The Nokia 4A0-D03 exam questions were developed by ITExamDownload in three formats. If you take enough practice tests on 4A0-D03 practice exam software by ITExamDownload, you’ll be more comfortable when you walk in on Nokia exam day. So, go with 4A0-D03 Exam Questions that are prepared under the supervision of industry experts to expand your knowledge base and successfully pass the 4A0-D03 exam on the first attempt.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Center Interconnect (DCI) Solutions | 25% | - Interoperability with Nokia 7750 SR - BGP route policies and route reflectors - Gateway-less EVPN DCI |
| Layer 3 EVPN Services | 25% | - VRF integration and route targets - EVPN Route Type 5 - Symmetric and asymmetric routing |
| SR Linux and EVPN Fundamentals | 25% | - SR Linux architecture and CLI - EVPN control plane and MP-BGP - VXLAN encapsulation and underlay |
| Layer 2 EVPN Services | 25% | - EVPN Route Types 1–4 - Anycast Gateway and IRB - Multi-homing and Ethernet Segments |
>> Sample 4A0-D03 Questions Answers <<
ITExamDownload is a website you can completely believe in. In order to find more effective training materials, ITExamDownload Nokia experts have been committed to the research of Nokia certification 4A0-D03 exam, in consequence, develop many more exam materials. If you use ITExamDownload dumps once, you will also want to use it again. ITExamDownload can not only provide you with the best questions and answers, but also provide you with the most quality services. If you have any questions on our exam dumps, please to ask. Because we ITExamDownload not only guarantee all candidates can pass the 4A0-D03 Exam easily, also take the high quality, the superior service as an objective.
NEW QUESTION # 33
When configuring the EVPN MP-BGP route reflector sessions between the leaf and spine routers, which of the following statements is TRUE?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
In SR Linux BGP configuration, parameters defined at a more specific hierarchy level can override broader protocol-level settings. Therefore, if a `local-as` value is configured within the BGP group used for EVPN MP-BGP route-reflector sessions, that value overrides the AS number configured directly under the BGP protocol for that group's sessions. Option A is correct. Option B is false because the cluster ID is configured on the route reflector, not on every participating client. The cluster ID identifies the RR cluster and helps prevent route-reflection loops. Option C is false because redundant route reflectors normally operate in parallel rather than as strict primary/backup devices; clients can peer with both for resilience. Option D is misleading because EVPN route reflectors are used to avoid a full mesh of overlay MP-BGP EVPN sessions between leaves, not to replace ordinary underlay eBGP leaf-spine routing sessions. In a clean fabric design, the underlay provides IP reachability, while the EVPN overlay uses MP-BGP sessions, often via route reflectors, to distribute tenant reachability. Reference: SR Linux BGP hierarchy, EVPN route reflector sessions, local-AS override, cluster ID behavior.
NEW QUESTION # 34
Which of the following statements about PE-CE routing is FALSE?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
PE-CE routing is the mechanism used to exchange customer prefix reachability between a provider edge or data center leaf and the attached customer edge router. It can be implemented statically or dynamically. Static routing is operationally simple but does not scale well when many prefixes or frequent changes are involved. BGP is preferred for larger deployments because it supports policy, route filtering, attributes, and automated advertisement of changing reachability. In most EVPN PE-CE designs, eBGP is preferred because it creates a clean routing boundary between the PE and CE, with each device operating in a different autonomous system. Option D is false because the CE does not advertise BGP EVPN route type 5 updates to the PE. The CE advertises ordinary IPv4 or IPv6 unicast prefixes over the PE-CE routing session. The PE then imports those customer prefixes into the IP-VRF and advertises them into the EVPN overlay as route type 5 IP Prefix routes toward other PEs. This distinction matters: EVPN signaling is a PE-to-PE overlay function, not a CE-originated EVPN control-plane role. Reference: PE-CE routing, eBGP, EVPN RT-5 prefix advertisement.
