2026 Latest Prep4away Plat-Arch-204 PDF Dumps and Plat-Arch-204 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sfzcwoRXU-YHYyPxdc4J9G6rGVciz1Ev
If you have the certification the exam, you can enter a better company, and your salary will also be doubled. Plat-Arch-204 training materials can help you pass the exam and obtain corresponding certification successfully. Plat-Arch-204 exam materials are edited by experienced experts, and they possess the professional knowledge for the exam, and you can use it with ease. We have online and offline chat service, they possess the professional knowledge for the exam, and you can consult them any questions that bothers you. We offer you free update for one year for Plat-Arch-204 Exam Dumps, and our system will send the latest version to you automatically.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice, Multiple-select |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce B2C Solution Architect Salesforce System Architect |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
>> Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator <<
When you grasp the key points to attend the Plat-Arch-204 exam, nothing will be difficult for you anymore. Our professional experts are good at compiling the Plat-Arch-204 training guide with the most important information. They have been in this career for over ten years, and they know every detail about the Plat-Arch-204 Exam no matter on the content but also on the displays. Believe in our Plat-Arch-204 practice braindumps, and your success is 100% guaranteed!
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 77
A company's cloud-based single page application consolidates data local to the application with data from on-premise and Third-party systems. The diagram below typifies the application's combined use of synchronous and asynchronous calls. The company wants to use the average response time of its application's user interface as a basis for certain alerts. For this purpose, the following occurs:
Log every call start and finish date and time to a central analytics data store.
Compute response time uniformly as the difference between the start and finish date and time (A to H in the diagram).
Which computation represents the end-to-end response time from the user's perspective?
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 78
Universal Containers (UC) is a global financial company. UC support agents would like to open bank accounts on the spot for customers who inquire about UC products. During the bank account opening process, the agents execute credit checks for the customers through external agencies. At any given time, up to 30 concurrent reps will be using the service to perform credit checks for customers. Which error handling mechanisms should be built to display an error to the agent when the credit verification process has failed?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a synchronous Request-Reply integration-where a bank agent is waiting for a real-time credit check to open an account-the error handling strategy must balance user experience with system resilience. Handling these errors at the Middleware layer is the architecturally preferred solution for managing complex retry logic and providing a clean response to Salesforce.
If the external credit agency's service is momentarily unavailable, the middleware (such as an ESB or MuleSoft) can automatically retry the request multiple times using a pre-defined strategy (e.g., exponential backoff). This "self-healing" behavior can often resolve transient network issues before the Salesforce agent even realizes there was a problem. If the retries fail, the middleware then returns a structured error message to Salesforce, which is displayed to the agent via the UI.
Option B (Fire and Forget) is unsuitable for this use case because the agent needs the result immediately to proceed with the bank account opening; they cannot afford to wait for a background process to finish hours later. Option C (Mock Service) is a testing tool and has no place in a production environment where real financial decisions are being made. By delegating error management to the middleware, UC ensures that its Salesforce instance remains performant (avoiding long-running request timeo1112uts) while maximizing the chances of a successful credit check through automated, controlled retries.1314
NEW QUESTION # 79
Northern Trail Outfitters has recently implemented middleware for orchestration of services across platforms. The Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system being used requires transactions be captured near real-time at a REST endpoint initiated in Salesforce when creating an Order object. Additionally, the Salesforce team has limited development resources and requires a low-code solution. Which option should fulfill the use case requirements?12
Answer: B
Explanation:
To satisfy a requirement for near real-time updates to an ERP system while adher9ing to a low-code constraint, the architect must leverage Salesforce's modern declara10tive automation tools. The goal is to initiate an outbound signal that the existing middleware can then orchestrate and deliver to the ERP's REST endpoint.
The Remote Process Invocation-Fire and Forget pattern is perfectly suited for this scenario. In this pattern, Salesforce sends a message to an external system and does not wait for a functional response. This is ideal for "capturing" transactions in an ERP where the primary goal is record synchronization rather than a real-time calculation return. By using Flow Builder, the team can implement a record-triggered flow on the Order object. This flow can be configured to execute "Actions" that send data to the middleware via External Services or standard HTTP Callouts (Beta/GA features in modern Flow), which requires zero Apex coding.
