2026 Latest ExamCost Plat-Arch-204 PDF Dumps and Plat-Arch-204 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Zk2d9cP84Gfa3AvGr9LbAYbX0jsH5re3
The one badge of Plat-Arch-204 certificate will increase your earnings and push you forward to achieve your career objectives. Are you ready to accept this challenge? Looking for the simple and easiest way to pass the Plat-Arch-204 certification exam? If your answer is yes then you do not need to get worried. Just visit the Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Pdf Dumps and explore the top features of Plat-Arch-204 test questions. If you feel that Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Plat-Arch-204 exam questions can be helpful in exam preparation then download Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Plat-Arch-204 updated questions and start preparation right now.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Scenario-based, Multiple-choice |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Technical Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English, Japanese |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 (initial), USD 200 (retake) |
| Recommended Training: | Architect Journey: Integration Architecture Salesforce Integration Architecture Course |
| Exam Registration: | Kryterion Webassessor Pearson VUE |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite at authorized test centers |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites; recommended: 3–4 years Salesforce platform experience, 1–2 years integration experience, knowledge of APIs, web services and enterprise patterns |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailheadacademy.salesforce.com/certificate/exam-integration-arch---Plat-Arch-204 |
>> Examcollection Plat-Arch-204 Questions Answers <<
Our Plat-Arch-204 study materials are compiled and tested by our expert. Plat-Arch-204 try hard to makes Plat-Arch-204 exam preparation easy with its several quality features. We send learning information in the form of questions and answers, and our Plat-Arch-204 study materials are highly relevant to what you need to pass Plat-Arch-204 certification exam. Our free demo will show you the actual Plat-Arch-204 Certification Exam. You can learn about real exams in advance by studying our Plat-Arch-204 study materials and improve your confidence in the exam so that you can pass Plat-Arch-204 exams with ease. This is also the reason that has been popular by the majority of candidates.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 39
Northern Trail Outfitters wants to use Salesforce as a front end for creating accounts using the lead-to-opportunity process. An order is created in Salesforce when the opportunity is Closed/Won, but the back-end Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is the data master for order. The customer wants to be able to see within Salesforce all the stages of order processing like Order Created, Order Shipped, and Order Paid that are within the retention window. Which message durability consideration should an integration architect make when designing a solution to meet these business requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When designing a solution that requires Salesforce to receive and display updates from a back-end ERP (such as order status changes), message durability is a critical factor for ensuring data consistency. In an event-driven architecture using Platform Events or Change Data Capture (CDC), Salesforce utilizes an event bus to handle these incoming notifications.
For high-volume event messages, the Salesforce platform provides a native 72-hour (3-day) retention window. This is a significant architectural advantage for several reasons:
System Resilience: If the Salesforce org or the integration middleware experiences a temporary disruption or is undergoing maintenance, the event messages published by the ERP remain stored in the bus for up to 3 days.
Data Recovery: Once the connection is restored, the subscribing system (Salesforce) can use the Replay ID to catch up on any missed events from the last 72 hours, ensuring that order stages like "Order Shipped" or "Order Paid" are not missed.
SLA Management: This 3-day window exceeds the 24-hour limit of older technologies like PushTopics or Outbound Messaging (Option A), providing more breathing room for disaster recovery scenarios.
While ReplayID -1 (Option C) is used to subscribe only to new events published after the subscription starts, it does not address the durability or retention of historical events needed for recovery. By highlighting the 72-hour retention window, the integration architect provides a design that is robust against outages and guarantees that the "System of Engagement" (Salesforce) stays synchronized with the "System of Record" (ERP).
NEW QUESTION # 40
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to use Shield Platform Encryption to encrypt social security numbers in order to meet a business requirement. Which action should an integration architect take prior to the implementation of Shield Platform Encryption?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Implementing Shield Platform Encryption is a significant architectural change that requires careful planning before activation. The architect's first priority must be to Review Shield Platform Encryption configurations and understand the platform's functional limitations.
Encryption at rest affects how data interacts with other platform features. For example, encrypting a field can impact the ability to use that field in SOQL WHERE clauses, report filters, list views, or as a unique/external ID. Before encrypting Social Security Numbers, the architect must audit all existing integrations, Apex code, and reports that reference that field to ensure they will still function correctly.
