, value, and alignment of the architecture, and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of the stakeholders.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 24:
Stakeholder Management 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 18: Phase A: Architecture Vision 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 32: Risk Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III:
ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 29: Applying Iteration to the ADM
質問 # 90
Refer to the table below:
Which ADM Phase does this describe?
正解：D
解説：
Explanation
Phase B of the ADM cycle is the Business Architecture phase. It describes the development of a Business Architecture to support an agreed Architecture Vision. The objectives of this phase are to describe the baseline and target Business Architecture, identify candidate Architecture Roadmap components based on gaps between the baseline and target, and determine whether an incremental approach is required. Reference: The TOGAF Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.2.2 Phase B: Business Architecture.
質問 # 91
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within a healthcare and life science company. The company is a leading player in its industry, dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF Standard. In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management frameworks in use.
The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company.
Many of the company's rivals have begun utilizing Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current role?
How Al can enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How Al can offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals.
Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.
The CIO wants to know how to address these concerns and reduce risks.
Refer to the scenario
You have been tasked with starting the architecture development. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
正解：B
解説：
Key aspects of the scenario:
Objective:
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare delivery, with a focus on improving patient care, enhancing workplace efficiency, and enabling seamless experiences.
Challenges:
Stakeholder concerns about risk management, adaptability to change, and ensuring alignment with regulations and policies.
Addressing the concerns of staff and top management about AI integration and achieving the desired goals.
CIO's Perspective:
Encouraging an agile approach to architecture development.
Addressing risks and ensuring stakeholder concerns are managed.
Areas for Evaluation:
AI usage by staff and impact on workflows.
Patient experience enhancement via AI.
New workplace platforms and tools powered by AI.
Option Analysis:
Option 1: Analysis of stakeholders and development of a Stakeholder Map Pros:
Stakeholder analysis is critical for identifying concerns, viewpoints, and requirements.
TOGAF emphasizes stakeholder engagement early in the process to mitigate risks and align expectations.
Developing a Stakeholder Map ensures clear alignment with their interests and creates a foundation for regular feedback loops.
Cons:
Does not explicitly address the creation of architecture models or policies upfront.
Option 2: Creation of a Communications Plan
Pros:
A communications plan fosters effective stakeholder engagement by addressing their concerns and ensuring transparent reporting.
Risk mitigation as part of communication aligns with TOGAF's stakeholder management practices.
Cons:
This focuses more on communication mechanics rather than advancing architectural development directly.
Option 3: Models for Draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology Architectures Pros:
Aligns with the Architecture Development Method (ADM), ensuring compliance with requirements and regulations.
Helps formalize stakeholder feedback by verifying their concerns against tangible models.
Cons:
Developing detailed models early on may delay immediate resolution of stakeholder concerns and risk mitigation.
Option 4: Set of reusable business models for AI-related projects
Pros:
Standardized models ensure consistency and portability across the organization's AI-related efforts.
Cons:
Too narrow in focus for the initial architecture development phase; does not address risk management or stakeholder concerns adequately.
Recommended Answe r :
Option 1: You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken.
Reasoning:
The scenario highlights stakeholder concerns about risks, adaptability, and compliance. Addressing these concerns requires stakeholder analysis as the first step.
A Stakeholder Map aligns with TOGAF's emphasis on stakeholder engagement, providing a structured way to manage their concerns and expectations.
Identifying concerns early and integrating feedback into the Architecture Vision document ensures alignment with goals and smooth progress.
Option 1 sets the foundation for collaboration and risk management, making it the best fit for the current phase.
質問 # 92
In the ADM, what is the name for a document deliverable that has completed a review and is approved?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
In the TOGAF ADM, deliverables go through a lifecycle of development, review, approval, and usage.
TOGAF distinguishes between draft deliverables (work-in-progress) and final deliverables (those that have been formally reviewed and signed off).
Draft deliverables are produced as working versions of the required outputs in each ADM phase. These may carry version labels such as 0.1, 0.5, 0.9, etc., and are subject to stakeholder review and refinement.
Once the document has been reviewed and approved by the relevant stakeholders (e.g., Architecture Board, governance bodies), it becomes a final deliverable.
Final deliverables are baseline-controlled items and are formally stored in the Architecture Repository as an approved architecture artifact.
Thus, the correct term for a deliverable that has completed review and is approved is "final".
Why the other options are incorrect
B). Approved: While true in general language, TOGAF uses the formal term "final deliverable", not "approved deliverable." C). Ratified: This term is not used in TOGAF to describe the state of a deliverable.
D). Version 0.9: This is a draft numbering convention, not the status of an approved deliverable.
References
The Open Group, TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: ADM - description of deliverables, artifacts, and building blocks.
The Open Group, TOGAF 9 Certified Study Guide - explanation of draft vs. final deliverables in the ADM lifecycle.
質問 # 93
......
OGEA-103過去問: https://www.it-passports.com/OGEA-103.html
ちなみに、It-Passports OGEA-103の一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nltqR8laLL573dDeoyiHAKnQEZaT5Xkr