NEW QUESTION # 35
When PEs are connected to an Ethernet segment with at least one active MAC-VRF, which of the following statements about the AD per EVI updates sent by a PE is FALSE?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
Ethernet Auto-Discovery per EVI routes are EVPN route type 1 advertisements used in multi-homing at the service-instance level. A PE sends an AD per EVI route for each MAC-VRF associated with the Ethernet Segment. These routes allow remote PEs to understand that the advertising PE has reachability to a given EVI through the shared ES. They are also used for aliasing and fast convergence, because a remote PE can treat multiple attached PEs as valid paths for traffic toward the same multihomed segment. In VXLAN EVPN, the update can include data-plane information such as the VNI, and it carries route-target information so the route is imported into the correct MAC-VRF. Option B is false because the multi-homing type or redundancy mode is not carried in the AD per EVI update as stated. Redundancy behavior is associated with Ethernet Segment-level signaling and configuration, especially ES discovery and related route attributes, not with AD per EVI as the mechanism that declares the multi-homing type. Reference: EVPN RT-1 AD per EVI, MAC-VRF association, route target, VNI, aliasing.
NEW QUESTION # 36
An IRB sub-interface that is being used to interconnect a MAC-VRF to an IP-VRF, is configured with anycast-gw set to true and anycast-gw enabled.
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
An anycast-gateway IRB allows multiple PEs to present the same default-gateway IP address to hosts in the same subnet. This is the mechanism that enables distributed gateway behavior in EVPN fabrics. The same anycast gateway IP may be configured on equivalent IRB subinterfaces across remote PEs participating in the same IP-VRF, allowing hosts to use the nearest leaf as their default gateway without changing their gateway address. SR Linux also associates gateway MAC information with the IRB, including virtual gateway MAC behavior used inside the MAC-VRF forwarding table. Option C is false because the anycast gateway IP is not treated as a normal unique host route that appears in the IP-VRF route table alongside the subnet prefix. The subnet route is installed for the connected network, but the shared anycast gateway address is a gateway function, not a separately advertised host endpoint that should appear as ordinary routed host reachability. Treating the anycast IP as a regular host route would undermine the distributed gateway model and create ambiguous ownership across PEs. Reference: IRB anycast gateway, MAC-VRF/IP-VRF interconnection, distributed default-gateway operation.
NEW QUESTION # 37
Leaf routers are configured to support Layer 2 multi-homing all-active mode.
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
In all-active Layer 2 EVPN multi-homing, the host is typically dual-homed to two or more leaf routers using a LAG. The participating leaf routers must configure the LAG and associate it with the Ethernet Segment so EVPN can advertise the common ESI and apply aliasing, split-horizon, and DF procedures. If VLAN tagging is used for service separation, tagging must be configured on the LAG interface so that the correct subinterfaces can bind into the MAC-VRF and Ethernet Segment. Option C is false because it states that the LACP system-id-mac must uniquely identify each leaf router. In an all-active EVPN multihomed LAG, the opposite principle applies: from the host's LACP perspective, the multihomed leaf pair must appear as a single logical LACP system. That generally requires a shared LACP system ID or coordinated system MAC behavior across the participating PEs. If each leaf presented a unique LACP system identity, the host would treat them as separate LAG partners and the all-active bundle would not form correctly. Reference: all-active L2 EVPN multi-homing, LAG attachment, LACP system ID behavior, Ethernet Segment association.
NEW QUESTION # 38
......
Getting the related 4A0-D03 certification in your field will be the most powerful way for you to show your professional knowledge and skills. However, it is not easy for the majority of candidates to prepare for the 4A0-D03 exam in order to pass it, if you are one of the candidates who are worrying about the exam now, congratulations, you can have our 4A0-D03 Study Tool. We can assure you that you can pass the exam as well as getting the related certification in a breeze with the guidance of our 4A0-D03 test torrent.
4A0-D03 New Test Bootcamp: https://www.itexamdownload.com/4A0-D03-valid-questions.html