100% Garantie für 156-590 Zertifizierung Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) Prüfungserfolg. Wenn Sie It-Pruefung 156-590 Prüfung CheckPoint wählen, ist It-Pruefung Test Engine das perfekte Werkzeug, mit dem Sie sich besser auf die Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten. Erfolg kommt einfach, wenn Sie mit Hilfe 156-590 Dumps (Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS)) von It-Pruefung nutzen. Falls Sie in der Prüfung durchfallen, geben wir Ihnen eine volle Rückerstattung Ihres Einkaufs.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus | 15% | - Bot detection mechanisms - Bot and malware signature updates - Configuring Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus policies - Anti-Virus scanning methods (streamed vs. traditional) |
| Topic 2: Threat Extraction | 10% | - Threat Extraction policy configuration - Threat Extraction (Sanboxing) concepts - PDF, Office document, and archive sanitization |
| Topic 3: Threat Emulation (SandBlast) | 15% | - Threat Emulation policy configuration - Threat Emulation architecture and deployment - Zero-day threat protection - File emulation process and verdicts |
| Topic 4: Threat Prevention Overview and Architecture | 10% | - Check Point Threat Prevention solution overview - Security Gateway integration with Threat Prevention - Threat Prevention architecture and components |
| Topic 5: IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) | 20% | - IPS signatures and protections - IPS architecture and deployment modes - IPS policy configuration and tuning - IPS logging and alerts - IPS exceptions and whitelisting |
| Topic 6: Threat Prevention Policy | 20% | - Creating and configuring Threat Prevention profiles - Threat Prevention action settings - Applying Threat Prevention policy layers - Profile-based vs. rule-based configurations |
| Topic 7: Threat Prevention Dashboard and Monitoring | 10% | - Threat Prevention statistics and trends - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues - Using SmartConsole for monitoring - Threat Prevention logs and reporting |
Wenn Sie IT-Industrie auswählen, wählen Sie nämlich die gutbezahlte Arbeit und bessere Aussichten. Deshalb wollen immer mehr Leute das IT-Zertifikat besitzen. Und heute nehmen immer mehr Leute an CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung teil. Und wir It-Pruefung bieten Kadidaten die echten Prüfungsfragen und -antworten mit günstigen Preisen und höher Qualität. Und Wir It-Pruefung bieten Ihnen einjährigen kostlosen Aktualisierungsservice. Und unsere 156-590 Prüfungsunterlagen sind schon bereit. Wir It-Pruefung sind der führende Lieferant der Prüfungsunterlagen. Wir haben die neuesten und die richtigsten CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsunterlagen, nämlich die Prüfungsfragen und die Testantworten.
41. Frage
Task: Configure protections against known CVEs.
Antwort:
Begründung:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Filter IPS Protections by CVE number (e.g., CVE-2023-XXXX).
2- Confirm CVE protection is available and enabled.
3- Set action to "Prevent."
4- Link it to custom profile.
5- Test and validate using test exploit traffic or logs.
42. Frage
What is the action for newly updated protections which is set in Staging Mode?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
The correct answer is A. Detect . IPS Staging Mode is designed to introduce newly updated protections safely by observing their effect before enforcing active prevention. Check Point documentation states that when newly updated protections are set to Staging Mode , they remain in staging until the administrator changes their configuration. The default action for protections in staging mode is Detect , and this can be changed manually in the IPS Protections page. The R81.20 guide states the same behavior: newly updated protections in staging mode remain there until changed, and their default action is Detect.
This behavior is important during IPS lifecycle management because new signatures can introduce unexpected matches in production traffic. Detect mode allows the gateway to log and expose what the protection would have matched while avoiding immediate blocking. That gives administrators time to validate logs, tune exceptions, confirm confidence level, and assess business impact before switching to Prevent.
Bypass would skip inspection and is not the staging default. None is not the default action. Prevent may be the final desired enforcement state, but staging intentionally avoids immediate prevention until analysis is complete. Reference topics: IPS Updates Policy, Staging Mode, Newly Updated Protections, Detect action, IPS protection rollout.
