BONUS!!! Download part of TestValid Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oQy9KB2AA2EyrI1EWuq-Qz6fRRa1eCDW
We declare that we can ensure you 100% pass, because we have the real exam questions for the Data-Engineer-Associate actual test. All the questions of Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate test pdf are taken from current pool of actual test, then after refined and checked, compiled into the complete dumps. Furthermore, the answers are correct and verified by our IT experts with decades of hands-on experience. So the high quality and accuracy of Data-Engineer-Associate Cert Guide are without any doubt. With our 100 % pass rate history & money back guarantee, you can rest assured to choose our Data-Engineer-Associate vce files.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Ensure data encryption
|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Automate data pipelines
|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Transform and process data
|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Understand data cataloging
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Valid Real Test <<
You only need 20-30 hours to practice our software materials and then you can attend the exam. It costs you little time and energy. The Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions are easy to be mastered and simplified the content of important information. The Data-Engineer-Associate test guide conveys more important information with amount of answers and questions, thus the learning for the examinee is easy and highly efficient. So it is convenient for the learners to master the Data-Engineer-Associate Guide Torrent and pass the Data-Engineer-Associate exam in a short time.
NEW QUESTION # 247
A company has a frontend ReactJS website that uses Amazon API Gateway to invoke REST APIs. The APIs perform the functionality of the website. A data engineer needs to write a Python script that can be occasionally invoked through API Gateway. The code must return results to API Gateway.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: B
Explanation:
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use Lambda to create functions that perform custom logic and integrate with other AWS services, such as API Gateway. Lambda automatically scales your application by running code in response to each trigger. You pay only for the compute time you consume1.
Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows you to run and scale containerized applications on AWS. You can use ECS to deploy, manage, and scale Docker containers using either Amazon EC2 instances or AWS Fargate, a serverless compute engine for containers2.
Amazon EKS is a fully managed Kubernetes service that allows you to run Kubernetes clusters on AWS without needing to install, operate, or maintain your own Kubernetes control plane. You can use EKS to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications using Kubernetes on AWS3.
The solution that meets the requirements with the least operational overhead is to create an AWS Lambda Python function with provisioned concurrency. This solution has the following advantages:
It does not require you to provision, manage, or scale any servers or clusters, as Lambda handles all the infrastructure for you. This reduces the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It allows you to write your Python script as a Lambda function and integrate it with API Gateway using a simple configuration. API Gateway can invoke your Lambda function synchronously or asynchronously, and return the results to the frontend website.
It ensures that your Lambda function is ready to respond to API requests without any cold start delays, by using provisioned concurrency. Provisioned concurrency is a feature that keeps your function initialized and hyper-ready to respond in double-digit milliseconds. You can specify the number of concurrent executions that you want to provision for your function.
Option A is incorrect because it requires you to deploy a custom Python script on an Amazon ECS cluster. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to provision, manage, and scale your own ECS cluster, either using EC2 instances or Fargate. This increases the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It requires you to package your Python script as a Docker container image and store it in a container registry, such as Amazon ECR or Docker Hub. This adds an extra step to your deployment process.
It requires you to configure your ECS cluster to integrate with API Gateway, either using an Application Load Balancer or a Network Load Balancer. This adds another layer of complexity to your architecture.
Option C is incorrect because it requires you to deploy a custom Python script that can integrate with API Gateway on Amazon EKS. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to provision, manage, and scale your own EKS cluster, either using EC2 instances or Fargate. This increases the operational complexity and cost of running your code.
It requires you to package your Python script as a Docker container image and store it in a container registry, such as Amazon ECR or Docker Hub. This adds an extra step to your deployment process.
It requires you to configure your EKS cluster to integrate with API Gateway, either using an Application Load Balancer, a Network Load Balancer, or a service of type LoadBalancer. This adds another layer of complexity to your architecture.
Option D is incorrect because it requires you to create an AWS Lambda function and ensure that the function is warm by scheduling an Amazon EventBridge rule to invoke the Lambda function every 5 minutes by using mock events. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It does not guarantee that your Lambda function will always be warm, as Lambda may scale down your function if it does not receive any requests for a long period of time. This may cause cold start delays when your function is invoked by API Gateway.
It incurs unnecessary costs, as you pay for the compute time of your Lambda function every time it is invoked by the EventBridge rule, even if it does not perform any useful work1.
Reference:
1: AWS Lambda - Features
2: Amazon Elastic Container Service - Features
3: Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service - Features
[4]: Building API Gateway REST API with Lambda integration - Amazon API Gateway
[5]: Improving latency with Provisioned Concurrency - AWS Lambda
[6]: Integrating Amazon ECS with Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Elastic Container Service
[7]: Integrating Amazon EKS with Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
[8]: Managing concurrency for a Lambda function - AWS Lambda
NEW QUESTION # 248
A company uses AWS Glue Data Catalog to index data that is uploaded to an Amazon S3 bucket every day. The company uses a daily batch processes in an extract, transform, and load (ETL) pipeline to upload data from external sources into the S3 bucket.