Option B, Outbound Messaging, is a legacy declarative tool that is highly reliable but has a significant limitation: it natively sends messages in SOAP format. Since the requirement specifically specifies a REST endpoint, using Outbound Messaging would require additional transformation logic in the middleware, making it a less direct architectural fit than a modern Flow-based REST call. Option C, Change Data Capture (CDC), is a highly scalable, event-driven mechanism, but it is typically considered more complex to implement and maintain. It requires the middleware to manage "Replay IDs" and subscribe to a streaming channel, which often requires more specialized development effort on the middleware side compared to a simple HTTP POST from a Flow. For a team with limited development resources, Flow Builder provides the most accessible and maintainable path to achieving near real-time integration.
NEW QUESTION # 80
An integration architect needs to build a solution that will use the Streaming API, but the data loss should be minimized, even when the client re-connects every couple of days. Which two types of Streaming API events should be considered?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a robust event-driven architecture, "durability" is the ability of a system to retain events so that a subscriber can retrieve them even after being offline. For an architect needing to minimize data loss over "every couple of days," the selection must focus on event types that support a high retention window.
Salesforce provides two modern event types specifically designed for high-scale, durable messaging:
Change Data Capture (CDC): This automatically broadcasts changes to Salesforce records (Create, Update, Delete, Undelete). CDC events are highly durable and are retained in the event bus for 72 hours (3 days).
High-Volume Platform Events: These are custom events defined by the architect. Like CDC, High-Volume Platform Events also provide a 72-hour retention window.
Earlier versions of the Streaming API, such as PushTopic Events and Generic Events (Option C and parts of A), typically offered a 24-hour retention window, which would not satisfy the requirement of a client re-connecting "every couple of days" (potentially 48-72 hours later).
By utilizing CDC and High-Volume Platform Events, the architect can leverage the Replay ID. When the client re-connects, it can send the Replay ID of the last event it successfully processed. Salesforce then "replays" all events that occurred during the client's downtime from that specific point, up to the 72-hour limit. This mechanism ensures zero data loss for planned or unplanned outages lasting up to three days, making it the most resilient choice for the specified requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 81
An architect decided to use Platform Events for integrating Salesforce with an external system for a company. What should an architect consider when proposing this type of integration mechanism?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When proposing Platform Events as an integration mechanism, an architect must ensure that the security model is correctly configured to allow for the publication and subscription of events. Unlike standard objects, Platform Events have specific permission requirements for the "Integration User" or any system entity interacting with the event bus.
For an external system to subscribe to a Platform Event stream (via CometD or the Pub/Sub API), the user account used to authenticate the connection must have the "Read" permission on the specific Platform Event entity. Similarly, if the external system needs to publish events back into Salesforce, the user must have "Create" permissions. These permissions are typically managed through a Profile or a Permission Set assigned to the Integration User.
Regarding the other options, Option A is incorrect because Platform Events are designed for asynchronous communication. They are inherently decoupled; the external system does not need the same uptime as Salesforce. High-volume platform events are stored in the event bus for 72 hours, allowing an external system to "catch up" using a Replay ID once it comes back online. Option C is also incorrect because Platform Events follow a Publish/Subscribe pattern. Salesforce "broadcasts" the event to the bus without needing to know which specific external systems are listening. This decoupling is a primary advantage of event-driven architecture, as it allows for a "one-to-many" distribution model where multiple systems can consume the same message without additional configuration within Salesforce. Thus, ensuring the correct object-level permissions (Read/Create) is the most critical technical consideration for the architect to guarantee successful message delivery.
NEW QUESTION # 82
......
Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator Fee: https://www.prep4away.com/Salesforce-certification/braindumps.Plat-Arch-204.ete.file.html
P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4away: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sfzcwoRXU-YHYyPxdc4J9G6rGVciz1Ev