43. Frage
How are SNORT rules constructed?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
The correct answer is D. The rule is contained on a single line. There are two logical sections: Rule Header and Rule Options . SNORT signatures are supported in Check Point Threat Prevention as custom IPS-style protections, and their structure follows the standard SNORT rule model. Official Snort documentation states that the rule header includes the text before the first parenthesis, while the body contains the rule options between parentheses. It also shows a complete rule with header and option definitions. The classic Snort rule reference describes the two logical sections as the rule header and rule options .
In the exam wording, the expected construction is a single-line rule composed of these two logical sections.
The header defines the coarse traffic selector and action, such as alert/drop, protocol, source, destination, ports, and direction. The options define the detailed detection logic, such as message, content match, flow, metadata, and signature identifier. "Payload" is not the correct formal name for the second logical section, which eliminates options A and C. Option B uses the correct logical sections but incorrectly states that the rule is contained on two lines. Reference topics: SNORT Signature Support, custom IPS protections, Rule Header, Rule Options, signature syntax.
44. Frage
What is the recommended setting for Anti-Virus and why?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
The correct answer is D. Background because it inspects a large subset of traffic . Anti-Virus is a pre- infection Threat Prevention blade that can inspect broad user traffic categories, including web and file-transfer flows. Because the inspection scope can be large, the selected enforcement behavior directly affects latency, user experience, and gateway resource consumption. Check Point documentation identifies Anti-Virus as a blade that scans protocols such as HTTP/HTTPS, FTP, SMB, and mail-related traffic depending on configuration, with additional protocol support documented for IMAP and POP3.
The Background setting is recommended in this context because it avoids unnecessarily holding a large volume of traffic while inspection continues. Hold mode is stricter because it delays delivery until inspection completes or a timeout condition is reached, but that strictness can introduce user-facing delay when applied broadly. Option A is incorrect because Anti-Virus is not post-infection; it prevents malware before user impact. Options B and C are incorrect because they associate Hold mode with a limited inspection scope, while Anti-Virus commonly applies to a large and performance-sensitive traffic set. Reference topics: Anti- Virus Settings, protocol inspection scope, Background versus Hold behavior, performance impact, pre- infection prevention.
45. Frage
Which of the following is NOT a valid Blade bundle?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
The correct answer is B. Next Generation Full Protection . Check Point's documented security subscription package families include NGFW , NGTP , and SNBT/SandBlast . Check Point's 3600 Security Gateway datasheet explicitly lists NGFW , NGTP , and SNBT (SandBlast) as all-inclusive security package columns.
The Network Security Software Bundles datasheet also presents the same package structure: NGFW as the base Next Generation Firewall bundle, NGTP as the Next-Gen Threat Prevention package, and SNBT as the SandBlast package that includes NGTP and adds zero-day protection capabilities.
Therefore, Next Generation Firewall , Next Generation Threat Prevention , and SandBlast are valid Check Point blade bundle names in this context. Next Generation Full Protection is not the documented bundle name. It may sound plausible because it describes a comprehensive security posture, but certification questions require exact product and package terminology. In Check Point licensing and subscription design, using the correct bundle name matters because each package maps to a defined set of Software Blades and subscription entitlements. NGFW provides the base firewall/IPS access-control package, NGTP adds known- threat prevention, and SNBT adds advanced SandBlast zero-day protections such as Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, and Zero Phishing. Reference topics: Check Point Software Blade bundles, NGFW, NGTP, SNBT
/SandBlast, package entitlement mapping.
46. Frage
......
Um die CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen, brauchen Sie eine ausreichende Vorbereitung und eine vollständige Wissensstruktur. Die von It-Pruefung gebotenen CheckPoint 156-590 Ressourcen würden Ihre Bedürfnisse sicher abdecken.
156-590 Online Test: https://www.it-pruefung.com/156-590.html