The company runs a daily report on the S3 dat
a. Some days, the company runs the report before all the daily data has been uploaded to the S3 bucket. A data engineer must be able to send a message that identifies any incomplete data to an existing Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: A
Explanation:
AWS Glue workflows are designed to orchestrate the ETL pipeline, and you can create data quality checks to ensure the uploaded datasets are complete before running reports. If there is an issue with the data, AWS Glue workflows can trigger an Amazon EventBridge event that sends a message to an SNS topic.
AWS Glue Workflows:
AWS Glue workflows allow users to automate and monitor complex ETL processes. You can include data quality actions to check for null values, data types, and other consistency checks.
In the event of incomplete data, an EventBridge event can be generated to notify via SNS.
Reference:
Alternatives Considered:
A (Airflow cluster): Managed Airflow introduces more operational overhead and complexity compared to Glue workflows.
B (EMR cluster): Setting up an EMR cluster is also more complex compared to the Glue-centric solution.
D (Lambda functions): While Lambda functions can work, using Glue workflows offers a more integrated and lower operational overhead solution.
AWS Glue Workflow Documentation
NEW QUESTION # 249
A company uploads .csv files to an Amazon S3 bucket. The company's data platform team has set up an AWS Glue crawler to perform data discovery and to create the tables and schemas.
An AWS Glue job writes processed data from the tables to an Amazon Redshift database. The AWS Glue job handles column mapping and creates the Amazon Redshift tables in the Redshift database appropriately.
If the company reruns the AWS Glue job for any reason, duplicate records are introduced into the Amazon Redshift tables. The company needs a solution that will update the Redshift tables without duplicates.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
To avoid duplicate records in Amazon Redshift, the most effective solution is to perform the ETL in a way that first loads the data into astaging tableand then uses SQL commands like MERGE or UPDATE to insert new records and update existing records without introducing duplicates.
* Using Staging Tables in Redshift:
* The AWS Glue job can write data to astaging tablein Redshift. Once the data is loaded, SQL commands can be executed to compare the staging data with the target table andupdate or insert records appropriately. This ensures no duplicates are introduced during re-runs of the Glue job.
Reference:Amazon Redshift Best Practices
Alternatives Considered:
B (MySQL upsert): This introduces unnecessary complexity by involving another database (MySQL).
C (Spark dropDuplicates): While Spark can eliminate duplicates, handling duplicates at the Redshift level with a staging table is a more reliable and Redshift-native solution.
D (AWS Glue ResolveChoice): The ResolveChoice transform in Glue helps with column conflicts but does not handle record-level duplicates effectively.
References:
Amazon Redshift MERGE Statements
Staging Tables in Amazon Redshift
NEW QUESTION # 250
A company currently stores all of its data in Amazon S3 by using the S3 Standard storage class.
A data engineer examined data access patterns to identify trends. During the first 6 months, most data files are accessed several times each day. Between 6 months and 2 years, most data files are accessed once or twice each month. After 2 years, data files are accessed only once or twice each year.
The data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy to develop new data storage rules. The new storage solution must continue to provide high availability.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitablefor data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.
Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a
12-hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.
Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.
Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after
6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.
Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone-IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.
References:
1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service
2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service
[7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What's New with AWS
NEW QUESTION # 251
A data engineer is building a new data pipeline that stores metadata in an Amazon DynamoDB table. The data engineer must ensure that all items that are older than a specified age are removed from the DynamoDB table daily.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST configuration effort?
Answer: D
Explanation:
DynamoDB Time to Live (TTL) automatically expires and deletes items based on a timestamp attribute - it requires minimal setup and runs without additional infrastructure.
The engineer only needs to define a TTL attribute (e.g., expiration_time) and set its epoch value when items are inserted.
"To automatically delete old items from a DynamoDB table, enable TTL and define a timestamp attribute.
Items are removed automatically after the specified time with no extra maintenance."
- Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf This is serverless, free, and requires no scheduling or code-based cleanup.
NEW QUESTION # 252
......
Sometime, most candidates have to attend an exam, they may feel nervious and don't know what to do. If you happen to be one of them, our Data-Engineer-Associate learning materials will greatly reduce your burden and improve your possibility of passing the exam. Our advantages of time-saving and efficient can make you no longer be afraid of the Data-Engineer-Associate Exam, and you will find more about the benefits of our Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions later on.
Exam Data-Engineer-Associate Tutorials: https://www.testvalid.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-exam-collection.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of TestValid Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oQy9KB2AA2EyrI1EWuq-Qz6fRRa1eCDW