Option A is incorrect because unnecessarily encrypting all data can negatively impact system performance and break standard functionality. Encryption should be applied selectively to sensitive fields based on a clear data classification policy. Option B is factually wrong; Shield is a data protection tool, not an authentication or authorization mechanism like OAuth or SSO. By reviewing the configurations first, the architect can identify potential "blockers"-such as a field being used in a formula or a criteria-based sharing rule-and address them before the encryption keys are generated and applied.
NEW QUESTION # 41
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. The company has asked the integration architect to help fulfill such aspects with its Salesforce program. Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Salesforce is a highly capable CRM platform, but it is not a dedicated messaging or orchestration engine. When requirements include complex message queuing, process choreography, and guaranteed quality of service (QoS), the Integration Architect must recommend a middleware solution (ESB or iPaaS).
"True message queuing" involves holding messages in a persistent state until the target system is ready to receive them, handling sophisticated retry logic (such as exponential backoff), and providing dead-letter queues for failed messages. While Salesforce has basic asynchronous tools like Outbound Messaging or Platform Events, they lack the granular control over queuing and orchestration that enterprise middleware provides.
Option A is incorrect because performing heavy transformation and protocol translation (like XML to JSON or SOAP to REST) within Salesforce consumes excessive Apex CPU time and is better handled by middleware designed for that purpose. Option B is conceptually backward; usually, architects move away from synchronous Request-Reply toward asynchronous Fire-and-Forget to improve scalability. By recommending a middleware solution to handle these infrastructure-level concerns, the architect ensures that Salesforce remains performant for its users while the middleware manages the technical complexities of reliably connecting the enterprise.
NEW QUESTION # 42
Northern Trail Outfitters leverages Sales Cloud. When an opportunity has changed its status to "Closed/Won" and there are products attached, the details should be passed to the OMS for fulfillment operations. The callout from Salesforce to the OMS should be synchronous. What should an integration architect do to satisfy these requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
A synchronous requirement in Salesforce implies a Request-Reply pattern where the user waits for a response. To implement this correctly while adhering to platform constraints, the architect must initiate the callout from the User Interface (UI) layer.3 Option C is the correct architectural choice. By using a Lightning component and a button (or a Quick Act4ion), the callout is initiated directly from the user's session. The component calls an Apex controller, which performs the synchronous REST callout to the OMS. This allows the user to receive immediate feedback-such as a "Success" message or an "Error" notification from the OMS-directly on the Opportunity page.
Option A is incorrect because Apex Triggers are prohibited from making synchronous callouts. If a trigger initiates a callout, it must be asynchronous (using @future or Queueable Apex), which violates the business requirement for synchronicity. Making a synchronous call from a trigger would block the database transaction and could lead to "Uncommitted Work Pending" errors or system timeouts. Option B (Batch Apex) is inherently asynchronous and delayed; an hourly job would not provide the real-time, synchronous feedback required during the "Closed/Won" transition. Therefore, moving the integration logic to a UI-driven button is the only way to satisfy the synchronous requirement while staying within Salesforce's execution and transaction limits.
NEW QUESTION # 43
Universal Containers (UC) works with third-party agents on banner initial design concepts. The design files (2.5 GB) are stored in an on-premise file store. UC wants to allow agencies to view these files in the community. Which solution should an integration architect recommend?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When dealing with extremely large files, such as the 2.5 GB design files mentioned, an architect must consider the platform's file size limits and storage costs. Salesforce Files have a maximum upload size of 2 GB through most interfaces, making Option B technically unfeasible for a 2.5 GB file. Furthermore, storing numerous large files natively in Salesforce would lead to excessive storage consumption and costs.
The most efficient and cost-effective approach is Data Virtualization or Redirection. By creating a custom object to store the file location URL (Option C), the actual file remains in the performant on-premise file store. When the community user needs to access the design, they are redirected to the source system, which handles the massive data transfer. This fulfills the requirement to "view" the files without the overhead of moving gigabytes of data through the Salesforce infrastructure. Option A is less ideal because a 2.5 GB download over a standard Request-Reply pattern would likely lead to timeouts and a poor user experience.
NEW QUESTION # 44
......
Reliable Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus: https://www.examcost.com/Plat-Arch-204-practice-exam.html
DOWNLOAD the newest ExamCost Plat-Arch-204 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Zk2d9cP84Gfa3AvGr9LbAYbX0jsH5re3